A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II - The soft tissues

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 663-684

  Morris, David O ^a,b   Illing, Heather M ^a   Lee, Robert T ^a  

^a ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FACE; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; EVALUATION STUDIES; FACE; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0032239612     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.6.663     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Ahlgren J, Laurin C 1976 Late results of activator-treatment: a cephalometric study. British Journal of Orthodontics 3: 181-187
2. Balters W 1964 Die Technik und Übung der allgemeinen und speziellen Bionator-therapie. Quintessenz 15: 77-85
3. Bass N M 1983a Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part I. American Journal of Orthodontics 84: 361-383
4. Bass N M 1983b Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part II. American Journal of Orthodontics 84: 466-490
5. Bass N M 1987 Bass orthopedic appliance system. Part 1 Design and construction. Part 2 Diagnosis and appliance prescription. Part 3 Case management. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 21: 254-265, 312-320, 384-394
6. Battagel J M 1989 Profile changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions: a comparison of the effects of Edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy. European Journal of Orthodontics 11: 243-253
7. Battagel J M 1990 The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques. European Journal of Orthodontics 12: 154-165
8. Battagel J M 1993 A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 305-314
9. Birkebæk L, Melsen B, Terp S 1984 A laminographic study of alterations in the temporomandibular joint following activator treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 6: 257-266
10. Bolmgren G A, Moshiri F 1986 Bionator treatment in Class II division 1. Angle Orthodontist 56: 255-262
11. British Standards Institution 1983 British standard glossary of dental terms. BS 4492. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London
12. Burstone C J, James R B, Legan H, Murphy G A, Norton L A 1978 Cephalometics for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery 36: 269-277
13. Calvert F J 1982 An assessment of Andresen therapy on Class II division 1 malocclusion. British Journal of Orthodontics 9: 149-153
14. Clark W J 1982 The twin block traction technique. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 129-138
15. Clark W J 1988 The twin block technique: a functional orthopedic appliance system. American Journal of Orthodontics 93: 1-18
16. Clark W J 1995 Twin block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopaedics. Mosby-Wolfe, London, pp. 20-22, 76, 134
17. Cohen A M 1983 Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/1 malocclusions. British Journal of Orthodontics 10: 147-153
18. Coward T J, Watson R M, Scott B J J 1997 Laser scanning for the identification of repeatable landmarks of the ears and face. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 50: 308-314
19. Cura N, Saraç M, Öztürk Y, Sürmeli N 1996 Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of activator, activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 36-45
20. Dahlberg G 1940 Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, New York
21. Day S J, Graham D F 1989 Sample size and power for comparing two or more treatment groups in clinical trials. British Medical Journal 299: 663-665
22. Forsberg C M, Odenrick L 1981 Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 3: 247-253
23. Freiman J A, Chalmers T C, Smith H, Kuebler R R 1978 The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. New England Journal of Medicine 299: 690-694
24. Harvold E P, Vargervik K 1971 Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 478-490
25. Haynes S 1986 Profile changes in modified functional regulator therapy. Angle Orthodontist 56: 309-314
26. Haynes S 1991 Trends in the number of active and discontinued orthodontic treatments in the General Dental Service 1964-1986/87. British Journal of Orthodontics 18: 9-14
27. Hillesund E, Fjeld D, Zachrisson B U 1978 Reliability of soft-tissue profile in cephalometrics. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 537-550
28. Holdaway R A 1983 A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. American Journal of Orthodontics 84: 1-28
29. Hunt N P, Ellisdon P S 1985 The Bionator: its use and 'abuse'. Part 2. Problems and progress. Dental Update 12: 129-132
30. Illing H M, Morris D O, Lee R T 1998 A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I - the hard tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 00-00
31. Jakobsson S O 1967 Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II division 1 malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics 53: 446-457
32. Jakobsson S O, Paulin G 1990 The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II division 1 cases. A roentgeno-cephalometric study. European Journal of Orthodontics 12: 174-184
33. Janson I 1977 A cephalometric study of the efficiency of the Bionator. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society, pp. 283-298
34. Kamonji Y 1980 A morphological study on facial soft tissue in orthodontic treatment by use of activators. Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry 22: 90-100
35. Kobayashi T et al. 1990 Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology before and after orthognathic surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 18: 68-73
36. Lavelle C L, Carvalho R S 1989 An evaluation of the changes in soft-tissue profile form induced by orthodontic therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 96: 467-476
37. Looi L K, Mills J R 1986 The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile. American Journal of Orthodontics 89: 507-517
38. Malmgren O, Ömblus J 1985 Treatment with an orthopaedic appliance system. European Journal of Orthodontics 7: 205-214
39. Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H 1987 Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 91: 143-151
40. Mamandras A H, Allen L P 1990 Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 113-120
41. Mamandras A H, D'Aloisio D R, Lenizky R J 1989 Facial changes in children treated with the Activator appliance: a lateral cephalometric study. Canadian Dental Association Journal 55: 727-730
42. McCance A M, Moss J P, Wright W R, Linney A D, James D R 1992 A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of 16 skeletal Class III patients following bimaxillary surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 30: 221-232
43. McCance A M, Moss J P, Wright W R, Linney A D, James D R 1997 Three-dimensional analysis techniques - Part 2. Laser scanning: a quantitative three-dimensional soft-tissue analysis using a color-coding system. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 46-51
44. McNamara J A Jr, Bookstein F L, Shaughnessy T G 1985 Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 91-110
45. Midtgård J, Björk G, Linder-Aronson S 1974 Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthodontist 44: 56-61
46. Moss J P, Linney A D, Grindrod S R, Mosse C A 1989 A laser scanning system for the measurement of facial surface morphology. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 10: 179-190
47. Moss J P, Campos J C, Linney A D 1992 The analysis of profiles using curvature analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 457-461
48. Norusis M J 1986 SPSS PC+. SPSS Inc., Chicago
49. Ömblus J, Malmgren O, Hägg U 1997 Mandibular growth during initial treatment with the Bass orthopaedic appliance in relation to age and growth periods. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 47-56
50. Op Heij D G, Callaert H, Opdebeeck H M 1989 The effect of the amount of protrusion built into the bionator on condylar growth and displacement: a clinical study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 95: 401-409
51. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, Ömblus J, Hansen K 1989 Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. European Journal of Orthodontics 11: 17-30
52. Remmer K R, Mamandras A H, Hunter W S, Way D C 1985 Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance and the fixed appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 363-372
53. Righellis E G 1983 Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthodontist 53: 107-121
54. Subtelny A D 1959 A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. American Journal of Orthodontics 45: 481-507
55. Talass M F, Talass L, Baker R C 1987 Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 91: 385-394
56. Tanner J M 1962 Growth at adolescence, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
57. Trenouth M J 1992 A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Functional Orthodontist 9: 26-31
58. Tulloch J F C, Medland W, Tuncay O C 1990 Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 340-347
59. Vargervik K, Harvold E P 1985 Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 242-251
60. Webster T, Harkness M, Herbison P 1996 Associations between changes in selected facial dimensions and the outcome of orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 46-53
61. Weinbach J R, Smith R J 1992 Cephalometric changes during treatment with the open bite bionator. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 101: 367-374
62. Whitney E F, Sinclair P M 1987 An evaluation of combination second molar extraction and functional appliance therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 91: 183-192
63. Wisth P J 1974 Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction in boys. British Journal of Orthodontics 1: 199-204