Engineering, Human, and Legal Challenges of Navigation Systems for Personal Mobility

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 177-191

  Renaudin, Valérie ^a   Dommes, Aurélie ^b   Guilbot, Michèle ^b  

^a Development and Networks   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

Design challenges; Navigation; Pedestrian navigation; personal data privacy; positioning technologies

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; LOCATION; MACHINERY; NAVIGATION; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS; DESIGN CHALLENGES; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; PEDESTRIAN NAVIGATION; PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION; PERSONAL NAVIGATION; PERSONAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; POSITIONING TECHNOLOGIES;

LOCATION BASED SERVICES;

EID: 84971575238     PISSN: 15249050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2563481     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. G. Menzies, 1421: The Year China Discovered America. NewYork, NY, USA: Herper Perennial, 2004.
2. C. Gentner et al., "Particle filter based positioning with 3GPP-LTE in indoor environments," in Proc. IEEE/ION PLANS, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA, 2012, pp. 301-308.
3. S. H. Shin, C. G. Park, and S. Choi, "New map-matching algorithm using virtual track for pedestrian dead reckoning," ETRI J., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 891-900, Dec. 2010.
4. T. S. Prentow et al., "Estimating common pedestrian routes through indoor path networks using position traces," in Proc. Int. Conf. MDM, 2014, pp. 43-48.
5. A. Virtanen, "Energy-based pedestrian navigation," in Proc. 20th ITS World Congr., Tokyo, Japan, 2013, pp. 1-9.
6. W. Tobler, Non-Isotropic Geographic Modelling. Orono, ME, USA: Nat. Center Geogr. Inf. Anal., 1993.
7. J. Rose and J. G. Gamble, Human Walking, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
8. R. E. Kalman, "A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems," ASME Trans., D, J. Basic Eng., vol. 82, pp. 35-45, 1960.
9. V. Renaudin, M. Susi, and G. Lachapelle, "Step length estimation using handheld inertial sensors," Sensors, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 8507-8525, 2012.
10. J. Jahn et al., "Comparison and evaluation of acceleration based step length estimators for handheld devices," in Proc. Int. Conf. IPIN, 2010, pp. 1-6.
11. V. Renaudin, V. Demeule, and M. Ortiz, "Adaptative pedestrian displacement estimation with a smartphone for free inertial navigation," in Proc. Int. Conf. IPIN, Montbeliard, France, 2013, pp. 916-924.
12. J. S. W. Storms and J. Raquet, "Magnetic field navigation in an indoor environment," in Proc. UPINLBS, Helsinki, Finland, 2010, pp. 1-10.
13. J. A. Farrell, Aided Navigation: GPS With High Rate Sensors. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
14. Google, Project Tango, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.google. com/atap/projecttango/
15. D. Vissiere, "Guidance, Navigation and Control Solutions for Unmanned Heterogeneous Vehicles in a Collaborative Mission," Math. Autom., Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris, France, 2008.
16. V. Renaudin and C. Combettes, "Magnetic, Acceleration Fields and Gyroscope Quaternion (MAGYQ) based attitude estimation with smartphone sensors for indoor pedestrian navigation," Sensors, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 22 864-22 890, 2014.
17. R. Mautz, "Indoor Positioning Technologies," Dept. Civil, Environ. Geomatic Eng., ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2012.
18. C. Combettes and V. Renaudin, "Comparison of misalignment estimation techniques between handheld device and walking directions," in Proc. Int. Conf. IPIN, Banff, AB, Canada, 2015, pp. 1-8.
19. M. L.McGuire, "An overview of gait analysis and step detection inmobile computing devices," in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. INCoS, 2012, pp. 648-651.
20. A.-M. Nivala, L. Tiina Sarjakoski, and T. Sarjakoski, "Usability methods' familiarity among map application developers," Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 784-795, 2007.
21. E. A.M. Van de Kar and A. Verbraeck, Designing Mobile Service Systems. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft Univ. Press, 2008.
22. A. Tricot, "Utility, usability and acceptability: An ergonomic approach to the evaluation of external representations for learning," in Proc. EARLI Symp. "Understand. Role External Represent. Support. learn.," Budapest, Hungary, 2007, pp. 1-24.
23. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
24. A. Dillon, User Acceptance of Information Technology, London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 2001.
25. F. D. Davis, "User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts," Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., vol. 38, pp. 475-487, 1993.
26. V. Venkatesh, "Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 11, pp. 342-365, 2000.
27. F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quart., vol. 13, pp. 319-340, 1989.
28. V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, "Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions," Decision Sci., vol. 39, pp. 273-315, 2008.
29. M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, and A. Stevens, Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation. Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate, 2014.
