The perceived organizational impact of the gender gap across a Canadian department of medicine and proposed strategies to combat it: A qualitative study

BMC Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Pattani, Reena ^a,b   Marquez, Christine ^c   Dinyarian, Camellia ^c   Sharma, Malika ^b,d,e   Bain, Julie ^c   Moore, Julia E ^c   Straus, Sharon E ^a,b,c,f  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d Maple Leaf Medical   (Canada)

^e Casey House Hospice   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Academic medicine; Equity; Gender gap; Healthcare human resources; Organizational effectiveness; Workplace culture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANADA; CONSENSUS; FEMALE; GENDER; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTERVIEW; LETTER; MALE; MEDICINE; MENTOR; MONITORING; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL EXCLUSION; STEREOTYPY; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE; GENDER IDENTITY; MEDICAL SCHOOL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CANADA; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85045190123     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1032-8     Document Type: Letter

References (59)

1. Cabot R. Women in medicine. 1915. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1076.
2. Metaxa V. Is this (still) a man's world? Crit Care. 2013;17(1):112.
3. The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathways to leadership 2015-16. https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
4. Wehner M, Nead K, Linos K, Linos E. Plenty of moustaches but not enough women: cross sectional study of medical leaders. BMJ. 2015;351:h6311. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6311.
5. Filardo G, daGraca B, Sass D, Pollock B, Smith E, Martinez M. Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014). BMJ. 2016;352:i847.
6. Boiko J, Anderson A, Gordon R. Representation of women among academic grand rounds speakers. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):722-4.
7. Mehta S, Burns K, Machado F, Fox-Robichaud A, Cook D, Calfee C, Ware L, Burnham E, Kissoon N, Marshall J, et al. Gender parity in critical care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(4):425-9.
8. Lariviere V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto C. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature. 2013;504(7479):211-213.
9. Bhan A. Gender gap in medical education leadership in India. education leadership in India. BMJ Opinion 2015. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/07/31/anant-bhan-gender-gap-in-medical-education-leadership-in-india/. Accessed 20 June 2017.
10. HHS Office of Minority Health Resource Center. Women in biomedical careers: dynamics of change, strategies for the 21st century. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 1994.
11. Kuhlmann E, Ovseiko P, Kurmeyer C, Gutierrez-Lobos K, Steinbock S, von Knorring M, Buchan A, Brommels M. Closing the gender leadership gap: a multi-centre cross-country comparison of women in management and leadership in academic health centres in the European Union. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):2.
12. Smedstad K, Cohen M. Growing number of women physicians not reflected in academic medicine. CMAJ. 1991;144(10):1313-5.
13. Pololi L, Civian J, Brennan R, Dottolo A, Krupat E. Experiencing the culture of academic medicine: gender matters, a national study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(2):201-7.
14. Pololi L, Krupat E, Civian J, Ash A, Brennan R. Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2012;87(7):859-69.
15. Carr P, Gunn C, Kaplan S, Raj A, Freund K. Inadequate progress for women in academic medicine: findings from the national faculty study. J Womens Health. 2015;24(3):190-9.
16. Jena A, Olenski A, Blumenthal D. Sex differences in physician salary in U.S. public medical schools. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1294-304.
17. Tamblyn R, McMahon M, Girard N, Drake E, Nadigel J, Gaudreau K. Health services and policy research in the first decade at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ Open. 2016;4(2):E213-21.
18. Boring A, Ottoboni K, Stark P. Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen. 2016;1-11. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1066.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1.
19. Moss-Racusin C, Dovidio J, Brescoll V, Graham M, Handelsman J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(41):16474-9.
20. Sarsons H. Gender differences in recognition for group work. 2016. https://scholar.harvard.edu/sarsons/publications/note-gender-differences-recognition-group-work. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
21. Macaluso B, Lariviere V, Sugimoto T, Sugimoto C. Is Science Built on the Shoulders of women? A study of gender differences in contributorship. Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1136-42.
22. Travis E, Doty L, Helitzer D. Sponsorship: a path to the academic medicine C-suite for women faculty? Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1414-7.
23. Patton E, Griffith K, Jones R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. Differences in mentor-mentee sponsorship in male vs female recipients of National Institutes of Health grants. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(4):580-2.
24. Levinson W, Tolle S, Lewis C. Women in academic medicine. Combining career and family. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(22):1511-7.
25. Livingston G. Opting out? About 10% of highly educated moms are staying at home. In: FACTANK: News in the numbers. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2014.
