Beneficial for some or for everyone? Exploring the effects of an autonomy-supportive intervention in the real-life classroom

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 210-234

  Flunger, Barbara ^a   Mayer, Axel ^b   Umbach, Nora ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c MTO   (Germany)

Author keywords

Achievement emotions; Autonomy support; Effort; Motivation; Motivational intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049470560     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: 19392176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000284     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers' beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 595-609. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0229.
2. Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students' need for autonomy. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). Boston, MA: Springer.
3. Assor, A., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Mapping the domain of autonomy support. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 101-120). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
4. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/00070990 2158883.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
6. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
7. Beisswingert, B. M., Zhang, K., Goetz, T., Fang, P., & Fischbacher, U. (2015). The effects of subjective loss of control on risk-taking behavior: The mediating role of anger. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 774. http://dx .doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00774.
8. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6740:: AID-SCE4-3.0.CO;2-3.
9. Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_4.
10. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2.
11. Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., & Stürmer, T. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 1149-1156. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/aje/kwj149.
12. Colichia, G., & Wiesner, H. (1998). Wärmeübertragung bei Tieren. Unterrichtsvorschläge für ein fachübergreifenden Unterricht [Heat transfer in animals. Lesson materials for an interdisciplinary instruction]. Physik in Der Schule, 36, 211-216.
13. Daniels, Z. (2008). Entwicklung schulischer Interessen im Jugendalter [Development of academic interests in adolescents]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann Verlag.
14. Daschmann, E. C., Goetz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 421-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709910X526038.
15. Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 22, 113-120.
16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self- determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
17. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook on motivation at school (pp. 171-196). New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Degracie, J. S., & Fuller, W. A. (1972). Estimation of the slope and analysis of covariance when the concomitant variable is measured with error. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 930-937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481321.
19. Denecke, I., Kirsch, T., & Schütt, D. (2007). Bausteine zum Thema Wärmeenergie [Modules for the topic heat transfer]. Hamburg, Germany: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg.
20. Devlieger, I., Mayer, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2016). Hypothesis testing using factor score regression: A comparision of four methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 741-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0013164415607618.
21. Devlieger, I., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). Factor score path analysis. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 13(Suppl. 1), 31-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614- 2241/a000130.
22. Duit, R., & Mikelskis-Seifert, S. (2010). Physik im Kontext. Konzepte, Ideen, Materialien für effizienten Physikunterricht [Physics in context. Concepts, ideals, and materials for efficient physics instruction]. Seelze, Germany: Friedrich Verlag.
23. Duit, R., Mikelskis-Seifert, S., & Wodzinski, C. T. (2007). Physics in context: A program for improving physics instruction in Germany. In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (pp. 599-629). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
24. Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 157-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709904X23411.
25. Flunger, B., Pretsch, J., Schmitt, M., & Ludwig, P. (2013). The role of explicit need strength for emotions during learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 241-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012 .10.001.
26. Freytag, K. (Ed.). (2007). Biologische Kurzversuche: Zoologie, Botanik, Mikroorganismen [Biological short-term experiments: Zoology, botanic, micro-organisms]. Köln, Germany: Aulis-Verlag Deubner.
27. Gaspard, H., Dicke, A. L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Häfner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents' value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1226-1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028.
28. Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Parrisius, C., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2017). Assessing task values in five subjects during secondary school: Measurement structure and mean level differences across grade level, gender, and academic subject. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 67-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.09.003.
29. Häußler, P., Hoffmann, L., Langeheine, R., Rost, J., & Sievers, K. (1996). Qualitative Unterschiede im Interesse an Physik und Konsequenzen für den Physikunterricht [Qualitative differences in physics interest and consequences for physics instruction]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 2, 57-69.
30. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107.
31. Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
32. Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880-895. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/a0019506.
33. Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067.
34. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588-600. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019682.
35. Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014241.
36. Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23, 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc .2012.09.002.
37. Koestner, R., & Losier, G. F. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 101-121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
38. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest en intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381-395. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007.
39. Kröhne, U. (2009). Estimation of average causal effects in quasiexperimental designs: Non-linear constraints in structural equation models (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Jena, Germany: Friedrich- Schiller-University.
40. Kurtz-Costes, B., Rowley, S. J., Harris-Britt, A., & Woods, T. A. (2008). Gender stereotypes about mathematics and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54, 386-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0001.
41. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x.
42. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23-44. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23.
43. Mayer, A., Dietzfelbinger, L., Rosseel, Y., & Steyer, R. (2016). The EffectLiteR Approach for Analyzing Average and Conditional Effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 374-391. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/00273171.2016.1151334.
44. Mayer, A., Nagengast, B., Fletcher, J., & Steyer, R. (2014). Analyzing average and conditional effects with multigroup multilevel structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 304. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3389/fpsyg.2014.00304.
45. Mayer, A., Umbach, N., Flunger, B., & Kelava, A. (2017). Effect Analysis Using Nonlinear Structural Equation Mixture Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 556-570. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1273780.
46. Minnaert, A., Boekaerts, M., & de Brabander, C. (2007). Autonomy, competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101, 574-586. http://dx.doi.org/10 .2466/pr0.101.2.574-586.
47. Mouratidis, A. A., Vansteenkiste, M., Sideridis, G., & Lens, W. (2011). Vitality and interest-enjoyment as a function of class-to-class variation in need-supportive teaching and pupils' autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 353-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022773.
48. Muckenfuß, H. (1995). Lernen im sinnstiftenden Kontext [Learning in meaningful contexts]. Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen.
49. Müller, F., Hanfstingl, B., & Andreitz, I. (2007). Skalen zur motivationalen Regulation beim Lernen von Schülerinnen und Schülern: Adaptierte und ergänzte Version des Academic Self- Questionnaire (SRQ-A) nach Ryan & Connell. [Scales of motivational learning regulation of students. Adapted and extended version of the academic Self-Regulation Questionnarie (SRQ-A) of Ryan and Connell], "in Wissenschaftliche Beiträge, Institut Für Unterrichts- Und Schulentwicklung (pp. 1-17). Klagenfurt, Austria: Alpen-Adria-Universität.
50. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144.
51. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World: Vol. 1. Analysis. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
52. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896-915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019545.
53. Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781.
54. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
55. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583-597. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0022-0663.98.3.583.
56. Pekrun, R., Götz, J., Julien, S., Zirngibl, A., Von Hofe, R., & Blum, W. (2002). Skalenhandbuch PALMA: 1. Messzeitpunkt (5. Klassenstufe) [Scale documentation of PALMA: 1. Measurement (5th grade)]. Munich, Germany: Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie, Universität München.
57. Pohl, S., Sengewald, M.-A., & Steyer, R. (2016). Adjustment when covariates are fallible. In W. Wiedermann & A. Von Eye (Eds.), Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research (pp. 363-383). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118947074.ch15.
58. Rakoczy, K., Buff, A., & Lipowsky, F. (2005). Befragungsinstrumente [Measurement instruments]. In E. Klieme, C. Pauli & K. Reusser (Hrsg.), Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerischdeutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis" [Documentation of the measurement of the Swiss-German video study. 'Educational quality, learn- ing behavior and mathematical understanding']. Materialien zur Bildungsforschung, Band 13 [Materials for educational research] (pp. 1-297). Frankfurt am Main: GFPF.
59. R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
60. Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational resources. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
61. Reeve, J. (2016). A grand theory of motivation: Why not? Motivation and Emotion, 40, 31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9538-2.
62. Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
63. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209.
64. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM .0000032312.95499.6f.
65. Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H.,. Wang, C. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 93-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0.
66. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). Boston, MA: Springer.
67. Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51, 146-163.
68. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more, Version 0.5-12 (BETA). Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Retrieved from http://lavaan.org/.
69. Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761.
70. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.
71. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.55.1.68.
72. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
73. Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 379-390. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379.
74. Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-222). New York, NY: Routledge.
75. Seibt, W. (2003). Physik für Mediziner [Physics for medicine]. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag.
76. Shen, B. (2015). Gender differences in the relationship between teacher autonomy support and amotivation in physical education. Sex Roles, 72, 163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0448-2.
77. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
78. Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/ 000709908X304398.
79. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
80. Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66, 563-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296196.
81. Steyer, R., Flory, F., Klein, A., Partchev, I., Yousfi, S., Müller, M., & Kröhne, U. (2005). Testing average effects in regression models with onteractions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
82. Su, Y. L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7.
83. Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460.
84. Tze, V. M. C., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2014). Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 175-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.001.
85. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1-35. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001.
86. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 3, pp. 1-44). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
87. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 55-75). New York, NY: Routledge.
88. Willems, A. S. (2011). Bedingungen des situationalen Interesses im Mathematikunterricht. Eine mehrebenenanalytische Perspektive [Conditions of situational interest in the math classes. A multilevel perspective]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
89. Yee, D. K., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317-333. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF00289840.
90. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to selfefficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51.
91. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. New York, NY: Springer U.S. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4.