30. V. Radoczky, "How to design a pedestrian navigation system for indoor and outdoor environments," Location Based Services TeleCartography, G. Gartner, W. Cartwright, and M. Peterson, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 301-316.
31. T. Völkel, R. Kühn, and G.Weber, "Mobility impaired pedestrians are not cars: requirements for the annotation of geographical data," in Computers Helping People with Special Needs, K. Miesenberger, J.Klaus, W. Zagler, and A. Karshmer, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 1085-1092.
32. L. T. Sarjakoski and A.-M. Nivala, "Adaptation to Context-A way to improve the usability of mobile maps," Map-based Mobile Services: Theories, Methods and Implementations, L. Meng, T. Reichenbacher, and A. Zipf, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005, pp. 107-123.
33. J. Kjeldskov and J. Paay, "A longitudinal review of Mobile HCI research methods," in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Human-Comput. Interact. Mobile Devices Services, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 69-78.
34. A. Kaikkonen et al., "Usability testing of mobile applications: A comparison between laboratory and field testing," J. Usability Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4-16, 2005.
35. L. Meng, A. Zipf, and T. Reichenbacher, Map-Based Mobile Services. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
36. E. Park and J. Ohm, "Factors influencing users' employment of mobile map services," Telematics Informat., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 253-265, 2014.
37. M. Riebeck et al., "Studying the user acceptance of a mobile information system for tourists in the field," Inf. Technol. Tourism, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 189-199, 2008.
38. E. Rukzio et al., "Design, implementation and evaluation of a novel public display for pedestrian navigation: the rotating compass," in Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., Boston, MA, USA, 2009, pp. 113-122.
39. T. Heinroth and D. Buhler, "Arrigator-Evaluation of a speech-based pedestrian navigation system," in Proc. IET 4th Int. Conf. Intell. Environ., Seattle, WA, USA, 2008, pp. 1-4.
40. J. Goodman, S. Brewster, and P. Gray, "How can we best use landmarks to support older people in navigation?" Behvaiour Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3-20, 2005.
41. M. Li et al., "Evaluation of a mobile projector-based indoor navigation interface," Interacting Comput., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 595-613, Nov. 1, 2014.
42. A. J. May et al., "Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications," Personal Ubiquitous Comput., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 331-338, 2003.
43. A. Serra, D. Carboni, and V. Marotto, "Indoor pedestrian navigation system using a modern smartphone," in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Human Comput. Interact. Mobile Devices Services, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010, pp. 397-398.
44. C. Tsirmpas et al., "An indoor navigation system for visually impaired and elderly people based on Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)," Inf. Sci., vol. 320, pp. 288-305, 2015.
45. C. A. Lawton, "Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety," Sex Roles, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 765-779, 1994.
46. D. Head and M. Isom, "Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills," Behav. Brain Res., vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 49-58, 2010.
47. A. Dommes, A. Chevalier, and S. Lia, "The role of cognitive flexibility and vocabulary abilities of younger and older users in searching for information on the web," Appl. Cognit. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 717-726, 2011.
48. K. Rehrl et al., "Pedestrian navigation with augmented reality, voice and digital map: Results from a field study assessing performance and user experience," in Advances in Location-Based Services: 8th International Symposium on Location-Based Services, Vienna 2011, G. Gartner and F. Ortag, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2012, pp. 3-20.
49. R. Jacob et al., "Pedestrian navigation using the sense of touch," Comput., Environ. Urban Syst., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 513-525, 2012.
50. M. Pielot et al., "PocketNavigator: Studying tactile navigation systems insitu," in Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., Austin, TX, USA, 2012, pp. 3131-3140.
51. M. Pielot et al., "6th senses for everyone!: The value of multimodal feedback in handheld navigation aids," in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces, Alicante, Spain, 2011, pp. 65-72.
52. S. Bosman et al., "GentleGuide: An exploration of haptic output for indoors pedestrian guidance," in Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, L. Chittaro, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 358-362.
53. S. Paneels et al., "What's around me? Multi-actuator haptic feedback on the wrist," in Proc. IEEE WHC, 2013, pp. 407-412.
54. K. Tsukada and M. Yasumura, "ActiveBelt: Belt-type wearable tactile display for directional navigation," in UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, N. Davies, E. Mynatt, and I. Siio, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2004, pp. 384-399.
