Error grid analysis for arterial pressure method comparison studies

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 1177-1185

  Saugel, Bernd ^a   Grothe, Oliver ^b   Nicklas, Julia Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; INTENSIVE CARE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME FACTOR;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CONSENSUS; CRITICAL CARE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85051810305     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002585     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Saugel B, Dueck R, Wagner JY. Measurement of blood pressure. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:309-322.
2. Wagner JY, Saugel B. When should we adopt continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies into clinical routine? J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:1-3.
3. Meidert AS, Huber W, Müller JN, et al. Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:521-528.
4. Wagner JY, Negulescu I, Schöfthaler M, et al. Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:807-813.
5. Broch O, Bein B, Gruenewald M, et al. A comparison of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure with invasive radial and femoral pressure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:248-256.
6. Saugel B, Reuter DA. Are we ready for the age of non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring? Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:340-343.
7. Hapfelmeier A, Cecconi M, Saugel B. Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:149-155.
8. Squara P, Imhoff M, Cecconi M. Metrology in medicine: from measurements to decision, with specific reference to anesthesia and intensive care. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:66-75.
9. Saugel B, Grothe O, Wagner JY. Tracking changes in cardiac output: statistical considerations on the 4-quadrant plot and the polar plot methodology. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:514-524.
10. Thiele RH, McMurry TL. Data agnosticism and implications on method comparison studies. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:264-266.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
12. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85-91.
13. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:622-628.
14. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-268.
15. Cox DJ, Clarke WL, Gonder-Frederick L, et al. Accuracy of perceiving blood glucose in IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:529-536.
16. Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Kovatchev BP, Julian DM, Clarke WL. Understanding error grid analysis. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:911-912.
17. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1143-1148.
18. Klonoff DC, Lias C, Vigersky R, et al; Error Grid Panel. The surveillance error grid. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:658-672.
19. http://my.aami.org/aamiresources/preview-files/8106002-1306-preview.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2017. ASiMTAAAINispcioamt.
20. Lee J, Scott DJ, Villarroel M, Clifford GD, Saeed M, Mark RG. Open-access MIMIC-II database for intensive care research. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:8315-8318.
21. Saeed M, Villarroel M, Reisner AT, et al. Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II: a public-access intensive care unit database. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:952-960.
22. Goldberger AL, Amaral LA, Glass L, et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000;101:E215-E220.
23. Lehman LW, Saeed M, Talmor D, Mark R, Malhotra A. Methods of blood pressure measurement in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:34-40.
24. Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Rice MJ. Let's think clinically instead of mathematically about device accuracy. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:89-91.