Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1018-1025

  Yildirim, Ersin ^a   Karacay, Seniz ^a   Erkan, Mustafa ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Condyle; Cone beam computed tomography; Functional orthopedic appliance; Temporomandibular joint; Twin Block

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OVERBITE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROGNATHIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELLA TURCICA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; OVERBITE; RETROGNATHIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELLA TURCICA; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 84908879532     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/112713-869.1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:437-446.
2. Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:4-11.
3. Pancherz H, Fischer S. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:493-501.
4. Dixon D. Radiographic diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders. In: Sadowsky PL, Laskin DM, eds. Seminars in Orthodontics: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: Fact or Fiction. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995:207-221.
5. Uematsu H, Ichida T, Masumi S, et al. Diagnostic image analyses of activator treated temporomandibular joint in growth and maturing stages. Cranio. 2002;20:254-263.
6. Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joint in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:27-35.
7. Arici S, Akan H, Yakubov K, Arici N. Effects of fixed functional appliance treatment on the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:809-814.
8. Chintakanon K, Sampson W, Wilkinson T, Toensend G. A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:494-504.
9. Arat ZM, Gökalp H, Erdem D, Erden I. Changes in TMJ disccondyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;19:316-319.
10. Wadhawan N, Kumar S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sharma R. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:235-250.
11. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovich P. Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75-80.
12. Mah KJ, Huang JC, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:7S-13S.
13. Huntjens E, Kiss G, Wouters C, Carels C. Condylar asymmetry in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:545-551.
14. Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:28-38.
15. Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin ÖS, Küc¸ük M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;81:12812-1816.
16. Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K, Hotokezaaka. Using superim-position of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images with surface-based registration. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34:361-367.
17. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:19-25.
18. Cevidanes LHS, Steyner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:611-618.
19. Cevidanes LHS, Bailey LJ, Tucker SF, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:44-50.
20. Cevidanes LHS, Heymann G, Cornelis MA, DeClerck HJ, Tulloch JFC. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:94-99.
21. Lee JH, Kim MJ, Kim SM, Kwon OH, Kim YK. The 3D superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessment of oral and maxillofacial surgery treatment results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2012;114:167-174.
22. LeCornu M, Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu CD, Larson B, Nguyen T. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:818-830.
23. Hino CT, Cevidanes LH, Nguyen TT, De Clerck HJ, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:705-714.
24. Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Paniagua B, Zhu H, Koerich L, De Clerck H. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:329-336.
25. De Clerck H, Nguyen T, de Paula LK, Cevidanes L. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:25-31.
26. Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, Heymann G, de Paula LK, De Clerck H. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:790-798.
27. McDavid WD, Tronje G, Welander U, Morris CR. Dimensional reproduction in rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;62:96-101.
28. Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:627-637.
29. Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J. 2003;19:67-75.
30. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:410-416.
31. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurement with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:803-811.
32. Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, et al. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison with panoramic radiography and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:429-438.
33. Arat ZM, Rübendüz M, Akgül AA. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:374-380.
34. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of Facial Growth. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Sanders Company; 1996:57-77.
35. Lund DL, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a retrospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:104-110.
36. Mills C, McCulloch K. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:15-24.
37. Toth LR, Mc Namara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:597-609.
38. Bacetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, Namara JA Jr. treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:159-170.
39. Güner DD, Ozturk Y, Sayman HB. Evaluation of the effects of functional orthopedic treatment on temporomandibular joints with single-photon emission computerized tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:9-12.
40. Paulsen HU, Karle A. Computer tomographic and radiographic changes in the temporomandibular joints of two young adults with occlusal asymmetry, treated with Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:649-656.