Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 159-170

  Baccetti, Tiziano ^b   Franchi, Lorenzo ^c   Toth, Linda Ratner ^a   McNamara Jr , James A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CERVICAL SPINE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; CEPHALOMETRY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0034243897     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.105571     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Balters W. Die Technik und Übung der allgemeinen und speziellen Bionator-therapie. Quintessenz 1964;1:77.
2. Janson I. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in patients treated with a bionator during prepubertal and pubertal growth. In: McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, Howe RP, eds. Clinical alteration of the growing face. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1983: Craniofacial Growth Monograph Series; vol 14.
3. Johnston LE, Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments. In: Vig PS, Ribbens KA, eds. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1986: Craniofacial Growth Series; vol 19.
4. Fränkel R. The theoretical concept underlying the treatment with functional correctors. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1966;42:233-54.
5. Fränkel R. The treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctors. Am J Orthod 1969;55:265-75.
6. Fränkel R, Fränkel C. Orofacial orthopedics with the function regulator. Munich: S. Karger, 1989.
7. McNamara JA, Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985;88:91-110.
8. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979;76:423-42.
9. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance: its biological effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.
10. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1-13.
11. McNamara JA, Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.
12. Lai M, McNamara JA, Jr. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod 1998;4:46-58.
13. Jasper JJ, McNamara JA, Jr. The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:641-50.
14. Clark WJ. The Twin-block traction technique. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:129-38.
15. Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique: a functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:1-18.
16. Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique. Part 1. Funct Orthod 1992;9:32-4,36-7.
17. Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique. Part 2. Funct Orthod 1992;9:45-9.
18. Clark WJ. Twin-block functional therapy. London: Mosby-Wolfe, 1995.
19. Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, eds. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1997:268-98.
20. Nanda RS. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms. Am J Orthod 1955;41:658-73.
21. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963;42:400-11.
22. Hunter C. The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod 1966;36:44-54.
23. Ekström C. Facial growth rate and its relation to somatic maturation in healthy children. Swed Dent J (Suppl) 1982;11:1-99.
24. Lewis A, Roche AF, Wagner B. Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible: comparisons within individuals. Angle Orthod 1985;55:17-30.
25. Hägg U, Pancherz H, Taranger J. Pubertal growth and orthodontic treatment. In: Carlson DS, Ribbens KA, eds. Craniofacial growth during adolescence. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1987: Craniofacial Growth Monograph Series; vol 20.
26. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J, Shaye R. Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a functional appliance? Inter J Orthod 1991;29:3-8.
27. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J. Mechanism of craniofacial growth and modus operandi of functional appliances: a cell-level and cybernetic approach to orthodontic decision making. In: Carlson DS, ed. Craniofacial growth theory and orthodontic treatment. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1990: Craniofacial Growth Monograph Series; vol 23.
28. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J. Biologische Grundlage für die unterschiedliche interindividuelle Gewebereaktion auf eine Kieferorthopädische Behandlung mit dem Bionator. In: Harzer W, ed. Kieferorthopädischer Gewebeumbau. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH; 1991. p. 49-62.
29. Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:143-51.
30. Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development: an analysis of 72 male patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:169-76.
31. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1959.
32. Hellman M. The process of dentition and its effects on occlusion. Dent Cosmos 1923;65:1329-44.
33. Lewis AB, Garn SM. The relationship between tooth formation and other maturation factors. Angle Orthod 1960;30:70-7.
34. Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1962.
35. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae [dissertation]. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh; 1972.
36. O'Reilly M, Yanniello GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae - a longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod 1988;58:179-84.
37. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA, Jr. Treatment and post-treatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999:115;429-38.
38. Lund DL, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin-blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:104-10.
39. Mills C, McCulloch K. Treatment effects of the Twin-block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod 1998;114:15-24.
40. Toth LR, McNamara JA, Jr. Skeletal and dentoalveolar adaptations produced by Twin-block appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:597-609.
41. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Jr, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study, The University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: The Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1974. Craniofacial Growth Monograph Series; vol 2.
42. Barrer HG. Protecting the integrity of mandibular incisor position through keystoning procedure and spring retainer appliance. J Clin Orthod 1975;9:486-94.
43. Halazonetis DJ. Computer-assisted cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:517-21.
44. Hassel B, Farman A. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:58-66.
45. Lavergne J, Gasson N. Operational definitions of mandibular morphogenetic and positional rotations. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:185-92.
46. McNamara JA, Jr. Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations to altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod 1973;64:578-606.
47. McNamara JA, Jr, Carlson DS. Quantitative analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptations to protrusive function. Am J Orthod 1979;76:593-611.
48. McNamara JA, Jr, Hinton RJ, Hoffman DL. Histological analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptation to protrusive function in young adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca Mulatta). Am J Orthod 1982;82:288-98.
49. McNamara JA, Jr, Bryan FA. Long-term mandibular adaptations to protrusive function: an experimental study in Macaca Mulatta. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:98-108.
50. Petrovic AG, Stutzmann JJ. Research methodology and findings in applied craniofacial growth studies. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, eds. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances, 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1997. p. 13-63.
51. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:375-88.
52. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:657-68.
53. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodelling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:181-98.
54. Hinton RJ, McNamara JA, Jr. Temporal bone adaptations in response to protrusive function in juvenile and young adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Eur J Orthod 1984;6:155-74.
55. Windmiller EC. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104:73-84.
56. Graber TM. Foreword. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:1-4.
57. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation: an analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1985;88:273-87.
58. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:220-33.
59. Pancherz H. The modern Herbst appliance. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, eds. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances, 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1997. p.336-66.
60. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:285-95.
61. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and postdentofacial orthopedics: a long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:209-18.