The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: Early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 199-208

  Wilcox, Rebecca L ^a   Adem, Patricia V ^b   Afshinnekoo, Ebrahim ^b   Atkinson, James B ^c   Burke, Leah W ^a   Cheung, Hoiwan ^d   Dasgupta, Shoumita ^e   Delagarza, Julia ^b   Joseph, Loren ^f   Legallo, Robin ^g   Lew, Madelyn ^h   Lockwood, Christina M ⁱ   Meiss, Alice ^g   Norman, Jennifer ^j   Markwood, Priscilla ^j   Rizvi, Hasan ^k   Shane Carson, Kate P ^l   Sobel, Mark E ^m   Suarez, Eric ⁿ   Tafe, Laura J ^d   Wang, Jason ^o   Haspel, Richard L ^f   more..

^a FLETCHER ALLEN HEALTH CARE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j Association of Pathology Chairs   (United States)

^k QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^l OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m American Society for Investigative Pathology   (United States)

ⁿ UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

active learning; curricula; genetics; genomics; interprofessional; medical education; NCI; precision medicine

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; CURRICULUM; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROCEDURES;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PHYSICIANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 85048897483     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0077     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Kris MG, Johnson BE, Berry LD et al. Using multiplexed assays of oncogenic drivers in lung cancers to select targeted drugs. JAMA 311(19), 1998-2006 (2014).
2. Mody RJ, Wu YM, Lonigro RJ et al. Integrative clinical sequencing in the management of refractory or relapsed cancer in youth. JAMA 314(9), 913-925 (2015).
3. Lowy DR, Collins FS. Aiming high: changing the trajectory for cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 374(20), 1901-1904 (2016).
4. Spear BB, Heath-Chiozzi M, Huff J. Clinical application of pharmacogenetics. Trends Mol. Med. 7(5), 201-204 (2001).
5. Wilson MR, Naccache SN, Samayoa E et al. Actionable diagnosis of neuroleptospirosis by next-generation sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 370(25), 2408-2417 (2014).
6. Worthey EA, Mayer AN, Syverson GD et al. Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease. Genet. Med. 13(3), 255-262 (2011).
7. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 369(16), 1502-1511 (2013).
8. National Cancer Institute. NCI and the Precision Medicine Initiative. www.cancer.gov/research/areas/treatment/pmi-oncology
9. Varmus H. Getting ready for gene-based medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(19), 1526-1527 (2002).
10. Houwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L et al. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Fam. Pract. 12(5), 1-9 (2011).
11. Rinke ML, Mikat-Stevens N, Saul R et al. Genetic services and attitudes in primary care pediatrics. Am. J. Med. Genet. Pt A 164A(2), 449-455 (2014).
12. Selkirk CG, Weissman SM, Anderson A, Hulick PJ. Physicians' preparedness for integration of genomic and pharmacogenetic testing into practice within a major healthcare system. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 17(3), 219-225 (2013).
13. Ginsburg GS. Genomic medicine: 'grand challenges' in the translation of genomics to human health. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 16(8), 873-874 (2008).
14. Kotzer KE, Riley JD, Conta JH, Anderson CM, Schahl KA, Goodenberger ML. Genetic testing utilization and the role of the laboratory genetic counselor. Clin. Chim. Acta 427, 193-195 (2014).
15. Miller CE, Krautscheid P, Baldwin EE et al. Genetic counselor review of genetic test orders in a reference laboratory reduces unnecessary testing. Am. J. Med. Genet. 164A(5), 1094-1101 (2014).
16. Klitzman R, Chung W, Marder K et al. Attitudes and practices among internists concerning genetic testing. J. Genet. Couns. 22(1), 90-100 (2013).
17. Haga SB, Burke W, Ginsburg GS, Mills R, Agans R. Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clin. Genet. 82(4), 388-394 (2012).
18. Musunuru K, Haspel RL. Improving genomic literacy among cardiovascular practitioners via a flipped-classroom workshop at a national meeting. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 9(3), 287-290 (2016).
19. Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA et al. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 91(3), 450-458 (2012).
20. Laedtke AL, O'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Vogel KJ. Family physicians' awareness and knowledge of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA). J. Genet. Couns. 21(2), 345-352 (2012).
