Yeast Pro- and Paraprobiotics Have the Capability to Bind Pathogenic Bacteria Associated with Animal Disease

Translational Animal Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 60-68

  Posadas, Gabriel A ^a   Broadway, Paul R ^b   Thornton, Justin A ^a   Carroll, Jeffery A ^b   Lawrence, Amanda ^c   Corley, Jimmie R ^d   Thompson, Amber ^a   Donaldson, Janet R ^a,e  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Lesaffre International   (United States)

^e University of Southern Mississippi   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Direct antagonism; Paraprobiotics; Pathogenic bacteria; Yeast probiotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050944017     PISSN: None     EISSN: 25732102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/tas2016.0007     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Braude, R., S. K. Kon, and E. G. White. 1944. Yeast as a protein supplement for pigs: Further observations on its rachitogenic effect. J. Comp. Pathol. Ther. 54:88-96. doi:10.1016/S0368-1742(44)80009-1
2. Chaucheyras-Durand, F., and G. Fonty. 2002. Influence of a probiotic yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077) on microbial colonization and fermentations in the rumen of newborn lambs. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 14:30-36. doi:10.1080/089106002760002739
3. Chaucheyras-Durand, F., S. Masseglia, and G. Fonty. 2005. Effect of the microbial feed additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 on protein and peptide degrading activities of rumen bacteria grown in vitro. Curr. Microbiol. 50:96-101. doi:10.1007/ s00284-004-4433-1
4. Dawson, K. A. 2001. The application of yeast and yeast derivatives in the poultry industry. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Sym. 13:100-105
5. Donaldson, J. R., S. Shields-Menard, J. M. Bernard, E. Revellame, J. I. Hall, A. Lawrence, J. G. Wilson, A. Lipzen, J. Martin, W. Schackwitz, T. Woyke, N. Shapiro, K. S. Biddle, W. E. Holmes, R. Hernandez, and W. T. French. 2014. Characterization of the novel Enterobacter cloacae strain JD6301 and a genetically modified variant capable of producing extracellular lipids. Agricul. Food Anal. Bacteriol. 4:212-223
6. Duarte, K. M. R., L. H. Gomes, A. C. K. Sampaio, J. Issakowicz, F. Rocha, T. P. Granato, and S. R. Terra. 2012. Saccharomyces Cerevisiae used as probiotic: Strains characterization And cell viability. J. Agricul. Vet. Sci. 1:17-19. doi:10.9790/2380-0121719
7. Dunlop, R. H., S. A. McEwen, A. H. Meek, R. C. Clarke, W. D. Black, and R. M. Friendship. 1998. Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada. Prev. Vet. Med. 34:283-305. doi:10.1016/ S0167-5877(97)00095-0
8. FAO/WHO. 2002. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food; Ontario, Canada. (Accessed 15 August 2016.) ISBN: 92-5-105513-0
9. Gedek, B. R. 1999. Adherence of Escherichia coli serogroup O 157 and the Salmonella Typhimurium mutant DT 104 to the surface of Saccharomyces boulardii. Mycoses 42:261-264. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00449.x
10. Kollar, R., B. B. Reinhold, E. Petráková, H. J. Yeh, G. Ashwell, J. Drgonová, J. C. Kapteyn, F. M. Klis, and E. Cabib. 1997. Architecture of the yeast cell wall. Beta(1®6)-glucan interconnects mannoprotein, beta(1®)3-glucan, and chitin. J. Biol. Chem. 272:17762-17775. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.28.17762
11. Korhonen, T. K., H. Leffler, and C. Svanborg Eden. 1981. Binding specificity of piliated strains of Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium to epithelial cells, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, and erythrocytes. Infect. Immun. 32:796-804. doi: 0019-9567/81/050796-09$02.00/0
12. Martins, F. S., G. Dalmasso, R. M. E. Arantes, A. Doye, E. Lemichez, P. Lagadec, V. Imbert, J. F. Peyron, P. Rampal, J. R. Nicoli, D. Czerucka. 2010. Interaction of Saccharomyces boulardii with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium protects mice and modifies T84 cell response to the infection. PLoS One 5:e8925. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008925
13. Martins, F. S., R. M. Nardi, R. M. Arantes, C. A. Rosa, M. J. Neves, and J. R. Nicoli. 2005. Screening of yeasts as probiotic based on capacities to colonize the gastrointestinal tract and to protect against enteropathogen challenge in mice. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 51:83-92. doi:10.2323/jgam.51.83
14. Merritt, M. E., and J. R. Donaldson. 2009. Effect of bile salts on DNA and membrane integrity of enteric bacteria. J. Med. Microbiol. 58:1533-1541. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.014092-0
15. Middelbos, I. S., M. R. Godoy, N. D. Fastinger, and G. C. Fahey, Jr. 2007. A dose-response evaluation of spray-dried yeast cell wall supplementation of diets fed to adult dogs: Effects on nutrient digestibility, immune indices, and fecal microbial populations. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3022-3032. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0079
16. Ofek, I., D. Mirelman, and N. Sharon. 1977. Adherence of Escherichia coli to human mucosal cells mediated by mannose receptors. Nature 265:623-625. doi:10.1038/265623a0
17. Reid, G., J. Jass, M. T. Sebulsky, and J. K. McCormick. 2003. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16:658-672. doi:10.1128/CMR.16.4.658-672.2003
18. Sanchez, N. C., T. R. Young, J. A. Carroll, J. R. Corley, R. J. Rathmann, B. J. Johnson. 2014. Yeast cell wall supplementation alters the metabolic responses of crossbred heifers to an endotoxin challenge. Innate Immun. 20:104-112. doi:10.1177/1753425913482152
19. Schneebeli, R., and T. Egli. 2013. A defined, glucose-limited mineral medium for the cultivation of Listeria spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:2503-2511. doi:10.1128/AEM.03538-12
20. Sharon, N. 1987. Bacterial lectins, cell-cell recognition and infectious disease. FEBS Letters. 217: 145-157. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80654-3
21. Shoaf-Sweeney, K. D., and R. W. Hutkins. 2009. Adherence, anti-adherence, and oligosaccharides preventing pathogens from sticking to the host. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 55:101-61. doi: 10.1016/ S1043-4526(08)00402-6
22. Taverniti, V., and S. Guglielmetti. 2011. The immunomodulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: Proposal of paraprobiotic concept). Genes Nutr. 6:261-274. doi:10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x
23. Thrune, M., A. Bach, M. Ruiz-Moreno, and M. D. Stern. 2009. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal pH and microbial fermentation in dairy cows: Yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation. Livest. Sci. 124:261-265. doi:10.1016/j. livsci.2009.02.007
24. Tiago, F. C., F. S. Martins, E. L. Souza, P. F. Pimenta, H. R. Araujo, I. M. Castro, R. L. Brandäo, and J. R. Nicoli. 2012. Adhesion to the yeast cell surface as a mechanism for trapping pathogenic bacteria by Saccharomyces probiotics. J. Med. Microbiol. 61:1194-1207. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.042283-0
25. Tripathi, M. K., and S. A. Karim. 2011. Effect of yeast cultures on supplementation on live weight change, rumen fermentation, ciliate protozoa population, microbial hydrolytic enzymes status and slaughtering performance of growing lamb. Liv. Sci. 135:17-25. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.007
26. van der Peet-Schwering, C. M., A. J. Jansman, H. Smidt, and I. Yoon. 2007. Effects of yeast culture on performance, gut integrity, and blood cell composition of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3099-3109. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0110