Product design evaluation for product environmental footprint

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 172, Issue , 2016, Pages 3066-3080

  He, Bin ^a   Xiao, Jinglong ^a   Deng, Zhongqiang ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Conceptual design; Design evaluation; Ecodesign; Product environmental footprint; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; ECODESIGN; LIFE CYCLE; WIND POWER;

DESIGN EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINTS; MATHEMATICAL THEORY; OFF-SHORE WIND POWER; PRODUCT CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS; PRODUCT INFORMATION; UNASCERTAINED MEASURE; UNCERTAINTY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 85038860873     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.104     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ajukumar, V.N., Gandhi, O.P., Evaluation of green maintenance initiatives in design and development of mechanical systems using an integrated approach. J. Clean. Prod. 51 (2013), 34–46.
2. Amaya, J., Lelah, A., Zwolinski, P., Design for intensified use in product–service systems using life-cycle analysis. J. Eng. Des. 25:7–9 (2014), 280–302.
3. Baran, M., Yıldırım, M., Yılmaz, A., Evaluation of ecological design strategies in traditional houses in Diyarbakir, Turkey. J. Clean. Prod. 19:6 (2011), 609–619.
4. Betz, G., Vogl, H., The Environmental Friendly Product: a Practical Guide for the Environmentally Conscious Development. 1996, Luchterhand Verlag, Berlin.
5. Bovea, M., Pérez-Belis, V., A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. Clean. Prod. 20:1 (2012), 61–71.
6. Chami, M., Bruel, J.M., Towards an integrated conceptual design evaluation of mechatronic systems: the SysDICE approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 51 (2015), 650–659.
7. Cross, N., Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
8. Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Ramani, K., Integration of sustainability into early design through the function impact matrix. ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(8), 2010, 081004.
9. Doultsinou, A., Roy, R., Baxter, D., Gao, J., Mann, A., Developing a service knowledge reuse framework for engineering design. J. Eng. Des. 20:4 (2009), 389–411.
10. Eddy, D.C., Krishnamurty, S., Grosse, I.R., Wileden, J.C., Lewis, K.E., A normative decision analysis method for the sustainability-based design of products. J. Eng. Des. 24:5 (2013), 342–362.
11. Gagnon, B., Leduc, R., Savard, L., From a conventional to a sustainable engineering design process: different shades of sustainability. J. Eng. Des. 23:1 (2012), 49–74.
12. Guo, Y., Proctor, R.W., Salvendy, G., A Conceptual Model of the Axiomatic Usability Evaluation Method. in: Human Interface and the Management of Information, Interacting with Information. 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 93–102.
13. Gupta, S., Kota, S., Mishra, R.P., Modeling and evaluation of product quality at conceptual design stage. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 7:1 (2016), 163–177.
14. He, B., Feng, P.E., Guiding conceptual design through functional space exploration. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 66 (2013), 1999–2011.
15. He, B., Song, W., Wang, Y.G., A feature-based approach towards an integrated product model in intelligent design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 69 (2013), 15–30.
16. He, B., Zhang, P.C., Liu, L.L., Simultaneous functional synthesis of mechanisms with mechanical efficiency and cost. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75 (2014), 659–665.
17. He, B., Zhang, P.C., Wang, J., Automated synthesis of mechanisms with consideration of mechanical efficiency. J. Eng. Des. 25:4–6 (2014), 213–237.
18. He, B., Deng, Z.Q., Huang, S., Wang, J., Application of unascertained number for the integration of carbon footprint in conceptual design. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 229:11 (2015), 2088–2092.
19. He, B., Song, W., Wang, Y., Computational conceptual design using space matrix. ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 15(1), 2015, 011004.
20. He, B., Wang, J., Deng, Z.Q., Cost-constrained low-carbon product design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79 (2015), 1821–1828.
21. He, B., Wang, J., Huang, S., Wang, Y., Low-carbon product design for product life cycle. J. Eng. Des. 26:10–12 (2015), 321–339.
22. He, B., Huang, S., Wang, J., Product low-carbon design using dynamic programming algorithm. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man. Green Tech. 2:1 (2015), 37–42.
23. He, B., Gu, Z.C., Sustainable design synthesis for product environmental footprints. Des. Stud. 45 (2016), 159–186.
24. He, B., Hua, Y.C., Synthesis of mechanisms integrated with motion and force transformation. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 17:12 (2016), 1643–1649.
25. He, B., Hua, Y.C., Feature-based integrated product model for low-carbon conceptual design. J. Eng. Des. 28:6 (2017), 408–432.
26. Hirtz, J., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Szykman, S., Wood, K.L., A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res. Eng. Des. 13:2 (2002), 65–82.
