Mapping recreation as an ecosystem service: Considering scale, interregional differences and the influence of physical attributes

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 175, Issue , 2018, Pages 149-160

  Scholte, Samantha S K ^a   Daams, Michiel ^b   Farjon, Hans ^c   Sijtsma, Frans J ^b   van Teeffelen, Astrid J A ^a   Verburg, Peter H ^a,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^d SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Land use planning; Nature based recreation; Participatory GIS; Spatial analysis

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; LAND USE; MAPS; TOPOGRAPHY;

CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HOTSPOTS; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL SCALE; NATURE-BASED RECREATION; PARTICIPATORY GIS; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; SERVICE RESEARCHES; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

MAPPING;

CULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EXPERT SYSTEM; GIS; LAND USE PLANNING; MAPPING METHOD; NATURE CONSERVATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 85044942213     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aldstadt, J., Spatial clustering. Handbook of applied spatial analysis, 2010, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7 15 pp. 279-300.
2. Baddeley, A., Turner, R., Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 42:3 (2000), 283–322.
3. Baddeley, A., Turner, R., Spatstat: An R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of statistical software 12 (2005), 1–42.
4. Beverly, J.L., Uto, K., Wilkes, J., Bothwell, P., Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38 (2008), 289–303, 10.1139/X07-149.
5. Bijker, R.A., Sijtsma, F.J., A portfolio of natural places: Using a participatory gis tool to compare the appreciation and use of green spaces inside and outside urban areas by urban residents. Landscape and Urban Planning 158 (2017), 155–165.
6. Brown, G., Fagerholm, N., Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosys- tem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services 13 (2015), 119–133, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
7. Brown, G., Kyttä, M., Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 46 (2014), 122–136, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
8. Brown, G., Raymond, C., The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 27 (2007), 89–111, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002.
9. Brown, G., Weber, D., Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Applied Geography 34 (2012), 316–324, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007.
10. Buijs, A.E., Lay people's images of nature: Comprehensive frameworks of values, beliefs, and value orientations. Society and Natural Resources 22 (2009), 417–432.
11. Burkhard, B., Crossman, N., Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice. Ecosystem Services, 4, 2013, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.005.
12. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F., Mapping ecosystem ser- vice supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21 (2012), 17–29, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
13. Cai, L.A., Cooperative branding for rural destinations. Annals of Tourism Research 29 (2002), 720–742, 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00080-9.
14. Casado-Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M., Madariaga, I., Verburg, P.H., Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning. Landscape Ecology 29 (2014), 1393–1405, 10.1007/s10980-013-9945-2.
15. Caspersen, O.H., Olafsson, A.S., Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of the green structure in greater Copenhagen. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9 (2010), 101–112, 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.007.
16. Clawson, M., Knetsch, J.L., Economics of outdoor recreation. Vol. 3, 1966, Rout-ledge.
17. Crossman, N.D., Burkhard, B., Willemen, L., Palomo, I., Drakou, E.G., Martín-Lopez, B., et al. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4 (2013), 4–14, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001.
18. Daams, M.N., Sijtsma, F.J., van der Vlist, A.J., The effect of natural space on nearby property prices: Accounting for perceived attractiveness. Land Economics 92:3 (2016), 389–410.
19. Davis, N., Daams, M., van Hinsberg, A., Sijtsma, F., How deep is your love - of nature? a psychological and spatial analysis of the depth of feelings towards dutch nature areas. Applied Geography 77 (2016), 38–48, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.012.
20. De Valck, J., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., De Nocker, L., Van Orshoen, J., Vranken, L., Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning 151 (2016), 64–78, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.008.
21. De Vries, S., Buijs, A.E., Langers, F., Farjon, H., van Hinsberg, A., Sijtsma, F.J., Measuring the attractiveness of dutch landscapes: Identifying national hotspots of highly valued places using google maps. Applied Geography 45 (2013), 220–229.
22. De Vries, S., Hoogerwerf, M., De Regt, W.J., AVANAR: Een ruimtelijk model voor het berekenen van vraagaanbodverhoudingen voor recreatieve activiteiten; basisdocumentatie en gevoeligheidsanalyses. 2004, Rapport, Wageningen, Alterra, 1094.
23. Deng, J., King, B., Bauer, T., Evaluating natural attractions for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 29 (2002), 422–438, 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00068-8.
24. Dunn, C.E., Participatory GIS – A people's GIS?. Progress in Human Geography 31 (2007), 616–637, 10.1177/0309132507081493.
25. Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P.R., Anderson, B.J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D.B., et al. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 47 (2010), 377–385, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x.
