Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study

Progress in Orthodontics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-7

  Chavan, Santosh J ^a   Bhad, Wasundhara A ^a   Doshi, Umal H ^b,c  

^a GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL   (India)

^b Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital   (India)

^c Builders Society   (India)

Author keywords

Bionator; Magnetic resonance imaging; Temporomandibular joint; Twin Block

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; RETROGNATHIA; SCHOOL CHILD; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADAPTATION; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; ORTHODONTIC PROCEDURE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TEMPORAL BONE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISC; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL OCCLUSION, CENTRIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; RETROGNATHIA; TEMPORAL BONE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISC;

EID: 84952994323     PISSN: 17237785     EISSN: 21961042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0057-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Clark WJ. Twin Block Functional Therapy: Applications in Dentofacial Orthopedics. London: Mosby; 1995.
2. Kaur H, Pavithra US, Abraham R. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in South Indian population.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2013; 3(2):97–102.
3. McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor: Needham Press; 2001: p. 67–80.
4. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co.; 1985.
5. Ghafari J, King GJ, Tulloch JF. Early treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion—comparison of alternative treatment modalities.Clin Orthod Res. 1998; 1:107–17.
6. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RTA. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I—the hard tissues.Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20:501–16.
7. O'Brien K, Wright JL, Conboy FM, Sanjie Y, Mandall NA, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:234–43.
8. Araujo AM, Buschang PH, Melo AC. Adaptive condylar growth and mandibular remodelling changes with bionator therapy - an implant study.Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26:515–22.
9. Foucart JM, Pajoni D, Carpentier P, Pharaboz C. Temporomandibular joint: MR investigation of the effects of functional appliance in the treatment of class II malocclusions (IADR Abstracts).J Dent Res. 1998; 77:882.
10. Ruf S, Pancerz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 115:607–18.
11. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Thomalske-Faubert C. Mandibular articular disk position changes during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal MRI study.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 116:207–14.
12. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Does bite jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients.Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:183–99.
13. Chintakanon K, Sampson W, Wilkinson T, Townsend G. A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000; 118:494–504.
14. Arat ZM, Gokalp H, Erdem D, Erden I. Changes in the TMJ disk-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001; 119:316–9.
15. Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, Petersson A. Relationship of mandibular condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987; 91:200–6.
16. Vargas-Pereira MR. Quantitative Auswertung bildgebender Verfahren und Entwicklung einer neuren metrischen Analyse for Kiefergelenkstrukturen in Magnetresonanztomogramm [thesis Dr Med Dent]. University of Kiel, Kiel (Germany); 1997.
17. Drace JE, Enzmann DR. Defining the normal TMJ: closed-, partially open- and open-mouth MR imaging of asymptomatic subjects.Radiology. 1990; 177:67–71.
18. Silverstein R, Dunn S, Binder R, Maganzini A. MRI assessment of the normal temporomandibular joint with the use of projective geometry.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994; 77:523–30.
19. Franco AA, Yamashita HK, Lederman HM, Cevidanes LHS, Proffit WR, Vigorito JW. Fränkel appliance therapy and the temporomandibular disc: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121:447–57.
20. Ruf S, Wusten B, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint effects of activator treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical study.Angle Orthod. 2002; 72:527–40.
21. Arieta-Miranda JM, Silva-Valencia M, Flores-Mir C, Paredes-Sampen NA, Arriola-Guillen LE. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.Prog Orthod. 2013; 14:36. doi:10.1186/2196-1042-14-36.
22. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in class II malocclusions.Am J Orthod. 1985; 88:242–51.
23. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment: a clinical and MRI study.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 114:475–83.