55. M. Pielot et al., "A tactile compass for eyes-free pedestrian navigation," in Proc. 13th IFIP TC Int. Conf. Human-Comput. Interact.-II, Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, pp. 640-656.
56. T. Amemiya and H. Sugiyama, "Design of a haptic direction indicator for visually impaired people in emergency situations," in Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler, and A. Karshmer, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 1141-1144.
57. F. Arab et al., "Haptic patterns and older adults: To repeat or not to repeat?" in Proc. IEEE WHC, 2015, pp. 248-253.
58. R. Scoble and S. Israel, L'ère du contexte. Ces nouvelles technologies qui bouleversent notre environnement. Paris, France: French Edition Diateino, 2014.
59. Renaud, Geo in Web: Best Geolocation Application on Android, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.geoinweb.com/2008/06/11/lesmeilleures-applications-de-golocalisation-sur-androd/
60. Le Monde, A Day of Digital Tracks in the Life of an Ordinary Citizen, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/infographie/ 2006/04/10/une-journee-de-traces-numeriques-dans-la-vie-d-uncitoyen-ordinaire-759979-3224.html
61. P. Sayer, "Study: Mobile phone apps view private data more than necessary," PC World, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2013.
62. "Regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation)," Eur. Parliament Council, Brussels, Belgium, Proposal for a Regulation 2012/0011, Jan. 25, 2012.
63. "The processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications)," Eur. Parliament Council, Brussels, Belgium, Directive 2002/58/EC, Jul. 12, 2002.
64. "Vie privée À l'horizon 2020," Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertes (CNIL), Paris, France, Paroles d'experts, Cahiers IP Innovation et prospective, vol. 1, 2012.
65. "French Law," Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertes (CNIL), Paris, France, 78-17, Art. 2, Jan. 6, 1978.
66. "The protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data," Eur. Parliament Council, Brussels, Belgium, Directive 95/46/EC, Oct. 24, 1995.
67. "Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data," Eur. Commiss., Brussels, Belgium, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 01248/07/EN WP 136, Jun. 20, 2007.
68. "Case C-70-10: Scarlet extended v. sabam," Court Justice Eur. Union, luxembourg, U.K., Judgment 3rd Chamber Court, Nov. 24, 2011.
69. "Opinion 13/2011 on geolocation services on smart mobile devices," Eur. Commiss., Brussels, Belgium, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 881/11/EN WP 185, Jun. 20, 2011.
70. S. Gambs, M. O. Killijian, and M. Nunez del Prado Cortez, "Deanonymization attack on geolocated data," in Proc. IEEE 12th Int. Conf. TrustCom, 2013, pp. 789-797.
71. D. Talbot, "How to mine cell-phone data without invading your privacy," MIT Technol. Rev., Big Sandy, TX, USA, 2013.
72. C. D, L'économie de la visibilité sur les réseaux sociaux d'Internet, Lien social et Internet dans l'espace privé. Paris, France: Academia/ L'Harmattan, 2012.
73. "Opinion 2/2017 on apps on smart devices," Eur. Commiss., Brussels, Belgium, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 00461/13/EN WP 202, Feb. 27, 2013.
74. M. Guilbot, F. Larcher, and M. Simeone, "Aspects Juridiques des Aides À la conduite (AJAR)," Direction de la recherche et de l'innovation Sousdirection de l'innovation-Bureau des grands programmes Tour Sequoia, La Defense, France, 2010.
75. European Court of Human Rights, "Case UZUN v. Germany," Judgment 5th Sect. Court, Strasbourg, France, Application no. 35623/05, Oct. 2, 2010.
76. French Court of Cassation, "Ruling 13-81948," Officiel gazette, Oct. 22, 2013.
77. French Court of Cassation, "Ruling 13-81945," Officiel gazette, Oct. 22, 2013.
78. "Opinion on the use of location data with a view to providing value-added services," Eur. Commiss., Brussels, Belgium, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 2130/05/ENWP 115, Nov. 2005.
79. "Opinion 10/2004 on More Harmonised Information Provisions," Eur. Commiss., Brussels, Belgium, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 11987/04/EN WP 100, Nov. 25th 2004.
80. "C-47/6," Eur. Commiss., Brussels, Belgium, Official Journal, Feb. 25, 2010.
81. A. Türk, La vie privée en péril. Paris, France: Odile Jacob, 2011.
82. "BS ISO/IEC 29151 Privacy impact assessment," Int. Org. Standard. (ISO), London, U.K., IST/33/-/5 Security Techn.-Identity Manage. Privacy Technol., 2016.
83. French Government, "Act on confidence in the digital economy," Act 2004-575, [revised on the Dec. 5th, 2015], 2004.
84. F. Pellerin, "Speech at the French National Assembly," presented at the Minister Delegate in Charge of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, of Innovation and Digital Economy, Paris, France, Jan. 30, 2014.
85. French Digital Council, Digital Ambition. For a French and European Policy Digital Transition, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://contribuez. cnnumerique.fr/sites/default/files/media/CNNum-rapport-ambitionnumerique. pdf
86. "Report on digital and fundamental rights," French Court of State, France, 2014.
87. G. Hornung and C. Schnabel, "Data protection in Germany I: The population census decision and the right to informational self-determination," Comput. Law Security Rep., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 84-88, 2009.
88. FING. SelfData Project, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://mesinfos.fing. org/english/.