Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 151, Issue , 2016, Pages 64-78

  De Valck, Jeremy ^a,b   Broekx, Steven ^b   Liekens, Inge ^b   De Nocker, Leo ^b   Van Orshoven, Jos ^a   Vranken, Liesbet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Hot spot analysis; Nature valuation; Outdoor recreation; Public participation GIS; Substitute

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MAPPING; POPULATION STATISTICS;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HOT SPOT; OUTDOOR RECREATION; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SUBSTITUTE;

ECOSYSTEMS;

COLLECTIVE ACTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GIS; MAPPING METHOD; OUTDOOR RECREATION; PUBLIC SPACE; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN PLANNING; WALKING;

ANTWERP [BELGIUM]; BELGIUM;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 84962197739     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abildtrup J., Olsen S.B., Stenger A. Combining RP and SP data while accounting for large choice sets and travel mode-an application to forest recreation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 2014, 10.1080/21606544.2014.986210.
2. Adamowicz W., Swait J., Boxall P., Louviere J., Williams M. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1997, 32:65-84.
3. Alessa L., Kliskey A., Brown G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:27-39.
4. Anderson T.K. Kernel density estimation and K-means clustering to profile road accident hotspots. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41(3):359-364.
5. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27(2):93-115.
6. Barrell J., Grant J. Detecting hot and cold spots in a seagrass landscape using local indicators of spatial association. Landscape Ecology 2013, 28(10):2005-2018.
7. Bateman I., Brouwer R., Ferrini S., Schaafsma M., Barton D., Dubgaard A., et al. Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 50:365-387.
8. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Georgiou S., Lake I. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics 2006, 60(2):450-460.
9. Belgian Federal Government Structuur van de bevolking volgens woonplaats: oppervlakte en bevolkingsdichtheid (Structure of the population by residence). [online] 2013, http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/statistieken/cijfers/bevolking/structuur/woonplaats/oppervlakte_dichtheid.
10. Belgian Federal Government Statistique fiscale des revenus (Income fiscal statistics) [online] 2013, http://statbel.fgov.be/fr/modules/publications/statistiques/marche_du_travail_et_conditions_de_vie/Statistique_fiscale_des_revenus.jsp.
11. Beverly J.L., Uto K., Wilkes J., Bothwell P. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2008, 38(2):289-303.
12. Bliem M., Getzner M., Rodiga-Laßnig P. Temporal stability of individual preferences for river restoration in Austria using a choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management 2012, 103:65-73.
13. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L., Swait J., Williams M., Louviere J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:243-253.
14. Brown G., Fagerholm N. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services 2014, 13:119-133. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
15. Brown G., Weber D. Public Participation GIS: a new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 102(1):1-15.
16. Brown G., Weber D., de Bie K. Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Applied Geography 2014, 53:77-89.
17. Cadwallader M. Towards a cognitive gravity model: the case of consumer spatial behavior. Regional Studies 1981, 15(4):275-284.
18. Campbell D., Hutchinson W.G., Scarpa R. Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(1):97-111.
19. Campbell D., Scarpa R., Hutchinson W.G. Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 2008, 1(2-3):117-126.
20. Chaikaew N., Tripathi N.K., Souris M. Exploring spatial patterns and hotspots of diarrhea in Chiang Mai, Thailand. International Journal of Health Geographics 2009, 8:36. 10.1186/1476-072X-8-36.
21. Cummings R.G., Ganderton P.T., McGuckin T. Substitution effects in CVM values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1994, 76(2):205-214.
22. De Valck J., Vlaeminck P., Broekx S., Liekens I., Aertsens J., Chen W., Vranken L. Benefits of clearing existing forests to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 2014, 125:65-75.
23. De Valck J., Broekx S., Liekens I., Aertsens J., Vranken L. Testing the influence of substitutes in nature valuation by using spatial discounting factors. Environmental and Resource Economics 2015, 0640-015. 10.1007/s10640-015-9930-0.
24. Deutskens E., De Ruyter K., Wetzels M., Oosterveld P. Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Marketing Letters 2004, 15(1):21-36.
25. Englin J., Lambert D., Shaw W.D. A structural equations approach to modeling consumptive recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1997, 33:33-43.
26. ESRI How Kernel density works. ArcGIS resource center-desktop 10 2011, [online] URL:. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/How_Kernel_Density_works/009z00000011000000/.
27. ESRI How spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran's I) works. ArcGIS resource center-desktop 10 2012, [online] URL:. http://help.arcgis.com/EN/ArcGISDesktop/10.0/help/index.html#/How_Spatial_Autocorrelation_Global_Moran_s_I_works/005p0000000t000000/.
28. ESRI Collect events (Spatial statistics). ArcGIS Resource Center-Desktop 10 2014, [online] URL:. http://resources.arcgis.com/EN/HELP/MAIN/10.2/index.html#//005p0000003s000000.
29. ESRI Modeling spatial relationships. ArcGIS Pro. 2015, [online] URL:. http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/modeling-spatial-relationships.htm.
30. ESRI How similarity search works. ArcGIS Pro. 2015, [online] URL:. http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/how-similarity-search-works.htm.
