Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of twin-block appliance

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 225-230

  Jena, Ashok Kumar ^a   Duggal, Ritu ^a   Parkash, Hari ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIA; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHOPEDICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH DEVELOPMENT; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 18844421100     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.3.c33050g516406336     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. White L. Early orthodontic intervention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 24-28, 1998.
2. Schmuth GPF. Milestones in the development and practical application of functional appliances. Am J Orthod 84: 48-53, 1983.
3. Balters W. Die Technik und Ubung der allgemeinen und speziellen Bionator-Therapie. Quintessenz 1: 77, 1964.
4. Teuscher U. A growth related concept for skeletal Class II treatment. Am J Orthod 74: 258-275, 1978.
5. Eirow HL. The Bionator. Br J Orthod 8: 33-36, 1981.
6. Bimler HP. Dr H. P. Bimler on functional appliances. J Clin Orthod 17: 39-49, 1983.
7. Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique. Am J Orthod 93: 1-18, 1988.
8. Clark WB. The Twin-block traction techniques. Eur J Orthod 4: 129-138, 1982.
9. Johnston LE Jr. Balancing the books on orthodontic treatment: An integrated analysis of change. Br J Orthod 23: 93-102, 1996.
10. Hotz R. Application and appliance manipulation of functional forces. Am J Orthod 58: 459-478, 1970.
11. Toth LR, McNamara JA. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116: 597-609, 1999.
12. Turner N, Gultan AS. Comparison of the effects of Monoblock and Twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116: 460-468, 1999.
13. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the Twin-block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118: 24-33, 2000.
14. Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117: 54-59, 2000.
15. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjil Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124: 234-243, 2003.
16. Trenouth MJ. Proportional changes in cephalometric distance during Twin-block appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 24: 485-491, 2002.
17. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I- the hard tissues. Eur J Orthod 20: 501-516, 1998.
18. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of Twin-block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114: 15-24, 1998.
19. Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin-blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 104-110, 1998.
20. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 76: 423-442, 1979.
21. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of Class II malocclusions with headgear Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 86: 1-13, 1984.
22. Falck F, Frankel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Frankel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96: 333-341, 1989.
23. Haynes S. A cephalometric study of mandibular changes in modified functional regulator (Frankel) treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 90: 308-320, 1986.
24. Wieslander L, Lagerstrom L. The effects of activator treatment on Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 75: 20-26, 1979.
25. Harvold EP, Vargervik K. Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. Am J Orthod 60: 478-490, 1971.
26. Rushforth CDJ, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator. Br J Orthod 26: 127-134, 1999.
27. Tulloch JFC, Philips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phased randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 62-72, 1998.
28. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionator and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 40-50, 1998.
29. Gafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 51-61, 1998.
30. Tsamtsouris A, Vedrenne D. The use of the bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition. J Pedod 8: 78-100, 1983.
31. Janson IA. A cephalometric study of the efficiency of the bionator. Trans Europ Orthod Soc 28: 282-298, 1977.
32. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JM. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118: 159-170, 2000.