Navigating platform urbanism

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 142, Issue , 2019, Pages 364-372

  van der Graaf, Shenja ^a   Ballon, Pieter ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

(social) navigation applications; Mediatisation; Participation; Platformisation; Smart city; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

SMART CITY; URBAN PLANNING;

COMPLEX PLATFORM; MEDIATISATION; PARTICIPATION; PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT; PLATFORMISATION; POINT OF DEPARTURES; PUBLIC ORGANISATION; PUBLIC VALUES;

REGIONAL PLANNING;

NAVIGATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PUBLIC SPACE; SMART CITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GEOGRAPHY; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION;

EID: 85050149184     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Almeida, V., Doneda, D., Moreira da Costa, E., Humane smart cities: the need for governance. IEEE Internet Comput. 22:2 (2018), 91–95.
2. Armstrong, M., Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econ. 37:3 (2006), 668–691, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x.
3. Arnott, R., De Palama, A., Lindsey, R., Does providing information to drivers reduce traffic congestion?. Transp. Res. 25 A (1991), 309–318.
4. Augustin, S., Designing for Humans. Conscious Cities J., 2, 2017 (ISSN 2514-0914).
5. Bakst, A., How to reach drivers on the GO. Presented at Madrid Mobile Summit 2017, 14 November 2017, 2017 http://www.mmsummit.com.
6. Ballon, P., Platform Types and Gatekeeper Roles: e Case of the Mobile Communications Industry. Presented at the Summer Conference on CBS- Copenhagen Business School, Denmark. 2009.
7. Ballon, P., Smart Cities: Hoe Technologie Onze Steden Leefbaar Houdt En Slimmer Maakt. 2016, LannooCampus, Leuven, België.
8. Berdou, E., Organization in Open Source Communities: At the Crossroads of the Gift and Market Economies. 2011, Routledge, New York.
9. Bond, M., The Hidden Ways that Architecture Affects How You Feel. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170605-the-psychology-behind-your-citys-design, 2017. (Accessed 8 September 2017)
10. Botta, F., Can we understand crowds and cities using online data?. Consciouss Cities, vol. 1, 2016 https://www.ccities.org/can-we-understand-crowds-and-cities-using-online-data/. (Accessed 5 August 2017)
11. Bovy, P.H.L., Stern, E., Route Choice: Wayfinding in Transport Networks. 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, Boston, and London.
12. Bowen, G., Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual. Res. J. 9:2 (2009), 27–40, 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
13. Bresnahan, T., Greenstein, S., Mobile computing: next platform rivalry. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:5 (2014), 475–480.
14. Bruns, A., Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. 2008, Peter Lang, New York.
15. Bryman, A., Social Research Methods. 4 ed., 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Cabannes, T., Vincentelli, M., Sundt, A., Signargout, H., Porter, E., Fighiera, V., Ugirumurera, J., Bayen, A., The impact of GPS-enabled shortest path routing on mobility: a game theoretic approach. Presented at Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting. Washington DC, USA. 7–11 January 2018, 2018.
17. Cammaerts, B., Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. Eur. J. Commun. 27:2 (2012), 117–134.
18. Cortade, T., A strategic guide on two-sided markets applied to the ISP market. Commun. Strateg. 61:1 (2006), 17–35.
19. Evans, D., Essays on the Economics of Two-Sided Markets: Economics, Antitrust and Strategy. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1714254, 2010.
20. de Lange, M., de Waal, M., Owning the City: New Media and Citizen Engagement in Urban Design. First Monday, special issue “Waves Bits And Bricks: Media & The Production of Urban Space”. 18 (10), 2013.
21. de Souza e Silva, A., Frith, J., Mobile Interfaces in Public Spaces: Locational Privacy, Control and Urban Sociability. 2012, Routledge, New York, NY.
22. de Valck, K. (2005). Virtual Communities of Consumption: Networks of consumer knowledge and companionship. Unpublished Ph.D., Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
23. Feenberg, A., Critical theory of communication technology: introduction to the special section. Inf. Soc. 25:2 (2009), 77–83, 10.1080/01972240802701536.
24. Finn, E., What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing. 2017, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
25. Gillespie, T., Politics of “Platforms”. New Media Soc. 12 (2010), 347–364, 10.1177/1461444809342738.
26. Gordon, R., The Rise and Fall of American Growth. 2016, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
27. Haas, T., Olsson, K., (eds.) Emergent Urbanism: Urban Planning & Design in Times of Structural and Systemic Change, 2014, Ashgate, Farnham.
28. Hagiu, A., Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55 (2014), 71–80.
29. Hartley, J., From the Consciousness Industry to Creative Industries: Consumer-Created Content, Social Network Markets and the Growth of Knowledge. Retrieved November 10, 2017 https://eprints.qut.edu.au/25955/, 2009.
30. Haklay, M., Beyond Quantification: We Need a Meaningful Smart City. Urban Pamphleteer #1: Future & Smart Cities. London, 2013. 2013.
31. Helmond, A., Platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(11), 2015, 10.1177/2056305115603080.
32. Hepp, A., Cultures of Mediatization. 2013, Polity Press, Cambridge.
33. Hind, S., Gekker, A., Outsmarting traffic, together: driving as social navigation, exchanges. Warwick Res. J., 1(2), 2014 (no p.n.).
34. Hatuka, T., Toch, E., The emergence of portable private-personal territory: smartphones, social conduct and public spaces. Urban Stud. 53:10 (2016), 2192–2208.
35. Kanazawa, S., The Intelligence Paradox: Why the Intelligent Choice isn't Always the Smart One. 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
36. Kitchin, R., Dodge, M., Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Komninos, N., Mora, L., Exploring the big picture of smart city research. Sci. Reg., 2018, 15–38 (ISSN 1720-3929).