26. Bhatia K, Takeyesu J, Arbelaez C, Peak D, Nadel E. An innovative educational and mentorship program for emergency medicine women residents to enhance academic development and retention. CJEM. 2015;17(6):685-8.
27. Dannels S, McLaughlin J, Gleason K, McDade S, Richman R, Morahan P. Medical school deans' perceptions of organizational climate: useful indicators for advancement of women faculty and evaluation of a leadership program's impact. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):67-79.
28. Valantine H, Grewal D, Ku M, Moseley J, Shih M, Stenvenson D, Pizzo P. The gender gap in academic medicine: comparing results from a multifaceted intervention for Stanford faculty to peer and national cohorts. Acad Med. 2014;89(6):904-11.
29. Straus S. National results vs Department of Medicine, University of Toronto benchmarks. In: The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathways to leadership. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2016.
30. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57.
31. Promotion criteria. http://www.deptmedicine.utoronto.ca/promotion-criteria. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
32. Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry and research design. 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications; 2012.
33. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008.
34. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.
35. NVivo data analysis software. http://www.qsrinternational.com. Accessed 25 Feb 2017.
36. Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis. In: The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication Limited; 2014. p. 170-83.
37. Nivet M. A diversity 3.0 update: are we moving the needle enough? Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1591-3.
38. Bates C, Gordon L, Travis E, Chatterjee A, Chaudron L, Fivush B, Gulati M, Jagsi R, Sharma P, Gillis M, et al. Striving for gender equity in academic medicine careers: a call to action. Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1050-2.
39. Advances & insights: The NIH women in science newsletter. https://womeninscience.nih.gov/nih_programs/listserv. Accessed 21 June 2017.
40. Borges N, Grover A, Navarro A, Raque-Bogdan T, Elton C. International women physicians' perspectives on choosing an academic medicine career. Perspect Med Educ. 2013;2(3):156-61.
41. Taka F, Nomura K, Horie S, Takemoto K, Takeuchi M, Takenoshita S, Murakami A, Hiraike H, Okinaga H, Smith D. Organizational climate with gender equity and burnout among university academics in Japan. Ind Health. 2016;54(6):480-7.
42. Westring A, Speck R, Sammel M, Scott P, Tuton L, Grisso J, Abbuhl S. A culture conducive to women's academic success: development of a measure. Acad Med. 2012;87(11):1622-31.
43. Tsugawa Y, Jena A, Figueroa J, Orav E, Blumenthal D, Jha A. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206-13.
44. Komaromy M, Grumbach K, Drake M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, Keane D, Bindman A. The role of black and Hispanic physicians in providing health care for underserved populations. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(20):1305-10.
45. Marrast L, Zallman L, Woolhandler S, Bor D, McCormick D. Minority physicians' role in the care of underserved patients: diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):289-91.
46. Blomkalns A, Chen A, Hochman J, Peterson E, Trynosky K, Diercks D, Brogan G, Boden W, Roe M, Ohman E, et al. Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(6):832-7.
47. Burstein JM, Yan R, Weller I, Abramson BL. Management of congestive heart failure: a gender gap may still exist. Observations from a contemporary cohort. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2003;3:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-3-1.
48. McMurray R, Clarke O, Barrasso J, Clohan D, Epps C, Glasson J, McQuillan R, Plows C, Puzak M, Orentlicher D, et al. Gender disparities in clinical decision making. JAMA. 1991;266(4):559-62.
49. Doyal L. Sex, gender, and health: the need for a new approach. BMJ. 2001;323(7320):1061-3.
50. Schiebinger L. Women's health and clinical trials. J Clin Invest. 2003;112(7):973-7.
51. Ovseiko P, Greenhalgh T, Adam P, Grant J, Hinrichs-Krapels S, Graham K, Valentine P, Sued O, Boukhris O, Al-Olaqi N, et al. A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Heath Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):50.
52. Boyle E. The feminization of teaching in America. Kampf Prize. https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena.mit.edu/org/w/wgs/prize/eb04.html. Accessed 25 May 2017.
53. Carnes M, Devine P, Baier-Manwell L, Byars-Winston A, Fine E, Ford C, Forscher P, Isaac C, Kaatz A, Magua W, et al. The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med. 2015;90(2):221-30.
54. Girod S, Fassiotto M, Grewal D, Ku M, Sriram N, Nosek B, Valantine H. Reducing implicit gender leadership bias in academic medicine with an educational intervention. Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1143-50.
55. Dobbin F, Kalev A. Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review 2016. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
56. Paluck E, Green D. Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:339-67.
57. Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 1991;43(6):1241-300.
58. Ginther D, Kahn S, Schaffer W. Gender, race/ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 research awards: is there evidence of a double bind for women of color? Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1098-107.
59. Academic position descriptions. http://www.deptmedicine.utoronto.ca/academic-position-descriptions. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.