31. Ewing G.O. Progress and problems in the development of recreational trip generation and trip distribution models. Leisure Sciences 1980, 3(1):1-24.
32. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. Community stakeholders knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators 2012, 18:421-433.
33. Getis A., Ord K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 1992, 24(3):189-206.
34. Haab T.C., McConnell K.E. Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
35. Hanley N., Shaw W.D., Wright R.E. The new economics of outdoor recreation 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
36. Hausman J.A., Leonard G.K., McFadden D. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. Journal of Public Economics 1995, 56:11-30.
37. Hoehn J.P., Loomis J.B. Substitution effects in the valuation of multiple environmental programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1993, 25:561-575.
38. Hunt L.M., Boots B., Kanaroglou P.S. Spatial choice modelling: new opportunities to incorporate space into substitution patterns. Progress in Human Geography 2004, 28(6):746-766.
39. Hunziker M., Buchecker M., Hartig T. Space and place -two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. A changing world challenges for landscape research 2007, 47-62. Springer Landscape Series 8, Berlin, New York, Springer. F. Kienast, S. Ghosh, O. Wildi (Eds.).
40. Hunziker M., Felber P., Gehring K., Buchecker M., Bauer N., Kienast F. Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups: results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Research and Development 2008, 28:140-147.
41. Hynes S., Hanley N., Scarpa R. Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 90(4):1011-1027.
42. Johnston R.J., Ramachandran M. Modeling spatial patchiness and hot spots in stated preference willingness to pay. Environmental and Resource Economics 2013, 59(3):363-387.
43. Jørgensen S.L., Olsen S.B., Ladenburg J., Martinsen L., Svenningsen S.R., Hasler B. Spatially induced disparities in users' and non-users' WTP for water quality improvements-testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay. Ecological Economics 2013, 92:58-66.
44. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective 1989, University Press, Cambridge.
45. Landuyt L., Broekx S., D'hondt R., Engelen G., Aertsens J., Goethals P.L.M. A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2013, 46:1-11.
46. Lloyd R. Spatial cognition. Geographic environments 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK.
47. Lo L. Substitutability, spatial structure, and spatial interaction. Geographical Analysis 1991, 23(2):132-146.
48. Lyon K., Cottrell S.P., Siikamäki P., Van Marwijk R. Biodiversity hotspots and visitor flows in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 2011, 11(1):100-111.
49. MEA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
50. Mitchell A. The ESRI guide to GIS analysis 2005, Vol. 2. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, USA.
51. Moons E., Saveyn B., Proost S., Hermy M. Optimal location of new forests in a suburban region. Journal of Forest Economics 2008, 14(1):5-27.
52. Nelson T.A., Boots B. Detecting spatially explicit hot spots in landscape-scale ecology. Ecography 2008, 31(5):556-566.
53. Neuvonen M., Sievänen T., Tönnes S., Koskela T. Access to green areas and the frequency of visits-a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2007, 6(4):235-247.
54. Pellegrini P.A., Fotheringham A.S. Modelling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration context. Progress in Human Geography 2002, 26(4):487-510.
55. Peterson G.L., Stynes D.J., Rosenthal D.H., Dwyer J.F. Substitution in recreation choice behavior. Recreation Choice Behavior Symposium 1984.
56. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 2013, 28(6):1053-1065.
57. Ratcliffe J.H. The hotspot matrix: a framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Practice and Research 2004, 5(1):5-23.
58. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 2008, 141(10):2417-2431.
59. Ripley B.D. Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Series B (Methodological) 1977, 39(2):172-212.
60. Scarpa R., Tempesta T., Thiene M. Non-participation, demand intensity and substitution effects in an integrable demand system: the case of day trips to the North-Eastern Alps. The new economics of outdoor recreation 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. N. Hanley, W.D. Shaw, R.E. Wright (Eds.).
61. Schaafsma M., Brouwer R. Testing geographical framing and substitution effects in spatial choice experiments. The Journal of Choice Modelling 2013, 8:32-48.
62. Schaafsma M., Brouwer R., Gilbert A., van den Bergh J., Wagtendonk A. Estimation of distance-decay functions to account for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in stated preference research. Land Economics 2013, 89(3):514-537.
63. Schaafsma M., Brouwer R., Rose J. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 2012, 79:21-31.
64. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006, 96(3):491-507.
65. Silverman B. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, in monographs on statistics and applied probability 1986, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
66. Soini K. Exploring human dimensions of multifunctional landscapes through mapping and map-making. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 57:225-239.
67. Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering Totale bevolking naar leeftijd en geslacht per gewest (Total population by age and sex per region 2014.
68. Thiene M., Scarpa R. Hiking in the Alps: exploring substitution patterns of hiking destinations. Tourism Economics 2008, 14(2):263-282.
69. Tyrväinen L., Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39(2):205-223.
70. Wood L.J. Perception studies in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1970, 50:129-142.