Gender in Shared Navigation: Men to Mars, Women to Venus?

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 171-177

  Silber Varod, Vered ^a   Blau, Ina ^a   Lis Hacohen, Ronit ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Gender differences; motives of drivers to adopt innovation; qualitative research; shared digital navigation app; ubiquitous information sharing; Waze

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS; HARDWARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DIGITAL NAVIGATION; GENDER DIFFERENCES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UBIQUITOUS INFORMATION; WAZE;

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 85041579296     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: 23802057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2017.1326090     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bauer, MW, Gaskell G., editors. Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound: A practical handbook for social research. London: Sage; 2000.
2. Blau I., E-collaboration within, between, and without institutions: Towards better functioning of online groups through networks. In: Kock N, editor. Interdisciplinary applications of electronic collaboration and technologies (Ch. 13, pp. 188–203). Texas A&M International University, USA: IGI Global Publishing; 2013.
3. Blau I, Hameiri M., Teachers-families online interactions and gender differences in parental involvement through school data system: Do mothers want to know more than fathers about their children? Comput Educ. 2012;59:701–709.
4. Blau I, Hameiri M., Ubiquitous mobile educational data management by teachers, students, and parents: Does technology change school-family communication and parental involvement? Educ Inf Technol. 2016;1–17. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9487-8.
5. Blau I, Mor N, Neuthal T., Interacting for learning: Digital portfolios for a learning community in a university course. Learn Media Technol. 2013;38(3):241–255.
6. Blau I, Neuthal T., Tweeting educational technology: A tale of professional community of practice. Int J Cyber-Society Educ. 2012a;5(1):75–80.
7. Blau I, Neuthal T., Twitter as a platform for an Israeli community of Information Science professionals. Issues Informing Sci Inf Technol. 2012b;9:177–186.
8. Blau I, Zuckerman O, Monroy-Hernández A., Children participation in media content creation community: Israelis learners in Scratch programming environment. In: Eshet-Alkalai Y, Caspi A, Eden S, Geri N, Yair Y, editors. Learning in the technological era. Ra’anana, Israel: The Open University of Israel; 2009. p. 65–72.
9. Blumler JG, Katz E., The uses of mass communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1974.
10. Bonnington C., (2013). Are men and women using mobile apps differently? Retrieved April 7, 2017 from https://www.wired.com/2013/04/men-women-app-usage/
11. Bruns A., Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc; 2008.
12. Chen X, Santos-Neto E, Ripeanu M., Crowd-based smart parking: a case study for mobile crowdsourcing. Paper presented at: 5th International Conference on MOBILe Wireless MiddleWARE, Operating Systems, and Applications (MOBILWARE 2012), Berlin, Germany.
13. Collier B, Bear J., (2012, February). Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia contributions. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, pp. 383–392.
14. Doan A, Ramakrishnan R, Halevy AY., Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Commun ACM. 2011;54(4):86–96.
15. Galton F., Vox populi (the voice of crowds). Nature 1907;75:450–451.
16. Gibton D., The theory based in the field: the meaning of the data analysis process research and theory in qualitative research. In: N. Tsabar Ben Yehoshua (Ed.) Traditions and currents in qualitative research. Tel Aviv: Dvir. [in Hebrew]; 2001. p. 195–227.
17. Gorsky P, Blau I., Online teaching effectiveness: A tale of two instructors. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2009;10:1–27.
18. Katz E, Blumler J, Gurevitch M., Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In: Blumler J, Katz E, editor. The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1974. p. 19–32.
19. Kern D, Schmidt A., Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM; 2009. p. 3–10.
20. Muscanell NL, Guadagno RE., Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28:107–112.
21. New Cities Foundation. (2012). Connected Commuting: Research and Analysis on the New Cities Foundation Task Force in San Jose. Retrieved October 30, 2013 from: http://www.newcitiesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/New-Cities-Foundation-Connected-Commuting-Full-Report.pdf
22. Niederer S, van Dijck J., Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media Soc. 2010;12(8):1368–1387.
23. Raubal M., Cogito ergo mobilis sum: the impact of location-based services on our mobile lives. In Nyerges T, Couclelis H, McMaster R, editors. The SAGE handbook of GIS and society. Los Angeles: Sage; 2011.p. 159–173.
24. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R., (Eds.). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2013.
25. Rubin AM., Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In: Bryant J, Zillmann D, editor. Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994. p. 417–436.
26. Sawers P., (2012). Gender differences: Men like system tools apps and women like Yahoo! Mail, apparently (Infographic). Retrieved April 7, 2017 from https://thenextweb.com/apps/2012/06/12/gender-differences-men-like-system-tools-apps-and-women-like-yahoo-mail-apparently-infographic/#.tnw_6OW9VdQg
27. Shen AX, Lee MK, Cheung CM, Chen H., Gender differences in intentional social action: we-intention to engage in social network-facilitated team collaboration. J Inf Technol. 2010;25(2):152–169.
28. Strauss AL, Corbin JM., Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications; 1990.
29. Surowiecki J., The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books; 2004.
30. Wasko MM, Faraj S., “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J Strategic Inf Syst. 2000;9(2):155–173.
31. Waze blog. 2010. Retrieved April 17: http://www.Waze.co.il/blog/tag/%d7%a0%d7%a9%d7%99%d7%9d/
32. Waze.com. Your Rank and point. Retrieved November 20 2015 from: https://www.waze.com/wiki/Your_Rank_and_Points.
33. Zuckerman O, Blau I, Monroy-Hernández A., Children’s participation patterns in online communities: An analysis of Israeli learners in the Scratch online community. Interdiscip J E-Learning Learn Objects 2009;5:263–274.