27. Huang, H.Z., Li, Y., Liu, W., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Evaluation and decision of products conceptual design schemes based on customer requirements. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 25:9 (2011), 2413–2425.
28. Huang, H.Z., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Xue, L., Wang, Z., New evaluation methods for conceptual design selection using computational intelligence techniques. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 27:3 (2013), 733–746.
29. Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Moore, J.C., Qiao, Q., Li, Q., Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 103 (2015), 1–12.
30. Jeong, I.T., Lee, K.M., Assessment of the ecodesign improvement options using the global warming and economic performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 1206–1213.
31. Khoshnevisan, B., Bolandnazar, E., Shamshirband, S., Shariati, H.M., Anuar, N.B., Kiah, M.L.M., Decreasing environmental impacts of cropping systems using life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-objective genetic algorithm. J. Clean. Prod. 86 (2015), 67–77.
32. Kitamura, Y., Kashiwase, M., Fuse, M., Mizoguchi, R., Deployment of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge. Adv. Eng. Inf. 18:2 (2004), 115–127.
33. Komoto, H., Tomiyama, T., A framework for computer-aided conceptual design and its application to system architecting of mechatronics products. Comput. Aided Des. 44:10 (2012), 931–946.
34. Legardeur, J., Boujut, J.F., Tiger, H., Lessons learned from an empirical study of the early design phases of an unfulfilled innovation. Res. Eng. Des. 21:4 (2010), 249–262.
35. Lennon, E., Farr, J., Besser, R., Evaluation of multi-attribute decision making systems applied during the concept design of new microplasma devices. Expert Syst. Appl. 40:16 (2013), 6321–6329.
36. Liu, K.D., Lin, Y., Yao, L., Informational uncertainties and their mathematical expressions. Kybernetes 30:4 (2001), 378–397.
37. Liu, K.D., Wu, H.Q., Pong, Y.J., Liu, K.C., Guo, C.Q., Unascertained Information, Mathematical Treatments and Applications. 1999, Scientific Press, Beijing.
38. Luttropp, C., Lagerstedt, J., Ecodesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J. Clean. Prod. 14 (2006), 1396–1408.
39. Ma, J., Kremer, G.E.O., A fuzzy logic-based approach to determine product component end-of-life option from the views of sustainability and designer's perception. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 289–300.
40. Manfredi, S., Allacker, K., Chomkhamsri, K., Pelletier, N., Maia de Souza, D., Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide. 2012, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
41. McMahon, C., Lowe, A., Culley, S., Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification. J. Eng. Des. 15:4 (2004), 307–325.
42. Morrison, J.R., Azhar, M., Lee, T., Suh, H., Axiomatic design for eco-design: eAD+. J. Eng. Des. 24:10 (2013), 711–737.
43. Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., Voogd, H., Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. 2013, Elsevier.
44. Nikander, J.B., Liikkanen, L.A., Laakso, M., The preference effect in design concept evaluation. Des. Stud. 35:5 (2014), 473–499.
45. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Engineering Design: a Systematic Approach. 1996, Springer, London.
46. Saaty, T.L., What Is the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
47. Song, J.S., Lee, K.M., Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54 (2010), 547–556.
48. Štorga, M., Andreasen, M.M., Marjanović, D., The design ontology: foundation for the design knowledge exchange and management. J. Eng. Des. 21:4 (2010), 427–454.
49. Su, J.C.P., Chu, C., Wang, Y., A decision support system to estimate the carbon emission and cost of product designs. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13:7 (2012), 1037–1045.
50. Taghavifar, H., Mardani, A., Prognostication of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis of apple production in West Azarbayjan of Iran using Artificial Neural Network. J. Clean. Prod. 87 (2015), 159–167.
51. Ullah, R., Zhou, D.Q., Zhou, P., Hussain, M., Sohail, M.A., An approach for space launch vehicle conceptual design and multi-attribute evaluation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 25:1 (2013), 65–74.
52. Wang, J., A fuzzy outranking method for conceptual design evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 35:4 (1997), 995–1010.
53. Wei, W., Fan, W., Li, Z., Multi-objective optimization and evaluation method of modular product configuration design scheme. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75:9–12 (2014), 1527–1536.
54. Xiao, Y.L., Liu, X.J., Liu, J.B., The method of giving weight for performance indicator based on entropy method. J. Daqing Pet. Inst. 29:1 (2005), 107–109.
55. Xu, Z.Z., Wang, Y.S., Teng, Z.R., Zhong, C.Q., Teng, H.F., Low-carbon product multi-objective optimization design for meeting requirements of enterprise, user and government. J. Clean. Prod. 103 (2015), 747–758.
56. Younesi, M., Roghanian, E., A framework for sustainable product design: a hybrid fuzzy approach based on Quality Function Deployment for environment. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 385–394.