Sustainable design from functional domain to physical domain

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 197, Issue , 2018, Pages 1296-1306

  He, Bin ^a   Niu, Yongchao ^a   Hou, Shuangchao ^a   Li, Fangfang ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Design parameters; Functional domain; Physical domain; Sustainable functional requirements

Indexed keywords

ECODESIGN; EXOSKELETON (ROBOTICS); LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MAPPING; POLLUTION CONTROL; PRODUCT DESIGN;

COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; DESIGN PARAMETERS; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; INFORMATION DESCRIPTIONS; PHYSICAL DOMAIN; SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DESIGNS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85053049235     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.249     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akao, Y., Development History of Quality Function Deployment: the Customer Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Deployment. 1994, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, Japan.
2. Albers, A., Wintergerst, E., Pinner, T., Breitschuh, J., Case study on requirements management in multidisciplinary product development. Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes, 2015, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 23–33.
3. Bilga, P.S., Singh, S., Kumar, R., Optimization of energy consumption response parameters for turning operation using Taguchi method. J. Clean. Prod. 137 (2016), 1406–1417.
4. Biju, P.L., Shalij, P.R., Prabhushankar, G.V., Evaluation of customer requirements and sustainability requirements through the application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 808–817.
5. Bovea, M., Pérez-Belis, V., A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. Clean. Prod. 20:1 (2012), 61–71.
6. Brace, W., Ekman, K., CORAMOD: a checklist-oriented model-based requirements analysis approach. Req. Eng. 19:1 (2014), 1–26.
7. Chen, C.H., Li, P.K., Wei, Y., PDCS—a product definition and customization system for product concept development. Expert Syst. Appl. 28:3 (2005), 591–602.
8. Cormen, T.H., Introduction to Algorithms. 2001, MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, London.
9. Di Noia, T., Mongiello, M., Straccia, U., Fuzzy description logics for component selection in software design. International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, 2015, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 228–239.
10. Fu, Y., Research on the Theory, Method and Application of Multi-performance Couple Analysis and Simulation of Digital Mock-up of Complex Products. 2008, Dissertation of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou (In Chinese).
11. Hänninen, N., Karjaluoto, H., Environmental values and customer-perceived value in industrial supplier relationships. J. Clean. Prod. 156 (2017), 604–613.
12. He, B., Deng, Z., Huang, S., et al. Application of unascertained number for the integration of carbon footprint in conceptual design. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf 229:11 (2015), 2088–2092.
13. He, B., Hua, Y., Feature-based integrated product model for low-carbon conceptual design. J. Eng. Des. 28:6 (2017), 408–432.
14. He, B., Huang, S., Functional synthesis of mechanisms under cost consideration. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf 230:1 (2016), 91–99.
15. He, B., Huang, S., Wang, J., Product low-carbon design using dynamic programming algorithm. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. G.T 2:1 (2015), 37–42.
16. He, B., Luo, T., Huang, S., Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle. J. Clean. Prod., 2018 (in press).
17. He, B., Gu, Z., Sustainable design synthesis for product environmental footprints. Des. Stud. 45 (2016), 159–186.
18. He, B., Pan, Q.J., Deng, Z.Q., Product carbon footprint for product life cycle under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 187 (2018), 459–472.
19. He, B., Song, W., Wang, Y., A feature-based approach towards an integrated product model in intelligent design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 69:1 (2013), 15–30.
20. He, B., Song, W., Wang, Y., Computational conceptual design using space matrix. ASME ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 15(1), 2015, 011004.
21. He, B., Tang, W., Huang, S., et al. Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 83:5–8 (2016), 1419–1429.
22. He, B., Tang, W., Wang, J., et al. Low-carbon conceptual design based on product life cycle assessment. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 81:5–8 (2015), 863–874.
