Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise

Expertise in Mathematics Instruction: An International Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 17-39

  Chi, Michelene T H ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expertise trends; Perspective shift; Theoretical models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892232270     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7707-6_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Barron, B. (2000). Problem solving in video-based microworlds: Collaborative and individual outcomes of high achieving sixth grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 391-398.
2. Barrows, H. S., Norman, G. R., Neufeld, V. R., & Feightner, J. W. (1982). The clinical reasoning process of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 5, 49-56.
3. Binet, A. (1894). Psychologie des grands calculateurs et joueurs d'echecs. Paris: Hachette. [Republished by Slatkine Ressources, Paris, 1981.
4. Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (2009). It takes expertise to make expertise: Some thoughts about why and how and reflections on the themes. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 432-448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (1976). Short-term memory limitations in children capacity or processing deficits? Memory and Cognition, 4, 559-572.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
8. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 121-130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three kinds of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and ontological shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). New York: Routledge.
10. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Chi, M. T. H., & Hausmann, R. G. M. (2003). Do radical discoveries require ontological shifts? In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on innovation (pp. 430-444). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
13. Chi, M. T. H., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. M. (2008). Observing tutoring collaboratively: Insights about tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32(2), 301-341.
14. Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173.
15. Deakin, J. M., & Cobley, S. (2003). A search for deliberate practice: An examination of practice environment in figure skating and volleyball. In J. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert performance in sport: Recent advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 115-135). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
16. de Groot, A. D. (1966). Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research method and theory. New York: Wiley.
17. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Hardiman, P. T., & Mestre, J. P. (1992). Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition. Journal of the Learning Science, 2(3), 307-331.
18. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Group.
19. Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685-716.
20. Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1978). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685-706). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ericcson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesche-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
23. Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
24. Gott, S. P., Lesgold, A., & Kane, R. S. (1996). Tutoring for transfer of technical competence. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 33-48). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
25. Hashem, A., Chi, M. T. H., & Friedman, C. P. (2003). Medical errors as a result of specialization. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36, 61-69.
26. Hatano, G. (2003). Forward. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. xi-xiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Assume, K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York: Freeman.
28. Hausmann, R. G. M., Chi, M. T. H., & Roy, M. (2004). Learning from collaborative problem solving: An analysis of three dialogue patterns. Twenty-sixth Cognitive Science Proceedings. Chicago, IL.
29. Kozbelt, A. (2004). Creativity over the lifespan in classical composers: Reexamining the equal-odds rule. Paper presented at the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
30. Leas, R. L., & Chi, M. T. H. (1993). Analyzing diagnostic expertise of competitive swimming coaches. In J. Starkes (Ed.), Advances in psychology: Cognitive issues in motor expertise (pp. 75-94). New York: North-Holland.
31. Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. In M. T. H. Chi., R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311-342). Hillsdale, NJ/England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Martin, L., & Schwartz, D. (2009). Prospective adaptation in the use of external representations. Cognition & Instruction, 27, 38-400.
34. Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 49-96.
35. Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XV, pp. 3-44). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36. Neufeld, V. R., Norman, G. R., Barrows, H. S., & Feightner, J. W. (1981). Clinical problem solving by medical students: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis. Medical Education, 15, 315-322.
37. Pascual-Leone, J. (1978). Compounds, confounds, and models in developmental information processing: A reply to Trabasso and Foellinger. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26(1), 18-40.
38. Pfister, H., & Oehl, M. (2009). The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net-based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 161-176.
39. Ploetzner, R., Fehse, E., Kneser, C., & Spada, H. (1999). Learning to relate qualitative and quantitative problem representations in a model-based setting for collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 177-214.
40. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
41. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Towards the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 183-213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(11), 791-804.
44. Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 457-482.
45. Tweney, R. D. (1989). A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In B. Gholson & W. R. Shadish, Jr. (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 342-366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 607-651.