26. Farjon, H., & van Hinsberg, A. (2015). Review landscape appreciation model (Report No. 1352). Retrieved from webpage of the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. < http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/pbl-2015-Review%20landscape%20appreciation%20model-1352.pdf>.
27. Hall, C.M., Page, S.J., The geography of tourism and recreation: Environment, place and space. 2014, Routledge.
28. Kim, S.S., Lee, C.-K., Klenosky, D.B., The infl of push and pull factors at Korean national parks. Tourism Management 24 (2003), 169–180, 10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00059-6.
29. Klenosky, D.B., The ”pull” of tourism destinations: A means-end investigation. Journal of Travel Research 40 (2002), 396–403.
30. Koppen, G., Sang, A.O., Tveit, M.S., Managing the potential for out- door recreation: Adequate mapping and measuring of accessibility to urban recreational landscapes. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13 (2014), 71–83, 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.005.
31. Lewicka, M., Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (2011), 207–230, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001.
32. Maat, K., De Vries, P., The influence of the residential environment on green- space travel: Testing the compensation hypothesis. Environment and Planning A 38 (2006), 2111–2127.
33. Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J.P., et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services 1 (2012), 31–39, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004.
34. Martínez-Harms, M.J., Balvanera, P., Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 8 (2012), 17–25, 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792.
35. McCall, M., Minang, P.A., Assessing participatory GIS for community based nature resource management: Claiming forests in Cameroon. The Geographical Journal 171 (2005), 340–356, 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00173.x.
36. Mommaas, H., Latour, B., Scruton, R., Schmid, W., Mol, A., Schouten, M., et al. Nature in modern society now and in the future (Tech. Rep.). 2017, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
37. Nahuelhal, L., Carmona, A., Lozada, P., Jaramillo, A., Aguyao, M., Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem services: An application at the local level of Southern Chile. Applied Geography 40 (2013), 71–82, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004.
38. Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J.P., Termansen, M., et al. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecological Indicators 45 (2014), 371–385, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018.
39. Penã, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M., Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosystem Services 13 (2015), 108–118, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008.
40. Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., Bieling, C., Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33 (2013), 118–129, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.
41. Prebensen, N.K., Exploring tourists'images of a distant destination. Tourism Management 28 (2007), 747–756, 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.005.
42. Ramirez-Gomez, S.O.I., Brown, G., Verweij, P.A., Boot, R., Participatory mapping to identify indigenous community use zones: Implications for conservation planning in southern Suriname. Journal for Nature Conservation 29 (2016), 69–78, 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.11.004.
43. Remme, R.P., Schröter, M., Hein, L., Developing spatial biophysical account-ing for multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 10 (2014), 6–18, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.006.
44. Scannell, L., Gifford, R., Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30:1 (2010), 1–10, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
45. Schägner, J.P., Brander, L., Maes, J., Hartje, V., Mapping ecosystem services’ values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services 4 (2013), 33–46, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003.
46. Schägner, J.P., Brander, L., Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Hartje, V., Mapping recreational visits and values of European National Parks by combining statistical modelling and unit value transfer. Journal for Nature Conservation 31 (2016), 71–84, 10.1016/j.jnc.2016.03.001.
47. Schröter, M., Barton, D.N., Remme, R.P., Hein, L., Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for telemark, norway. Ecological Indicators 36 (2014), 539–551, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018.
48. Sijtsma, F.J., de Vries, S., van Hinsberg, A., Diederiks, J., Does ”grey” urban living lead to more ”green” holiday nights? a Netherlands case study. Landscape and Urban Planning 105 (2012), 250–257.
49. Sijtsma, F. J., van der Bilt, W. G., van Hinsberg, A. de Knegt, B., van der Heide, C. M., Leneman, H. Verburg, R. (2017). Planning nature in urbanized countries. An analysis of monetary and non-monetary impacts of conservation policy scenarios in the Netherlands. Heliyon, 3, e00280, pp. 1–30.
50. Sijtsma, F.J., Farjon, H., van Tol, S., van Kampen, P., Buijs, A., van Hinsberg, A., Evaluation of landscape impacts: Enriching the economist's toolbox with the HotSpotIndex. The Economic Value of Landscapes 26 (2012), 126–136.
51. van Riper, C.J., Kyle, G.T., Sutton, S.G., Barnes, M., Sherrouse, B.C., Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchbrook Island National Park, Australia. Applied Geography 35 (2012), 164–173, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008.
52. Weyland, F., Laterra, P., Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: A method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 39 (2014), 34–43, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.023.