Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire

CALICO Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 345-368

  Mills, Nicole ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; Engagement; Identity; Situated learning theory; Social networking

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055460717     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.28.2.345-368     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Inno-vate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index. php?view=article&id=382
2. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147-166.
3. Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociologi-cal Research Online, 12(5). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html
4. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5. Carlson, S. (2005). The net generation goes to college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(7), A34. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Net-Generation-Goes-to/12307
6. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cortazzi, M., Jin, L., Wall, D., & Cavendish, S. (2001). Sharing learning through narrative communica-tion. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(S1), 252-257.
8. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32-52). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Doyle, W., & Carter, K. (2003). Narrative and learning to teach: Implications for the teacher-education curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 129-137.
10. Eberhardt, D. M. (2007). Facing up to Facebook. About Campus, 12(4), 18-26.
11. Garrett, P. B. (2008). Researching language socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 10, 189-201.
12. Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul: Pleasure and learning. Melbourne: Common Ground.
13. Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (1998). The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Glenn, J. M. (2000). Teaching the net generation. Business Education Forum, 54(3), 6-14.
15. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246-259.
16. Gutierrez, K. D., Morales, P. Z., & Martinez, D. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from non-dominant communities. Review of Research in Education 2009, 33, 212-245.
17. Ito, M. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.itofisher.com/mito/weblog/2008/11/living_and_ learning_with_new_m.html
18. Jones, J. G., & Bronack, S. C. (2008). Rethinking cognition, representations, and processes in 3D online social learning environments. In P. C. Rivoltella (Ed.), Digital literacy: Tools and methodologies for information society (pp. 176-205). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
19. Lam, W. S. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local consid-erations. Language, Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-66. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/default.html
20. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching new literacies: Web 2.0 practices and insider perspec-tives. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4, 224-240.
21. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language develop-ment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
24. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11-16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 87-104.
25. Magnin, M. C. (1997). The building: An adaptation of Francis Debyser’s writing project. A global simulation to teach language and culture. In G. Walz (Ed.), China-U.S. Conference on Education (pp. 55-62). Greensboro, NC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Student Services. (ERIC Docu-ment Reproduction Service No. ED425398)
26. Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning and e-learning: The role of theory. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy in the digital age (pp. 13-25). London: Routledge.
27. Mills, N. A., & Péron, M. (2008). Global simulation and writing self-beliefs of intermediate French stu-dents. International Journal of Applied Linguistics: Special Issue on Learning and Teaching L2 Writing, 156, 239-273.
28. Murphy, E., & Loveless, J. (2005). Students’ self-analysis of contributions to online asynchronous discus-sions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 155-172.
29. National Council of Teachers of English. (2007). Multimodal literacies and technology. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/governance/MultimodalLiteracies
30. Pavlenko, A. (2001). Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender. New York: Walter De Gruyter.
31. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experi-ences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227-238.
32. Rosen, L. D. (2007). Me, Myspace, and I: Parenting the net generation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Rosen, L. D. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisi-tion: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Slater, D. (2002). Social relationships and identity online and offline. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 533-546). Lon-don: Sage Publications.
36. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
37. Thorne, S. L. (2008). Mediating technologies and second language learning. In Leu, D., Coiro, J., Lank-shear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 417-449). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22, 371-397. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/mem berBrowse.php?action=article&id=137
39. Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in internet interest communities and online games. Modern Language Journal, 93, 802-821.
40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Wiley, C., & Sisson, M. (2006, November). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of Facebook by students and employers. Paper presented at the Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton, OH.
43. Ziegler, S. G. (2007). The (mis)education of GenerationM. Learning, Media, and Technology, 32(1), 69-81.