Study on interference suppression algorithms for electronic noses: A review

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2018, Pages

  Liang, Zhifang ^a   Tian, Fengchun ^b   Yang, Simon X ^c   Zhang, Ci ^b   Sun, Hao ^b   Liu, Tao ^b  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electronic nose; Interference; Suppression

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; GAS DETECTORS; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; WAVE INTERFERENCE;

DEGREE OF SPECIFICITY; ELECTRONIC NOSE (E-NOSE); INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION ALGORITHMS; NON-LINEAR METHODS; OPERATING CONDITION; SUPPRESSION; SUPPRESSION METHOD; TRANSFER LEARNING;

ELECTRONIC NOSE;

EID: 85045392005     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s18041179     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Hassan, M.; Bermak, A. Biologically Inspired Feature Rank Codes for Hardware Friendly Gas Identification with the Array of Gas Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 5776–5784. [CrossRef]
2. Jing, Y.Q.; Meng, Q.H.; Qi, P.F.; Cao, M.L.; Ming, Z.; Ma, S.G. A Bioinspired Neural Network or Data Processing in an Electronic Nose. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2016, 65, 2369–2380. [CrossRef]
3. Zhang, L.; Tian, F.; Pei, G. A novel sensor selection using pattern recognition in electronic nose. Measurement 2014, 54, 31–39.[CrossRef]
4. Loutfi, A.; Coradeschi, S.; Mani, G.K.; Shankarb, P.; Rayappan, J.B.B. Electronic noses for food quality: A review. J. Food Eng. 2015, 144, 103–111.[CrossRef]
5. Chilo, J.; Pelegri-Sebastia, J.; Cupane, M.; Sogorb, T. E-nose application to food industry production. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 2016, 19, 27–33.[CrossRef]
6. Vincentis, A.D.; Pennazza, G.; Santonico, M.; Vespasiani-Gentilucci, U. Galati, G.; Gallo, P.; Vernile, C.; Pedone, C.; Incalzi, R.A.; Picardi, A. Breath-print analysis by e-nose for classifying and monitoring chronic liver disease: A proof-of-concept study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25337.[CrossRef][PubMed]
7. Schnabel, R.M.; Boumans, M.L.; Smolinska, A.; Stobberingh, E.E.; Kaufmann, R.; Roekaerts, P.M.H.J.; Bergmans, D.C.J.J. Electronic nose analysis of exhaled breath to diagnose ventilator associated pneumonia. Respir. Med. 2015, 109, 1454–1459.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Pang, L.; Wang, J.; Lu, X.; Yu, H. Discrimination of storage age for wheat by E-Nose. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51, 1707–1712. [CrossRef]
9. Ghosh, A.; Ray, H.; Ghosh, T.K.; Das, A.; Bhattacharyya, N. Generic handheld E-Nose platform for quality Assessment of agricultural produces and biomedical applications. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 40, 259–264.
10. Herrero, J.L.; Lozano, J.; Santos, J.P.; Fernández, J.Á.; Marcelo, J.I.S. A web-based approach for classifying environmental pollutants using portable E-nose devices. Intell. Syst. IEEE 2016, 31, 108–112. [CrossRef]
11. Dentoni, L.; Capelli, L.; Sironi, S.; del Rosso, R.; Zanetti, S.; della Torre, M. Development of an electronic nose for environmental odour monitoring. Sensors 2012, 12, 14363–14381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Hossein-Babaei, F.; Amini, A. Recognition of complex odors with a single generic tin oxide gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 194, 156–163. [CrossRef]
13. Strothman, J. NASA e-nose sniffs out harmful gases. InTech 2002, 49, 33–34.
14. Chen, Q.; Liu, A.; Zhao, J.; Ouyang, Q. Classification of tea category using a portable electronic nose based on an odor imaging sensor array. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 84, 77–83.[CrossRef][PubMed]
15. Scott, S.M.; James, D.; Ali, Z. Data analysis for electronic nose systems. Microchim. Acta 2006, 156, 183–207.[CrossRef]
16. Barsan, N.; Koziej, D.;Weimar, U. Metal oxide-based gas sensor research: How to? Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 121, 18–35. [CrossRef]
17. Pijolat, C.; Riviere, B.; Kamionka, M.; Viricelle, J.P.; Breuil, P. Tin dioxide gas sensor as a tool for atmospheric pollution monitoring: Problems and possibilities for improvements. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 4333–4346. [CrossRef]
18. Romain, A.C.; Nicolas, J. Monitoring an odour in the environment with an electronic nose: Requirements for the signal processing. Biol. Inspir. Signal Process. Chem. Sens. 2009, 188, 121–134.
