Comparing student self-assessments of global communication with trained faculty and standardized patient assessments

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 779-784

  Pawluk, Shane Ashley ^a   Zolezzi, Monica ^a   Rainkie, Daniel ^a  

^a Qatar University ^*  (Qatar)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evaluation; Grading rubric; Self assessment; Standardized patient assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIKERT SCALE; NERVOUSNESS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PHARMACY STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; UNIVERSITY; ADULT; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; PHARMACY SCHOOL; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, PHARMACY; FEMALE; HUMANS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS, PHARMACY;

EID: 85049839795     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: 18771300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Engelhart, MD, Furst, EJ, Hill, WH, Krathwohl, DR, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Bloom, BS, (eds.), 1956, David McKay, New York.
2. Adrian, J, Zeszotarski, P, Ma, C, Developing pharmacy student communication skills through role-playing and active learning. Am J Pharm Educ, 79(3), 2015, 44.
3. Rickles, NM, Tieu, P, Myers, L, Galal, S, Chung, V, The impact of a standardized patient program on student learning of communication skills. Am J Pharm Educ, 73(1), 2009, 4.
4. Davies, ML, Schonder, KS, Meyer, SM, Hall, DL, Changes in student performance and confidence with a standardized patient and standardized colleague interprofessional activity. Am J Pharm Educ, 79(5), 2015, 69.
5. Shrader, S, Dunn, B, Blake, E, Phillips, C, Incorporating standardized colleague simulations in a clinical assessment course and evaluating the impact on interprofessional communication. Am J Pharm Educ, 79(4), 2015, 57.
6. Austin, Z, Gregory, PAM, Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students’ self-assessment skills. Am J Pharm Educ, 71(5), 2007, 89.
7. Wagner, ML, Suh, DC, Cruz, S, Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading. Am J Pharm Educ, 75(7), 2011, 130.
8. Mort, JR, Hansen, DJ, First-year pharmacy students’ self-assessment of communication skills and the impact of video review. Am J Pharm Educ, 74(5), 2010, 78.
9. Lundquist, LM, Shogbon, AO, Momary, KM, Rogers, HK, A comparison of students’ self-assessments with faculty evaluations of their communication skills. Am J Pharm Educ, 77(4), 2013, 72.
10. Fjortoft, N, Self-assessment in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ, 70(3), 2006, 64.
11. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy degree (“Standards 2016”). Published February 2015. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed 1 March, 2018.
12. Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada. AFPC Educational outcomes for first professional degree programs in pharmacy in Canada. Published June 2017. http://www.afpc.info/system/files/public/AFPC-Educational%20Outcomes%202017_final%20Jun2017.pdf. Accessed 1 March, 2018.
13. Hodges, B, McIlroy, JH, Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training. Med Educ 37:11 (2003), 1012–1016.
14. Abate, MN, Blommel, ML, Self-assessment tool for drug information advanced pharmacy practice experience. Am J Pharm Educ, 71(1), 2007, 02.
15. Hill, LH, Kirkwood, CK, Student and preceptor perception of performance in advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ, 69(4), 2005, 63.
16. Gordon, MJ, A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med 66:12 (1991), 762–769.
17. Parker, RW, Alford, C, Passmore, C, Can family medicine residents predict their performance on the in-training examination?. Fam Med 36:10 (2004), 705–709.
18. Woolliscroft, JO, TenHaken, J, Smith, J, Calhoun, JG, Medical students’ clinical self-assessments: comparisons with external measures of performance and the students’ self-assessments of overall performance and effort. Acad Med 68:4 (1993), 285–294.
19. Kruger, J, Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average” effect and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgements. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:2 (1999), 221–232.
20. Lau, E, Dolovich, L, Austin, Z, Comparison of self, physician and simulated patient ratings of pharmacist performance in a family practice simulator. J Interprof Care 21:2 (2007), 129–140.
21. Shirazi, M, Labaf, A, Monjazebi, F, et al. Assessing medical students’ communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients’ quality assurance. Acad Psychiatry 38:3 (2014), 354–360.
22. Macauley, KA., Psychometric Properties of Standardized Patient and Faculty Rater's Evaluations of Pre-Licensure Nursing Student Competencies., 2013, University of San Diego.
23. Watling, CJ, Kenyon, CF, Schulz, V, Goldszmidt, MA, Zibrowski, E, Lingard, L, An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Acad Med 85:7 (2010), 1157–1162.