21. McGrath S, Ghersi D. Building towards precision medicine: empowering medical professionals for the next revolution. BMC Med. Genomics 9(23), 1-6 (2016).
22. Korf BR, Berry AB, Limson M et al. Framework for development of physician competencies in genomic medicine: report of the Competencies Working Group of the Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Physician Education in Genomics. Genet. Med. 16(11), 804-809 (2014).
23. Korf BR. The medical genetics residency milestones. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 6(Suppl. 1), 87-90 (2014).
24. Laudadio J, McNeal JL, Boyd SD et al. Design of a genomics curriculum: competencies for practicing pathologists. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 139(7), 894-900 (2015).
25. Aisner DL, Berry A, Dawson DB, Hayden RT, Joseph L, Hill CE. A suggested molecular pathology curriculum for residents: a report of the association for molecular pathology. J. Mol. Diagn. 18(2), 153-162 (2016).
26. Haspel RL, Atkinson JB, Barr FG et al. TRIG on TRACK: educating pathology residents in genomic medicine. Per. Med. 9(3), 287-293 (2012)
27. Haspel RL, Ali AM, Huang GC. Using a team-based learning approach at national meetings to teach residents genomic pathology. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 8(1), 80-84 (2016).
28. Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group. Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG). http://pathologylearning.org/trig
29. Huggett KN, Jeffries WB. An Introduction to Medical Teaching(2nd Ed.). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (2014).
30. Bonwell CC, Eison JA. Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. In: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA (1991).
31. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8410-8415 (2014).
32. Lorenzo M, Crouch CH, Mazur E. Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. Am. J. Phys.74, 118-122 (2006).
33. Gross D, Pietri ES, Anderson G, Moyano-Camihort K, Graham MJ. Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 14(4), ar36 (2015).
34. Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science 332, 1213-1216 (2011).
35. Manolio T, Ward R, Ginsburg GS. Clinical implementation of genomic medicine: the importance of global collaboration-editorial. Expert Rev. Precis. Med. Drug Dev. 1(4), 349-351 (2016).
36. Nelson EA, McGuire AL. The need for medical education reform: genomics and the changing nature of health information. Genome Med. 2(18), 1-3 (2010).
37. Plunkett-Rondeau J, Hyland K, Dasgupta S. Training future physicians in the era of genomic medicine: trends in undergraduate medical genetics education. Genet. Med. 17(11), 927-934 (2015).
38. Hyland KM, Dasgupta S, Garber KB et al. APHMG medical school core curriculum in genetics. http://media.wix.com/ugd/3a7b87 7064376a9eb346cfa1b85bc2f137c48f.pdf
39. Knollmann-Ritschel BEC, Regula DP, Borowitz MJ, Conran R, Prystowsky MB. Pathology competencies for medical education and educational cases. Acad. Pathol. 4, 1-36 (2017).
40. Association of American Medical Colleges. Use of instructional methods by US and Canadian medical schools. www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/456458/ci07.html
41. Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical schools reporting use of selected teaching formats in 2013-2014, by topic area. www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/406470/06c.html
42. Prober CG, Health C. Lecture halls without lectures-A proposal for medical education. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(18), 1657-1659 (2012).
43. Schwartzstein RM, Roberts DH. Saying goodbye to lectures in medical school-paradigm shift of passing fad? N. Engl. J. Med. 377(7), 605-607 (2017).
44. Prunuske AJ, Batzli J, Howell E, Miller S. Using online lectures to make time for active learning. Genetics 192(1), 67-72 (2012).
45. Miller CJ, Metz MJ. A comparison of professional-level faculty and student perceptions of active learning: its current use, effectiveness and barriers. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 38(3), 246-252 (2014).
46. Michael J. Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning. Coll. Teach. 55(2), 42-47 (2007).
47. Haspel RL, Rinder HM, Frank KM et al. The current state of resident training in genomic pathology: a comprehensive analysis using the resident in-service examination. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 142(4), 445-451 (2014).
48. National Board of Medical Educators (NBME). Exam content outline. www.nbme.org/Schools/Subject-Exams/Subjects/basicsci bio.html