23. He, B., Tang, W., Wang, J., Product model integrated with carbon footprint for low-carbon design. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16:11 (2015), 2383–2388.
24. He, B., Wang, J., Deng, Z., Cost-constrained low-carbon product design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79 (2015), 1821–1828.
25. He, B., Wang, J., Huang, S., et al. Low-carbon product design for product life cycle. J. Eng. Des. 26:10–12 (2015), 321–339.
26. He, B., Xiao, J.L., Deng, Z.Q., Product design evaluation for product environmental footprint. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 3066–3080.
27. He, B., Zhang, P., Liu, L., Simultaneous functional synthesis of mechanisms with mechanical efficiency and cost. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75:5–8 (2014), 659–665.
28. He, B., Zhang, P., Wang, J., Automated synthesis of mechanisms with consideration of mechanical efficiency. J. Eng. Des. 25:4–6 (2014), 213–237.
29. Howe, A.E., Cohen, P.R., Dixon, J.R., et al. Dominic: a domain independent program for mechanical design. Artif. Intell. Eng. 1:1 (1986), 23–28.
30. Kwong, C.K., Bai, H., A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. J. Intell. Manuf. 13:5 (2002), 367–377.
31. Lee, A.R., Application of Modified Fuzzy AHP Method to Analyze Bolting Sequence of Structural Joints. Dissertation, 1995, Lehigh University, Bethlehem.
32. Mcadams, D.A., Stone, R.B., Wood, K.L., Functional interdependence and product similarity based on customer needs. Res. Eng. Des. 11:1 (1999), 1–19.
33. Mousavi, A., Adl, P., Rakowski, R.T., Gunasekaran, A., Mirnezami, N., Customer optimization route and evaluation (CORE) for product design. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 14:2 (2001), 236–243.
34. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., et al. Engineering Design: a Systematic Approach. 2007, Springer London Ltd, London.
35. Pesonen, H.L., Josko, E., Hämäläinen, S., Improving eco-efficiency of a swimming hall through customer involvement. J. Clean. Prod. 39 (2013), 294–302.
36. Pugh, S., Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. 1994, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
37. Ramírez, Y., Cisternas, L.A., Kraslawski, A., Application of House of Quality in assessment of seawater pretreatment technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 148 (2017), 223–232.
38. Sawyer, P., Sommerville, I., Viller, S., Capturing the benefits of requirements engineering. IEEE Software 16:2 (1999), 78–85.
39. Schöggl, J.P., Baumgartner, R.J., Hofer, D., Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: a checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2017), 1602–1617.
40. Snodgrass, T.J., Kasi, M., Function Analysis—stepping Stones to Value. 1983, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
41. Suh, N.P., Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Sun, J., Kalenchuk, D.K., Xue, D., Gu, P., Design candidate identification using neural network-based fuzzy reasoning. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 16:5 (2000), 383–396.
43. Tapia, J.F.D., Promentilla, M.A.B., Tseng, M.L., Tan, R.R., Screening of carbon dioxide utilization options using hybrid analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis method. J. Clean. Prod. 165 (2017), 1361–1370.
44. Tseng, S.C., Hung, S.W., A framework identifying the gaps between customers’ expectations and their perceptions in green products. J. Clean. Prod. 59 (2013), 174–184.
45. Vezzetti, E., Alemanni, M., Morelli, B., New product development (NPD) of ‘family business’ dealing in the luxury industry: evaluating maturity stage for implementing a PLM solution. Int. J. Technol. Des. Ed. 10:2 (2017), 219–229.
46. Violante, M.G., Vezzetti, E., Kano qualitative vs quantitative approaches: an assessment framework for products attributes analysis. Comput. Ind. 86 (2017), 15–25.
47. Wang, J., Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37:4 (1999), 899–916.
48. Xu, Q., Jiao, R.J., Yang, X., et al. An analytical KANO model for customer need analysis. Des. Stud. 30:1 (2009), 87–110.
49. Zaman, U.K.U., Siadat, A., Rivette, M., et al. Integrated product-process design to suggest appropriate manufacturing technology: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 91:1–4 (2017), 1409–1430.
50. Zhang, J., Xue, D., Gu, P., Robust adaptable design considering changes of requirements and parameters during product operation stage. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 72:1 (2014), 387–401.