Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance;Dreidimensionale skelettale, dentoalveoläre und temporomandibuläre Gelenkveränderungen nach Behandlung mit der Twin-Block-Apparatur

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 245-258

  Elfeky, Hanem Younes ^a   Fayed, Mona Salah ^b   Alhammadi, Maged Sultan ^c   Soliman, Sanaa Abou Zeid ^b   El Boghdadi, Dalia Mohamed ^b  

^a 61519   (Egypt)

^b Cairo University   (Egypt)

^c JAZAN UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Class II malocclusion; Cone beam computed tomography; Functional orthopedic appliance; Temporomandibular joint; Twin Block

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE; HUMAN; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85045458154     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-018-0137-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Al-Saleh M, Alsufyani N, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major P (2015) Changes in temporomandibular joint morphology in class II patients treated with fixed mandibular repositioning and evaluated through 3D imaging: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 18:185–201
2. Alhammadi M, Fayed M, Labib A (2017) Three-dimensional assessment of condylar position and joint spaces after maxillary first premolar extraction in skeletal class II malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res 20:71–78
3. Alhammadi MS, Fayed MS, Labib A (2016) Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joints in skeletal class I, class II, and class III malocclusions: cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Fed Orthod 5:80–86
4. Alhammadi MS, Shafey AS, Fayed MS, Mostafa YA (2014) Temporomandibular joint measurements in normal occlusion: a three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Fed Orthod 3:155–162
5. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA (2000) Treatment timing for twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:159–170
6. Bowen L, Yanmin W, Fang S, Min L, Ying D, Li Z (2013) Cone-beam CT evaluation of the changes in the temporomandibular joint of patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion before and after Twin-block treatment. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 31:610–614
7. Chavan SJ, Bhad WA, Doshi UH (2014) Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in twin block and bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Prog Orthod 15:57
8. Clark W (2014) Twin block functional therapy. JP Medical Ltd, London
9. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen G (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625
10. Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C (2014) Short-term treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 37:170–176
11. Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Salah Fayed MM, Attia KH, Rahman Ishaq RA, Mostafa YA (2015) Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant—anchored forsus fatigue resistant device: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 86:292–305
12. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazão DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR (2011) Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 81:26–35
13. Henry R (1957) A classification of class II, division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 27:83–92
14. Ivorra-Carbonell L, Montiel-Company J‑M, Almerich-Silla J‑M, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcís C (2016) Impact of functional mandibular advancement appliances on the temporomandibular joint—a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21:e565–e572
15. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2005) Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of twin-block appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent 29:225–230
16. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2006) Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:594–602
17. LeCornu M, Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu C‑D, Larson B, Nguyen T (2013) Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:818–830
18. Lund DI, Sandler PJ (1998) The effects of twin blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:104–110
19. Jr McNamara JA (1981) Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51:177–202
20. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ (1998) Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:15–24
21. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ (2000) Posttreatment changes after successful correction of class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:24–33
22. Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT (1998) A prospective evaluation of bass, Bionator and twin block appliances. Eur J Orthod 20:663–684
23. Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, Wainright RL, Bookstein FL (1980) Differential diagnosis of class II malocclusions: part 1. Facial types associated with class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 78:477–494
24. O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243
25. Pinheiro F (2015) Twin block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:636
26. Proffit WR, Fields H Jr, Moray L (1997) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13:97–106
27. Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H (2001) Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 71:4–11
28. Saikoski LZ, Cançado RH, Valarelli FP, KMSd F (2014) Dentoskeletal effects of class II malocclusion treatment with the twin block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study. Dental Press J Orthod 19:36–45
29. Sharma A, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya B (2012) Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of twin block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 30:218–226
30. Sidlauskas A (2005) The effects of the twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in class II division 1 malocclusion. Medicina (Kaunas) 41:392–400
31. Singh G, Hodge M (2002) Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block appliances. Angle Orthod 72:402–409
32. Toth LR, McNamara JA (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:597–609
33. Trenouth M (2000) Cephalometric evaluation of the twin-block appliance in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117:54–59
34. Trenouth M (2002) Proportional changes in cephalometric distances during twin block appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 24:485–491
35. Varlık SK, Gültan A, Tümer N (2008) Comparison of the effects of twin block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod 30:128–134
36. Vedavathi H, Chirag A (2016) Comparative assessment of condylar changes in patients treated with twin block appliance: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 15:1–7
37. Yildirim E, Karacay S, Erkan M (2014) Condylar response to functional therapy with twin-block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 84:1018–1025