Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 217-226

  Glegg, Stephanie M N ^a,b   Holsti, Liisa ^b   Stanton, Sue ^b   Hanna, Steven ^c   Velikonja, Diana ^d   Ansley, Barbara ^e   Sartor, Denise ^e   Brum, Christine ^e  

^a BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brain injury; knowledge translation; rehabilitation; technology adoption; theory of planned behaviour; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BRAIN INJURY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CONCEPT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ALLIED HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BRAIN INJURIES; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; SELF EFFICACY; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84954157670     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1111944     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Greenwald BD, Burnett DM, Miller MA., Congenital and acquired brain injury. 1. Brain injury:epidemiology and pathophysiology. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:S3–S7.
2. ABIKUS. [Internet]. ABIKUS evidence based recommendations for rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. Toronto, ON:ABIKUS Guideline Development Group; 2007; [cited 2011 Jul 3]. Available from:http://www.abiebr.com/abikus.
3. Cullen N, Meyer MJ, Aubut J, et al. [Internet]. Efficacy and models of care following an acquired brain injury. Evidence-based review of moderate to severe brain injury. 6th ed. Toronto, ON:ERABI Research Group; 2009; [cited 2011 Jul 3]. Available from http://www.abiebr.com/module/3-efficacy-and-models-care-following-acquired-brain-injury.
4. Sveistrup H., Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:10.
5. Toglia J, Kirk U., Understanding awareness deficits following brain injury. Neurorehabilitation. 2000;15:57–70.
6. Jaffe KM, Polissar L, Fay GC, et al. Recovery trends over three years following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:17–26.
7. Whyte J., Directions in brain injury research:from concept to clinical implementation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19:807–823.
8. Marshall S, Teasell R, Bayona N, et al. Motor impairment rehabilitation post acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21:133–160.
9. Weiss PL, Sveistrup H, Rand D, et al. Video capture virtual reality:a decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14:307–321.
10. Glegg SMN, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Using virtual reality in clinical practice:a multi-site exploratory study. Neurorehabilitation. 2014;35:563–577.
11. Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, et al. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:12–23.
12. Holden MK., Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation:review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:187–211
13. Glegg SMN, Tatla SK, Holsti L., The GestureTek virtual reality system in rehabilitation:a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol Technol. 2013;9:89–111.
14. Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, et al. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke:a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93318.
15. Health Professions Act [Internet]. Victoria, BC:Queen’s Printer; 2014 Dec 10; [cited 2014 Dec 31]. Available from:http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96183_01.
16. Taylor S, Todd PA., Understanding information technology usage:a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res. 1995;6:144–176.
17. Glegg SMN, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Factors influencing therapists' adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16:385–401.
18. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation:time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
19. Hutchinson A, Estabrooks CA., Educational theories. In:Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care:moving from evidence to practice. Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 206–214.
20. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID., Knowledge to action:what it is and what it isn’t. In:Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care:moving from evidence to practice. Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 3–9.
21. Scott SD, Albrecht L, O’Leary K, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/7/1/70
22. Jones CA, Roop SC, Pohar SL, et al. Translating knowledge in rehabilitation:systematic review. Phys Ther. 2015;95:663–667.
23. Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice:a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1024–1032.
24. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
25. Abdullah G, Rossy D, Ploeg J, et al. Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring as a knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence:a systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11:284–300.
26. Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R., Selecting, tailoring, and implementing knowledge translation interventions. In:Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care:moving from evidence to practice. Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 94–113.
27. Kramer TL, Pyne JM, Kimbrell TA, et al. Clinician perceptions of virtual reality to assess and treat returning veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:1153–1156.
28. Lotan M, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weiss PL., Training caregivers to provide virtual reality intervention for adults with severe intellectual and developmental disability. J Phys Ther Educ. 2011;25:15–19.
29. Markus LA, Willems KE, Maruna CC, et al. Virtual reality:feasibility of implementation in a regional burn center. Burns. 2009;35:967–969.
30. Annema J, Verstraete M, Abeele V, et al. Videogames in therapy:a therapist’s perspective. Fun Games. 2010;94–98.
31. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3:a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
32. Chau PYK, Hu PJ., Information technology acceptance by individual professionals:a model comparison approach. Decision Sci. 2001;32:699–719.
33. Farrow S, Reid D., Stroke survivors' perceptions of a leisure-based virtual reality program. Technol Disabil. 2004;16:69–81.
34. Galvin J, Levac D., Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation:describing and classifying virtual reality systems. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:112–122.
35. Miller S, Reid D., Doing play:competency, control, and expression. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6:623–632.
36. Sveistrup H, Thornton M, Bryanton C, et al. Outcomes of intervention programs using flatscreen virtual reality. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;7:4856–4858. San Francisco, CA:IEEE.
37. Lizarondo L, Grimmer-Somers K, et al. A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:261–272.
38. Rappolt S, Tassone M., How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:170–180.
39. Horner MS, Milam Miller S, Rettew DC, et al. Mentoring increases connectedness and knowledge:a cross-sectional evaluation of two programs in child and adolescent psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32:420–428.
40. Singh V, Bains D, Vinnicombe S., Informal mentoring as an organisational resource. Long Range Plann. 2002;35:389–405.
41. Bart O, Agam T, Weiss PL, et al. Using video-capture virtual reality for children with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1579–1586.
42. Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL., Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall:comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1710–1719.
43. Rand D, Weiss PL, Katz N., Training multitasking in a virtual supermarket:a novel intervention after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:535–542.
44. Reid D, Hirji T., The influence of a virtual reality leisure intervention program on the motivation of older adult stroke survivors:a pilot study. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2003;21:1–19.
45. Thornton M, Marshall S, McComas J, et al. Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury:perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Brain Inj. 2005;19:989–1000.
46. King G, Currie M, Bartlett DJ, et al. The development of expertise in pediatric rehabilitation therapists:changes in approach, self-knowledge, and use of enabling and customizing strategies. Dev Neurorehabil. 2007;10:223–240.
47. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation:a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:417–430.
48. Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, et al. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007;149:1–69.
49. Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R., Developing and selecting interventions for translating knowledge to action. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E85–E88.
50. Bates AW., Technology, open learning and distance education. London:Routledge; 1995.
51. Stanton S., Going the distance:developing shared web-based learning programmes. Occup Ther Int. 2001;8:96–106.