19. General Information for TGS Sensors, Figaro Group. Available online: http://www.figaro.co.jp/ (accessed on 7 April 2018).
20. Mumyakmaz, B.; Özmen, A.; Ebeoglu, M.A.; Tasaltın, C.; Gürol, I. A study on the development of a compensation method for humidity effect in QCM sensor responses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 147, 277–282. [CrossRef]
21. Kashwan, K.R.; Bhuyan, M. Robust electronic-nose system with temperature and humidity drift compensation for tea and spice flavour discrimination. In Proceedings of the 2005 Asian Conference on Sensors and the International Conference on New Techniques in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–7 September 2005. [CrossRef]
22. Nenova, Z.; Dimchev, G. Compensation of the impact of disturbing factors on gas sensor characteristics. Acta Polytech. Hung. 2013, 10, 97–111.
23. Tian, X.L.; Yin, Y.; Liu, H.J. Research on Artificial Olfactory Sensor Technology for Liquor Identification. Food Sci. 2004, 25, 29–32.
24. Gardner, J.W.; Hines, E.L.; Molinier, F.; Bartlett, P.N.; Mottram, T.T. Prediction of health of dairy cattle from breath samples using neural network with parametric model of dynamic response of array of semiconducting ga sensors, Science, Measurement and Technology. IEE Proc. 1999, 146, 102–106.[CrossRef]
25. Xu, X.; Qiu, J.; Chen, C. A study on local sensor fusion of wireless sensor networks based on the neural network. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2008, 7, 4045–4050.
26. Shi, J.F.; Tang, H.B.; Gong, H.Y. Application of wavelet neural network and multi-sensor data fusion technique in intelligent sensor. World Congr. Intell. Control Autom. 2008, 29, 1114–1117.
27. Natale, C.D.; Martinelli, E.; D’Amico, A. Counteraction of environmental disturbances of electronic nose data by independent component analysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2002, 82, 158–165.[CrossRef]
28. Tian, F.; Zhang, J.; Yang, S.X.; Zhao, Z.; Liang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D. Suppression of strong background interference on E-Nose sensors in an open country environment. Sensors 2016, 16, 233.[CrossRef][PubMed]
29. 2 sensitivity. In Proceedings of the Microsystems and Nanoelectronics Research Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 13–14 October 2009; pp. 112–115.
30. Feng, J.; Tian, F.; Yan, J.; He, Q.; Shen, Y.; Pan, L. A background elimination method based on wavelet transform in wound infection detection by electronic nose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 395–400.[CrossRef]
31. Tian, F.; Yan, J.; Xu, S.; Feng, J.; He, Q.; Shen, Y.; Jia, P. Background Interference Elimination in Wound Infection Detection by Electronic Nose Based on Reference Vector-based Independent Component Analysis. Inf. Technol. J. 2012, 11, 850–858.[CrossRef]
32. Wold, S.; Antti, H.; Lindgren, F.; Öhman, J. Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44, 175–185.[CrossRef]
33. Talebpour, Z.; Tavallaie, R.; Ahmadi, S.H.; Abdollahpour, A. Simultaneous determination of penicillin G salts by infrared spectroscopy: Evaluation of combining orthogonal signal correction with radial basis function-partial least squares regression. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2010, 76, 452–457.[CrossRef][PubMed]
34. Laghi, L.; Versari, A.; Parpinello, G.P.; Nakaji, D.Y.; Boulton, R.B. FTIR Spectroscopy and Direct Orthogonal Signal Correction Preprocessing Applied to Selected Phenolic Compounds in Red Wines. Food Anal. Methods 2011, 4, 619–625.
35. [CrossRef]
36. Feng, J.; Tian, F.; Jia, P.; He, Q.; Shen, Y.; Fan, S. Improving the performance of electronic nose for wound infection detection using orthogonal signal correction and particle swarm optimization. Sens. Rev. 2014, 34, 389–395. [CrossRef]
37. Tian, F.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Ye, Q.; Hu, B.; Xiao, B. A Denoising Method based on PCA and ICA in Electronic Nose for Gases Quantification. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2012, 8, 5005–5015.
