Application of Commercial Games for Home-Based Rehabilitation for People with Hemiparesis: Challenges and Lessons Learned

Games for Health Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 197-207

  Valdés, Bulmaro A ^a   Glegg, Stephanie M N ^b   Lambert Shirzad, Navid ^a   Schneider, Andrea N ^c   Marr, Jonathan ^a   Bernard, Renee ^a   Lohse, Keith ^d   Hoens, Alison M ^a   Van Der Loos, H F Machiel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c Department of Occupational Therapy ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral palsy; Hemiplegia; Serious games; Stroke rehabilitation; Technology adoption; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGED; CEREBRAL PALSY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEVICES; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INVENTION; MALE; PARESIS; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STROKE REHABILITATION; TELEREHABILITATION; UTILIZATION; VIDEO GAME;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; CEREBRAL PALSY; FEMALE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INVENTIONS; MALE; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPISTS; STROKE REHABILITATION; TELEREHABILITATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 85049008541     PISSN: 2161783X     EISSN: 21617856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0137     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation: An abridged version of a Cochrane review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51:497-506.
2. Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, et al. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One 2014; 9:e93318.
3. Valdés BA, Schneider AN, Van der Loos HFM. Reducing trunk compensation in stroke survivors: A randomized crossover trial comparing visual vs. force feedback modalities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98:1932-1940.
4. Brokaw EB, Lum PS, Cooper RA, Brewer BR. Using the Kinect to limit abnormal kinematics and compensation strategies during therapy with end effector robots. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Seattle, WA; 2013:1-6.
5. Clark RA, Pua YH, Bryant AL, Hunt MA. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining. Gait Posture 2013; 38:1064-1066.
6. Valdés BA, Shirzad N, Hung C-T, et al. Visualisation of two-dimensional kinematic data from bimanual control of a commercial gaming system used in post-stroke rehabilitation. International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). Valencia, Spain; 2015:243-250.
7. Lohse K, Shirzad N, Verster A, et al. Video games and rehabilitation: Using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther 2013; 37:166-175.
8. Zimmerli L, Jacky M, Lünenburger L, et al. Increasing patient engagement during virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94:1737-1746.
9. Lohse KR, Boyd LA, Hodges NJ. Engaging environments enhance motor skill learning in a computer gaming task. J Mot Behav 2016; 48:172-182.
10. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 2004; 36:212-224.
11. Shirzad N, Van der Loos HFM. Evaluating the user experience of exercising reaching motions with a robot that predicts desired movement difficulty. J Mot Behav 2016; 48:31-46.
12. Keetch KM, Lee TD. The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007; 78: 476-486.
13. Leiker AM, Bruzi AT, Miller MW, et al. The effects of autonomous difficulty selection on engagement, motivation, and learning in a motion-controlled video game task. Hum Mov Sci 2016; 49:326-335.
14. Saposnik G,Cohen LG,MamdaniM, et al. Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): A randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:1019-1027.
15. Lam MY, Tatla SK, Lohse KR, et al. Perceptions of technology and its use for therapeutic application for individuals with hemiparesis: Findings from adult and pediatric focus groups. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2015; 2:e1.
16. Tatla SK, Shirzad N, Lohse KR, et al. Therapists' perceptions of social media and video game technologies in upper limb rehabilitation. JMIR Serious Games 2015; 3:e2.
17. Shirzad N, Valdés BA, Hung C-T, et al. FEATHERS, a bimanual upper limb rehabilitation platform: A case study of user-centred approach in rehabilitation device design. International Conference on Engineering Design ICED. Milan, Italy; 2015:361-370.
18. Valdés BA, Hilderman CGE, Hung C-T, et al. Usability testing of gaming and social media applications for stroke and cerebral palsy upper limb rehabilitation. In: International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Chicago, IL; 2014:3602-3605.
19. Glegg SMN, Hung C-T, Valdés BA, et al. Kinecting the moves: The kinematic potential of rehabilitation-specific gaming to inform treatment for hemiplegia. Int J Child Heal Hum Dev 2016; 9:351-360.
20. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: A pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53:576-579.
21. Gutnick D, Reims K, Davis C, Gainforth H. Brief action planning to facilitate behavior change and support patient self-management. J Clin Outcomes Manag 2014; 21:18-29.
22. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3:77-101.
23. Glegg SMN, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Factors influencing therapists' adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16: 385-401.
24. Burke JW, McNeill MDJ, Charles DK, et al. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput 2009; 25:1085-1099.
25. Pietrzak E, Cotea C, Pullman S. Using commercial video games for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: Is this the way for the future? Top Stroke Rehabil 2014; 21:152-162.
26. Levac DE, Galvin J. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: Application of a classification framework. Dev Neurorehabil 2011; 14:177-184.
27. Levac D, Espy D, Fox E, et al. ''Kinect-ing'' with clinicians: Aknowledge translation resource to support decision making about video game use in rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2015; 95:426-440.
28. Saposnik G, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Ameta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 2011; 42:1380-1386.
29. Tatla SK, Jarus T, Virji-Babul N, Holsti L. The development of the Pediatric Motivation Scale for rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther 2014; 82:93-105.
30. Levac D, Glegg S, Miller P, Colquhoun H. Virtual reality and active video game-based practice, learning needs and preferences: A cross-canada survey of physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Games Heal 2017; 6:217-228.
31. Levac D, Glegg SMN, Sveistrup H, et al. A knowledge translation intervention to enhance clinical application of a virtual reality system in stroke rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:557.
32. Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, et al. A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: A case study from an industry perspective. Appl Ergon 2012; 43:184-190.
33. Glegg S, Holsti L, Stanton S, et al. Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2017; 12:217-226.
34. Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Demain SH, et al. Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: Users' perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:124-136.
35. Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, et al. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Inform Internet Med 2004; 29: 119-125.
36. Bassett SF. The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation. New Zeal J Physiother 2003; 31: 60-66.