Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial

The Lancet Neurology

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1019-1027

  Saposnik, Gustavo ^a,c   Cohen, Leonardo G ^b   Mamdani, Muhammad ^c   Pooyania, Sepideth ^d   Ploughman, Michelle ^e   Cheung, Donna ^a   Shaw, Jennifer ^f   Hall, Judith ^c   Nord, Peter ^g   Dukelow, Sean ^h   Nilanont, Yongchai ⁱ   De los Rios, Felipe ^j   Olmos, Lisandro ^k   Levin, Mindy ^l   Teasell, Robert ^m   Cohen, Ashley ^c   Thorpe, Kevin ^c   Laupacis, Andreas ^c   Bayley, Mark ^f  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d Riverview Health Centre   (Canada)

^e MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^g University of Toronto McLaughlin Centre and Joint Centre for Bioethics   (Canada)

^h FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^j HOSPITAL NACIONAL CAYETANO HEREDIA   (Peru)

^k FLENI   (Argentina)

^l MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^m UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BARTHEL INDEX; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GRIP STRENGTH; HEADACHE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR FUNCTION TEST; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MYALGIA; NAUSEA; NEUROREHABILITATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANKIN SCALE; RECREATIONAL THERAPY; SEIZURE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; UPPER LIMB; VIRTUAL REALITY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; KINESIOTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECREATIONAL GAME; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION;

AGED; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; GAMES, RECREATIONAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84979656449     PISSN: 14744422     EISSN: 14744465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30121-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 1 Feigin, VL, Forouzanfar, MH, Krishnamurthi, R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 383 (2014), 245–254.
2. 2 Krishnamurthi, RV, Feigin, VL, Forouzanfar, MH, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health 1 (2013), e259–e281.
3. 3 Nichols-Larsen, DS, Clark, PC, Zeringue, A, Greenspan, A, Blanton, S, Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 36 (2005), 1480–1504.
4. 4 Feigin, VL, Mensah, GA, Norrving, B, Murray, CJ, Roth, GA, GBD 2013 Stroke Panel Experts Group. Atlas of the global burden of stroke (1990–2013): The GBD 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology 45 (2015), 230–306.
5. 5 Anjos, SM, Cohen, LG, Sterr, A, de Andrade, KN, Conforto, AB, Translational neurorehabilitation research in the third world: what barriers to trial participation can teach us. Stroke 45 (2014), 1495–1497.
6. 6 Langhammer, B, Stanghelle, JK, Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 14 (2000), 361–369.
7. 7 Logigian, MK, Samuels, MA, Falconer, J, Zagar, R, Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64 (1983), 364–367.
8. 8 Lord, JP, Hall, K, Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67 (1986), 88–91.
9. 9 van Vliet, PM, Lincoln, NB, Foxall, A, Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76 (2005), 503–508.
10. 10 Dimyan, MA, Cohen, LG, Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 7 (2011), 76–85.
11. 11 Jutai, JW, Teasell, RW, The necessity and limitations of evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 10 (2003), 71–78.
12. 12 Teasell, R, Meyer, MJ, McClure, A, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: an international perspective. Top Stroke Rehabil 16 (2009), 44–56.
13. 13 Henderson, A, Korner-Bitensky, N, Levin, M, Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 14 (2007), 52–61.
14. 14 Saposnik, G, Levin, M, Outcome Research Canada Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 42 (2011), 1380–1386.
15. 15 Laver, KE, George, S, Thomas, S, Deutsch, JE, Crotty, M, Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, 2015 CD008349.
16. 16 Broeren, J, Claesson, L, Goude, D, Rydmark, M, Sunnerhagen, KS, Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis 26 (2008), 289–296.
17. 17 Kwon, JS, Park, MJ, Yoon, IJ, Park, SH, Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation 31 (2012), 379–385.
18. 18 Cho, K, Yu, J, Jung, J, Effects of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on upper extremity function and visual perception in stroke patients: a randomized control trial. J Phys Ther Sci 24 (2012), 1205–1208.
19. 19 Lohse, KR, Hilderman, CG, Cheung, KL, Tatla, S, Van der Loos, HF, Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PloS ONE, 9, 2014, e93318.
20. 20 Billinger, SA, Arena, R, Bernhardt, J, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 45 (2014), 2532–2553.
21. 21 Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehab Res Devel 47 (2010), 1–43.
22. 22 Dawson, AS, Knox, J, McClure, JA, Foley, N, Teasell, R, Stroke Best Practice Working Group. Stroke rehabilitation. http://strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/SBP2013_Stroke-Rehabilitation-Update_July-10_FINAL.pdf, 2013 (accessed Nov 28, 2015).
23. 23 Barreca, S, Wolf, SL, Fasoli, S, Bohannon, R, Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 17 (2003), 220–306.
24. 24 Gowland, C, Stratford, P, Ward, M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 24 (1993), 58–63.
25. 25 Bogard, K, Wolf, S, Zhang, Q, Thompson, P, Morris, D, Nichols-Larsen, D, Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 (2009), 422–428.
26. 26 Saposnik, G, Teasell, R, Mamdani, M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke 41 (2010), 1477–1484.
27. 27 Lin, KC, Hsieh, YW, Wu, CY, Chen, CL, Jang, Y, Liu, JS, Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 (2009), 429–434.
28. 28 Teasell, R, Rice, D, Richardson, M, et al. The next revolution in stroke care. Expert Rev Neurother 14 (2014), 1307–1314.
29. 29 Langhorne, P, Coupar, F, Pollock, A, Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 8 (2009), 741–754.
30. 30 Han, CE, Arbib, MA, Schweighofer, N, Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold. PLoS Comput Biol, 4, 2008, e1000133.
31. 31 Mousavi Hondori, H, Khademi, M, Dodakian, L, McKenzie, A, Lopes, CV, Cramer, SC, Choice of human–computer interaction mode in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30 (2016), 258–265.
32. 32 Lo, AC, Guarino, PD, Richards, LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 1772–1783.
33. 33 Duncan, PW, Sullivan, KJ, Behrman, AL, et al. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 364 (2011), 2026–2036.
34. 34 Dromerick, AW, Lang, CE, Birkenmeier, RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology 73 (2009), 195–201.