38. Lammes, S., The map as playground: location-based games as cartographical practices. Think, Design, Play, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of DIGRA Conference, 2011, Utrecht, 2011, 1–10.
39. Lansdown, T., Individual differences & propensity to engage with in-vehicle distractions - a self-report survey. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 15 (2012), 1–8, 10.1016/j.trf.2011.09.001.
40. Lave, J., Wenger, E., Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Lindsay, G., Now Arriving: A Connected Mobility Roadmap for Public Transport. 2016, New Cities Foundation http://bit.ly/NCFConnectedMobility. (Accessed 2 September 2017)
42. Litman, T., Measuring transportation: traffic, mobility and accessibility. Inst. Transp. Eng. J. 73:10 (2003), 28–32.
43. Liu, J., Wei Shi, O.A., Elrahman, S., Xuegang, Ban, J., Reilly, J., Understanding social media program usage in public transit agencies. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 5 (2016), 83–92.
44. Livingstone, S., On the mediation of everything. ICA presidential address. J. Commun. 59:1 (2009), 1–18.
45. Livingstone, S. (2010). Youthful participation: what have we learned, what shall we ask next? In: First Annual Digital Media and Learning Conference: Diversifying Participation, 18–20 February 2010, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. (Unpublished).
46. Livingstone, S., The participation paradigm in audience research. Commun. Rev. 16:1–2 (2013), 21–30 (ISSN 1071-4421) https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.757174.
47. Lyons, G., Transport's digital age transition. J. Transp. Land Use 8:2 (2015), 1–19.
48. Mansell, R., Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation, and Governance. 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Mansell, R., The public's interest in intermediaries. Info 17:6 (2015), 8–18.
50. Morley, D., Communications and Mobility: The Migrant, the Mobile Phone, and the Container Box. 2017, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
51. New Cities Foundation, Connected Commuting: Research and Analysis on the New Cities Foundation Task Force in San Jose. http://www.newcitiesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/New-Cities-Foundation-Connected-Commuting-Full-Report.pdf, 2012. (Accessed 1 December 2017)
52. O'Reilly, T., What is Web 2.0. Retrieved 4 October, 2016, from See http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html, 2005.
53. OECD, Participative Web and User-Generated Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. 2007, OECD Publishing, Paris.
54. Palti, I., Defining conscious cities. J. Urban Des. Ment. Health, 1(1), 2016 https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/journal1-ipeditorial.html.
55. Ramirez, R. (2016). Spatial Practices/Digital Traces: Embodiment and Reconfigurations of Urban Spaces Through GPS Mobile Applications. The Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL. Unpublished PhD thesis.
56. Ramos, R., Driving screens: space, time, and embodiment in the use of Waze. Travis, C., von Lünen, A., (eds.) The Digital Arts and Humanities, 2016, Springer Geography, 139–150, 10.1007/978-3-319-40953-5_8.
57. Renaudin, V., Dommes, A., Guilbot, M., Engineering, human, and legal challenges of navigation systems for personal mobility. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18:1 (2017), 177–191.
58. Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J., Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1 (2003), 990–1029, 10.1162/154247603322493212.
59. Sassen, S., Does the city has Speech?. Haas, T., Olsson, K., (eds.) Emergent Urbanism: Urban Planning & Design in Times of Structural and Systemic Change, 2014, Ashgate, Farnham, 133–140.
60. Silber-Varod, V., Blau, I., Kis-Hacohen, R., Gender in shared navigation: men to mars, women to venus?. J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 2017, 10.1080/08874417.2017.1326090.
61. Silverstone, R., The sociology of mediation and communication. Calhoun, C.J., Rojek, C., Turner, B.S., (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Sociology, 2005, SAGE Publications, London, 188–207.
62. Srnicek, N., Platform Capitalism. 2017, Polity Press, Cambridge.
63. Striphas, T., Algorithmic Culture. Eur. J. Cult. Stud. 18:4–5 (2015), 395–412.
64. Townsend, A., Are we Heading Towards a Transport Planning Crisis?. https://newcities.org/re-programming-mobility-tech-industry-driving-us-towards-crisis-transportation-planning/, 2014. (Accessed 13 October 2017)
65. Tregua, M., Casbarra, C., When use meets content generation: the case of Waze. J. Int. Sci. Publ. Econ. Bus. 7:2 (2013), 95–106.
66. UNESCO, Kronberg Declaration on the Future of Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing. Retrieved October 15, 2017, from http://www.futureknowledge.org/background/Kronberg-Declaration.pdf, 2007.
67. Van Couvering, E., The political economy of new media revisited: platformisation, mediatisation, and the politics of algorithms. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017, 1812–1819 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41374.
68. van der Graaf, S., Social media. Mansell, R., Ang, P.H., (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, Wiley Blackwell-ICA Encyclopedias of Communication, 2015, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden and Oxford, UK, 1014–1026.
69. van der Graaf, S., ComMODify: User Creativity at the Intersection of Commerce and Community. 2018, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
70. van Dijck, J., Users like you: theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Cult. Soc. 31:1 (2009), 41–58.
71. van Dijck, J., Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media. 2013, Oxford University Press, New York.
72. van Dijck, J., Poell, T., De Waal, M., De Platformsamenleving: Strijd om Publieke Waarden in een Online Wereld. Amsterdam. 2016, University Press, Amsterdam.
73. von Hippel, E., Democratizing Innovation. 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
74. White, J., Anticipatory logics of the smart city's global imaginary. Urban Geogr. 37:4 (2016), 572–589.
75. Yin, E., Ansari, S., Akhtar, N., Radical innovation, paradigm shift and incumbent's dilemma: the case of the auto industry. Future Stud. Res. J. Trends Strateg. 9:1 (2017), 138–148.
76. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.