38. Gutierrez-Osuna, R.; Raman, B. Cancellation of chemical backgrounds with generalized Fisher's linear discriminants. Sensors 2004, 3, 1381–1384.
39. Gutierrez-Osuna, R.; Gutierrez-Galvez, A. Habituation in the KIII olfactory model with chemical sensor arrays. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2003, 14, 1565–1568. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Gutierrez-Galvez, A.; Gutierrez-Osuna, R. Contrast enhancement and background suppression of chemosensor array patterns with the KIII model. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2006, 21, 937–953. [CrossRef]
41. Zhang, L.; Tian, F.; Dang, L.; Li, G.; Peng, X.; Yin, X.; Liu, S. A novel background interferences elimination method in electronic nose using pattern recognition. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2013, 201, 254–263. [CrossRef]
42. Tian, F.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z. A novel pattern mismatch based interference elimination technique in E-nose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 234, 703–712.[CrossRef]
43. Balaban, M.O.; Korel, F.; Odabasi, A.Z.; Folkes, G. Transportability of data between electronic noses: Mathematical methods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 71, 203–211. [CrossRef]
44. Shaham, O.; Carmel, L.; Harel, D. On mappings between electronic noses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 106, 76–82. [CrossRef]
45. Tomic, O.; Ulmer, H.; Haugen, J.E. Standardization methods for handling instrument related signal shift in gas-sensor array measurement data. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 472, 99–111. [CrossRef]
46. Zhang, L.; Tian, F.; Kadri, C.; Xiao, B.; Li, H.; Pan, L.; Zhou, H. On-line sensor calibration transfer among electronic nose instruments for monitoring volatile organic chemicals in indoor air quality. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 160, 899–909. [CrossRef]
47. Deshmukh, S.; Kamde, K.; Jana, A.; Korde, S.; Bandyopadhyay, R.; Sankar, R.; Bhattacharyya, N.; Pandey, R.A. Calibration transfer between electronic nose systems for rapid in situ measurement of pulp and paper industry emissions. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 841, 58–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Yan, K.; Zhang, D. Improving the transfer ability of prediction models for electronic noses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 220, 115–124.[CrossRef]
49. Yan, K.; Zhang, D. Calibration transfer and drift compensation of e-noses via coupled task learning. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 225, 288–297. [CrossRef]
50. Marco, S.; Gutierrez-Galvez, A. Signal and Data Processing for Machine Olfaction and Chemical Sensing: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 3189–3214.[CrossRef]
51. Romain, A.C.; Nicolas, J. Long Term Stability Of Metal Oxide-Based Gas Sensors for E-nose Environmental Applications: An overview. Olfaction Electr. Nose 2010, 1137, 443–445.[CrossRef]
52. Korotcenkov, G.; Cho, B.K. Instability of metal oxide-based conductometric gas sensors and approaches to stability improvement (short survey). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156, 527–538.[CrossRef]
53. Di Carlo, S.; Falasconi, M. Drift Correction Methods for Gas Chemical Sensors in Artificial Olfaction Systems: Techniques and Challenges. Adv. Chem. Sens. 2012, 305–326.[CrossRef]
54. Artursson, T.; Eklöv, T.; Lundström, I.; Mårtensson, P.; Sjöström, M.; Holmberg, M. Drift correction for gas sensors using multivariate methods. J. Chemometr. 2000, 14, 711–723. [CrossRef]
55. Padilla, M.; Perera, A.; Montoliu, I.; Chaudry, A.; Persaud, K.; Marco, S. Drift compensation of gas sensor array data by Orthogonal Signal Correction. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010, 100, 28–35.[CrossRef]
56. Romain, A.; Nicolas, J. Long term stability of metal oxide-based gas sensors for e-nose environmental applications: An overview. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 146, 502–506. [CrossRef]
57. Zhang, L.; Tian, F.; Liu, S.; Dang, L.; Peng, X.; Yin, X. Chaotic time series prediction of E-nose sensor drift in embedded phase space. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 182, 71–79.[CrossRef]
58. Zhang, L.; Peng, X. Time series estimation of gas sensor baseline drift using ARMA and Kalman based models. Sens. Rev. 2016, 36, 34–39. [CrossRef]
59. Holmberg, M.; Davide, F.A.M.; Natale, C.D.; D'amico, A.;Winquist, F.; IngemarLundströ. Drift counteraction in odour recognition applications: Lifelong calibration method. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1997, 42, 185–194.[CrossRef]
