Systematic evaluation of error rates and causes in short samples in next-generation sequencing

Scientific Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Pfeiffer, Franziska ^a   Gröber, Carsten ^b   Blank, Michael ^b   Händler, Kristian ^a,c   Beyer, Marc ^a,c   Schultze, Joachim L ^a,c   Mayer, Günter ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b Am Klopferspitz 19a   (Germany)

^c GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

^d Center of Aptamer Research and Development   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; GENE MUTATION; IN VITRO SELECTION; MUTATION RATE; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SOFTWARE; BIOLOGY; DNA SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MUTATION; PROCEDURES; QUALITY CONTROL;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MUTATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85050538964     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29325-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kulski, J. K. In Next Generation Sequencing - Advances, Applications and Challenges (ed Jerzy K. Kulski) Ch. 01 (InTech, 2016).
2. Fox, E. J., Reid-Bayliss, K. S., Emond, M. J. & Loeb, L. A. Accuracy of Next Generation Sequencing Platforms. Next generation, sequencing & applications 1, https://doi.org/10.4172/jngsa.1000106 (2014).
3. Fuller, C. W. et al. The challenges of sequencing by synthesis. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1013–1023, 10.1038/nbt.1585 (2009).
4. Massingham, T. & Goldman, N. All Your Base: a fast and accurate probabilistic approach to base calling. Genome Biol. 13, R13, 10.1186/gb-2012-13-2-r13 (2012).
5. Wang, B., Wan, L., Wang, A. & Li, L. M. An adaptive decorrelation method removes Illumina DNA base-calling errors caused by crosstalk between adjacent clusters. Scientific reports 7, 41348, 10.1038/srep41348 (2017).
6. Schirmer, M. et al. Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e37–e37, 10.1093/nar/gku1341 (2015).
7. Kao, W. C., Stevens, K. & Song, Y. S. BayesCall: A model-based base-calling algorithm for high-throughput short-read sequencing. Genome Res. 19, 1884–1895, 10.1101/gr.095299.109 (2009).
8. Kircher, M., Stenzel, U. & Kelso, J. Improved base calling for the Illumina Genome Analyzer using machine learning strategies. Genome Biol. 10, R83, 10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r83 (2009).
9. Gundry, M. & Vijg, J. Direct mutation analysis by high-throughput sequencing: from germline to low-abundant, somatic variants. Mutat. Res. 729, 1–15, 10.1016/mrfmmm.2011.10.001 (2012).
10. Chen, S. et al. AfterQC: automatic filtering, trimming, error removing and quality control for fastq data. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 80, 10.1186/s12859-017-1469-3 (2017).
11. Zhang, T. H., Wu, N. C. & Sun, R. A benchmark study on error-correction by read-pairing and tag-clustering in amplicon-based deep sequencing. BMC Genomics 17, 108, 10.1186/s12864-016-2388-9 (2016).
12. Hoinka, J. & Przytycka, T. AptaPLEX - A dedicated, multithreaded demultiplexer for HT-SELEX data. Methods 106, 82–85, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.04.011 (2016).
13. Zhao, L. et al. MapReduce for accurate error correction of next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx089 (2017).
14. Beltman, J. B. et al. Reproducibility of Illumina platform deep sequencing errors allows accurate determination of DNA barcodes in cells. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 151, 10.1186/s12859-016-0999-4 (2016).
15. Zhou, S., Jones, C., Mieczkowski, P. & Swanstrom, R. Primer ID validates template sampling depth and greatly reduces the error rate of Next-Generation Sequencing of HIV-1 genomic RNA populations. J. Virol. 89, 8540–8555, 10.1128/jvi.00522-15 (2015).
16. Kircher, M., Sawyer, S. & Meyer, M. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e3, 10.1093/nar/gkr771 (2012).
17. Liao, P., Satten, G. A. & Hu, Y. J. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 41, 375–387, 10.1002/gepi.22048 (2017).
18. Zimmermann, B., Gesell, T., Chen, D., Lorenz, C. & Schroeder, R. Monitoring genomic sequences during SELEX using high-throughput sequencing: Neutral SELEX. PLoS ONE 5, e9169, 10.1371/journal.pone.0009169 (2010).
19. Beier, R. et al. Selection of a DNA aptamer against norovirus capsid protein VP1. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 351, 162–169, 10.1111/1574-6968.12366 (2014).
20. Thiel, W. H. et al. Nucleotide bias observed with a short SELEX RNA aptamer library. Nucleic Acid Ther 21, 253–263, 10.1089/nat.2011.0288 (2011).
21. Thiel, W. H. & Giangrande, P. H. Analyzing HT-SELEX data with the Galaxy Project tools–A web based bioinformatics platform for biomedical research. Methods 97, 3–10, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.008 (2016).
22. Blank, M. Next-generation analysis of deep sequencing data: Bringing light into the black box of SELEX experiments. Methods Mol. Biol. 1380, 85–95, 10.1007/978-1-4939-3197-2_7 (2016).
23. Caroli, J., Taccioli, C., De La Fuente, A., Serafini, P. & Bicciato, S. APTANI: a computational tool to select aptamers through sequence-structure motif analysis of HT-SELEX data. Bioinformatics 32, 161–164, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv545 (2016).
24. Tolle, F. & Mayer, G. Preparation of SELEX samples for Next-Generation Sequencing. Methods Mol. Biol. 1380, 77–84, 10.1007/978-1-4939-3197-2_6 (2016).
25. Tolle, F., Brändle, G. M., Matzner, D. & Mayer, G. A versatile approach towards nucleobase-modified aptamers. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 54, 10971–10974, 10.1002/anie.201503652 (2015).
26. Tolle, F., Rosenthal, M., Pfeiffer, F. & Mayer, G. Click reaction on solid phase enables high fidelity synthesis of nucleobase-modified DNA. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 500–503, 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00668 (2016).
27. Ingale, S. A., Mei, H., Leonard, P. & Seela, F. Ethynyl side chain hydration during synthesis and workup of “clickable” oligonucleotides: bypassing acetyl group formation by triisopropylsilyl protection. J. Org. Chem. 78, 11271–11282, 10.1021/jo401780u (2013).
28. Li, B. et al. QPLOT: a quality assessment tool for next generation sequencing data. BioMed research international 2013, 865181, 10.1155/2013/865181 (2013).
29. Dohm, J. C., Lottaz, C., Borodina, T. & Himmelbauer, H. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e105, 10.1093/nar/gkn425 (2008).
30. Kelley, D. R., Schatz, M. C. & Salzberg, S. L. Quake: quality-aware detection and correction of sequencing errors. Genome Biol. 11, R116, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-11-r116 (2010).
31. Oyola, S. O. et al. Optimizing Illumina next-generation sequencing library preparation for extremely AT-biased genomes. BMC Genomics 13, 1, 10.1186/1471-2164-13-1 (2012).
32. Blind, M. & Blank, M. Aptamer Selection Technology and Recent Advances. Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids 4, e223, 10.1038/mtna.2014.74 (2015).
33. Civit, L. et al. Systematic evaluation of cell-SELEX enriched aptamers binding to breast cancer cells. Biochimie, 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.10.007 (2017).
34. May, A. et al. NGS-eval: NGS Error analysis and novel sequence variant detection tooL. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W301–305, 10.1093/nar/gkv346 (2015).