The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research

Communication Review

Volumn 16, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 21-30

  Livingstone, Sonia ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875178805     PISSN: 10714421     EISSN: 15477487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2013.757174     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. 1998. Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination, London, England: Sage.
2. Bakardjieva, M. 2005. "Conceptualizing user agency". In Internet society: The Internet in everyday life, 9-36. London, England: Sage.
3. Bennett, W. L. 2008. "Changing citizenship in the digital age". In Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth, Edited by: Bennett, W. L. Vol. 1, 1-24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Berlin, I. 1958. Two concepts of liberty: An inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
5. Bird, S. E. 2003. The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world, New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Blumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M. and Katz, E. 1985. "Reaching out: A future for gratifications research". In Media gratifications research: Current perspectives, Edited by: Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A. and Palmgreen, P. 255-274. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Butsch, R. 2000. The making of American audiences: From stage to television, 1750-1990. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cammaerts, B. 2012. Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27: 117-134.
9. Carpentier, N. 2012. The concept of participation, if they have access and interact, do they really participate?. Communication Management Quarterly, 21: 13-36.
10. Couldry, N., Livingstone, S. and Markham, T. 2010. Media consumption and public engagement: Beyond the presumption of attention, 2nd, Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Dahlgren, P. 2012. Parameters of online participation: Conceptualising civic contingencies. Communication Management Quarterly, 21: 87-110.
12. Dufrasne, M. and Patriarche, G. 2011. Applying genre theory to citizen participation in public policy making: Theoretical perspectives on participatory genres. Communication Management Quarterly, 21: 61-86.
13. Fiske, J. 1992. Audiencing: A cultural studies approach to watching television. Poetics, 21: 345-359.
14. Hall, S. 1980. "Encoding/decoding". In Culture, media, language, Edited by: Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. and Willis, P. 128-138. London, England: Hutchinson.
15. Hepp, A. 2013. Cultures of mediatization, Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
16. Hoggart, R. 1957. The uses of literacy, London, England: Chatto and Windus.
17. Ito, M. 2009. Engineering play: A cultural history of children's software, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Jensen, K. B. 2009. Media convergence: the three degrees of network, mass, and interpersonal communication, London, England: Taylor & Francis.
19. Jermyn, D. and Holmes, S. 2006. The audience is dead: Long live the audience! Interactivity, "telephilia" and the contemporary television audience. Critical Studies in Television, 1: 49-57.
20. Johnson, R. 1986. What is cultural studies anyway?. Social Text, 16: 38-80.
21. Katz, E. 1980. On conceptualising media effects. Studies in Communication, 1: 119-141.
22. Lievrouw, L. A. and Livingstone, S. 2006. "Introduction to the updated student edition In". In Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs, Edited by: Lievrouw, L. A. and Livingstone, S. 1-14. London, England: Sage.
23. Livingstone, S. 2005. Audiences and publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere, Bristol, England: Intellect Press.
24. Livingstone, S. 2009a. Half a century of television in the lives of our children and families. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625: 151-163.
25. Livingstone, S. 2009b. On the mediation of everything. ICA presidential address. Journal of Communication, 59: 1-18.
26. Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. "Mediated frameworks for participation". In Transformation of representation: Essays in honour of Gunther Kress, Edited by: Pachler, N. and öck, M. B. New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Lowery, S. A. and DeFleur, M. L. 1983. Milestones in mass communication research, New York, NY: Longman.
28. Morley, D. 1986. Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure, London, England: Comedia.
29. Morley, D. 1992. Television, audiences and cultural studies, London, England: Routledge.
30. Nyre, L. 2009. Normative media research: Moving from the ivory tower to the control tower. Nordicom Review, 30: 3-17.
31. participation. 2013. In Merriam-Webster. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/participation (Accessed: 30 January 2013).
32. 2013. Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford, England: Oxford University. participation
33. Rosen, J. (2006). The people formerly known as the audience. http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html (http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html)
34. Scannell, P. 1988. "Radio times: The temporal arrangements of broadcasting in the modern world". In Television and its audience: International research perspectives, Edited by: Drummond, R. P. P. 15-31. London, England: British Film Institute.
35. Silverstone, R. 2005. "The sociology of mediation and communication". In The Sage handbook of sociology, Edited by: Calhoun, C. J., Rojek, C. and Turner, B. S. 188-207. London: Sage.
36. Spigel, L. 1992. Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Spitulnik, D. 2010. Millennial encounters with mainstream television news: Excess, void, and points of engagement. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20: 372-388.