60. Marco, S.; Pardo, A.; Ortega, A.; Samitier, J. Gas identification with tin oxide sensor array and self organizing maps: Adaptive correction of sensor drifts. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1997, 904–907. [CrossRef]
61. Zuppa, M.; Distante, C.; Siciliano, P.; Persaud, K.C. Drift counteraction with multiple self-organising maps for an electronic nose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 98, 305–317. [CrossRef]
62. De Vito, S.; Fattoruso, G.; Pardo, M.; Tortorella, F.; di Francia, G. Semi-Supervised Learning Techniques in Artificial Olfaction: A Novel Approach to Classification Problems and Drift Counteraction. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 3215–3224. [CrossRef]
63. Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Ye, M.; Ge, S.S.; Du, X. Drift Compensation for Electronic Nose by Semi-Supervised Domain Adaption. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 657–665. [CrossRef]
64. Zhang, L.; Zhang, D. Domain Adaptation Extreme Learning Machines for Drift Compensation in E-nose Systems. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2015, 64, 1790–1801. [CrossRef]
65. Yan, K.; Zhang, D. Correcting Instrumental Variation and Time-Varying Drift: A Transfer Learning Approach with Autoencoders. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2016, 65, 2012–2022. [CrossRef]
66. Al-Maskari, S.; Li, X.; Liu, Q. An Effective Approach to Handling Noise and Drift in Electronic Noses. Databases Theory Appl. 2014, 8506, 223–230.
67. Vergara, A.; Vembu, S.; Ayhan, T.; Ryan, M.A.; Homer, M.L.; Huerta, R. Chemical gas sensor drift compensation using classifier ensembles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 166–167, 320–329. [CrossRef]
68. Galloway, C.M.; Ru, E.C.L.; Etchegoin, P.G. An iterative algorithm for background removal in spectroscopy by wavelet transforms. Appl. Spectrosc. 2009, 63, 1370–1376. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. Gan, F.; Ruan, G.; Mo, J. Baseline correction by improved iterative polynomial fitting with automatic threshold. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 82, 59–65. [CrossRef]
70. Zhang, Z.M.; Chen, S.; Liang, Y.Z. Baseline correction using adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares. Analyst 2010, 135, 1138–1146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71. Tian, F.; Yang, S.X.; Dong, K. Circuit and Noise Analysis of Odorant Gas Sensors in an E-Nose. Sensors 2005, 5, 85–96. [CrossRef]
72. Park, S.J.; Kwon, O.S.; Lee, J.E.; Jang, J.; Yoon, H. Conducting polymer-based nanohybrid transducers: A potential route to high sensitivity and selectivity sensors. Sensors 2014, 14, 3604–3630. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Palanisamy, S.; Karuppiah, C.; Chen, S.M.; Periakaruppan, P. Highly sensitive and selective amperometric nitrite sensor based on electrochemically activated graphite modified screen printed carbon electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 727, 34–38. [CrossRef]
74. Abdelhalim, A.; Winkler, M.; Loghin, F.; Zeiser, C.; Lugli, P.; Abdellah, A. Highly sensitive and selective carbon nanotube-based gas sensor arrays functionalized with different metallic nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 220, 1288–1296. [CrossRef]
75. Er, E.; Çelikkan, H.; Erk, N. Highly sensitive and selective electrochemical sensor based on high-quality graphene/nafion nanocomposite for voltammetric determination of nebivolol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 170–177. [CrossRef]
76. Lupan, O.; Chow, L.; Pauporté, T.; Ono, L.K.; Cuenya, B.R.; Chai, G. Highly sensitive and selective hydrogen single-nanowire nanosensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 173, 772–780. [CrossRef]
77. Lauque, P.; Bendahan, M.; Seguin, J.L.; Ngo, K.A.; Knauth, P. Highly sensitive and selective room temperature NH3 gas microsensor using an ionic conductor (CuBr) film. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 515, 279–284. [CrossRef]
78. Park, J.Y.; Song, S.J.; Wachsman, E.D. Highly Sensitive/Selective Miniature Potentiometric Carbon Monoxide Gas Sensors with Titania-Based Sensing Elements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 1062–1068. [CrossRef]
79. Liu, J.; Qin, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, E. Highly sensitive and selective detection of cancer cell with a label-free electrochemical cytosensor. Biosens. Bioelectr. 2013, 41, 436–441. [CrossRef][PubMed]]