Data agnosticism and implications on method comparison studies

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 264-266

  Thiele, Robert H ^a   Mcmurry, Timothy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PLOTS AND CURVES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC;

EID: 84937874336     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000810     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Altman DG, Statistics and ethics in medical research: V-analysing data. Br Med J 1980 281 1473 5
2. Altman DG, Bland JM, Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983 32 307 17
3. Bland JM, Altman DG, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 1 307 10
4. Perrino AC Jr, O'Connor T, Luther M, Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1994 78 1060 6
5. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM, A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010 111 1180 92
6. Saugel B, Grothe O, Wagner JY, Tracking changes in cardiac output: statistical considerations on the 4-quadrant plot and the polar plot methodology. Anesth Analg 2015 121 514 24
7. Maus TM, Reber B, Banks DA, Berry A, Guerrero E, Manecke GR, Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011 25 770 5
8. van Der Kleij SC, Koolen BB, Newhall DA, Gerritse BM, Rosseel PM, Rijpstra TA, Geisler FE, van Der Meer NJ, Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method. Anaesthesia 2012 67 729 33
9. Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Mikawa M, Uchihara Y, Matsuyama T, Matsuura T, Funao T, Yamada T, Mori T, Nishikawa K, Improved performance of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system for tracking cardiac output changes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015 29 656 62
10. Critchley LA, Critchley JA, A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999 15 85 91
11. Møller-Sørensen H, Hansen KL, Østergaard M, Andersen LW, Møller K, Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012 56 433 40
12. Cooper ES, Muir WW, Continuous cardiac output monitoring via arterial pressure waveform analysis following severe hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Crit Care Med 2007 35 1724 9
13. Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR, Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010 14 R212
14. Cecconi M, Dawson D, Casaretti R, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution. Minerva Anestesiol 2010 76 1010 7
15. Sokolski M, Rydlewska A, Krakowiak B, Biegus J, Zymlinski R, Banasiak W, Jankowska EA, Ponikowski P, Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of haemodynamic parameters in patients with advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2011 12 773 8
16. Preiss D, Fisher J, A measure of confidence in Bland-Altman analysis for the interchangeability of two methods of measurement. J Clin Monit Comput 2008 22 257 9
17. Bland JM, Altman DG, Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999 8 135 60
18. Myles PS, Cui J, Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007 99 309 11
19. Dexter F, Epstein RH, Bayman EO, Ledolter J, Estimating surgical case durations and making comparisons among facilities: identifying facilities with lower anesthesia professional fees. Anesth Analg 2013 116 1103 15