Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 13, Issue , 2015, Pages 108-118

  Peña, Lorena ^a   Casado Arzuaga, Izaskun ^a   Onaindia, Miren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aesthetic preferences; Cultural ecosystem services; GIS; Landscape management; Spatially explicit indicator

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930178339     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arnberger A., Haider W. Would you displace? It Depends! A multivariate visual approach to intended displacement from an urban forest trail. J. Leisure Res. 2007, 39:245-365.
2. Ban N.C., Mills M., Tam J., Hicks C.C., Klain S., Stoeckl N., Bottrill M.C., Levine J., Pressey R.L., Satterfield T., Chan K.M.A. A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11:194-202.
3. Basque Government, 2009. Hábitats EUNIS in 1: 10,000 scale. Environmental and Landscape Policy Department of the Basque Government, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
4. Brown G., Montag J.M., Lyon K. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2012, 25:633-651.
5. Brown G., Raymond C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr. 2007, 27:89-111.
6. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., Macdonald D.H. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 2010, 97:111-122.
7. Burkhard B., de Groot R., Costanza R., Seppelt R., JArgensen S.E., Potschin M. Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:1-6.
8. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272.
9. Casado-Arzuaga I., Madariaga I., Onaindia M. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129:33-43.
10. Casado-Arzuaga I., Onaindia M., Madariaga I., Verburg P.H. Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29:1393-1405.
11. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18.
12. Conrad E., Christie M., Fazey I. Understanding public perceptions of landscape: a case study from Gozo, Malta. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31:159-170.
13. CPSS, 2005. Catálogo Abierto de Paisajes Singulares y Sobresalientes de la CAPV -Anteproyecto -Tomo I. Principios generales para la elaboración del Catálogo. Dirección de Biodiversidad y Participación Ambiental. Departamento de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio, Gobierno Vasco.
14. Crossman N.D., Burkhard B., Nedkov S., Willemen L., Petz K., Palomo I., Drakou E.G., Martín-López B., Mc Phearson T., Boyanova K., Alkemade R., Egoh B., Dunbar M.B., Maes J. A blue print for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:4-14.
15. Daily G. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington, DC.
16. Daniel T.C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., Costanza R., Elmqvist T., Flint C.G., Gobster P.H., Grêt-Regamey A., Lave R., Muhar S., Penker M., Ribe R.G., Schauppenlehner T., Sikor T., Soloviy I., Spierenburg M., Taczanowska K., Tam J., von der Dunk A. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:8812-8819.
17. Daw T., Brown K., Rosendo S., Pomeroy R. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38:370-379.
18. Egoh B., Drakou E.G., Dunbar M.B., Maes J., Willemen L. Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review 2012, Report EUR 25456 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
19. Frank S., Fürst C., Koschke L., Witt A., Makeschin F. Assessment of landscape esthetics -validation of a landscape metrics -based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 32:222-231.
20. Fuller R.A., Irvine K.N., Devine-Wright P., Warren P.H., Gaston K.J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:390-394.
21. Gobster P.H., Nassauer J.I., Daniel T.C., Fry G. The shared landscape: what does esthetics have to do with ecology?. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:959-972.
22. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamaäki O., Maes J., Wittmer H., Jax K. Maps have an air of authority: potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:25-32.
23. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., de Groot R., Verburg P.H., Heller I., Wascher D., Haines-Young R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44:1099-1120.
24. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S., Makeschin F. A multicriteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:54-66.
25. Lamarque P., Tappeiner U., Turner C., Steinbacher M., Bardgett R.D., Szukics U., Schermer M., Lavorel S. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg. Environ. Change 2011, 11:791-804.
26. Loidi J., Ortega M., Orrantia O. Vegetation science and the implementation of the habitat directive in Spain: up-to-now experiences and further development to provide tools for management. Fitosociologia 2007, 44:9-16.
27. Maes, J., Braat, L., Jax, K.,Hutchins, M., Furman, E., Termansen, M., Luque, S., Paracchini, M.S., Chauvin, C., Williams, R., Volk, M., Lautenbach, S., Kopperoinen, L., Schelhaas, M.J., Weinert, J., Goossen, M., Dumont, E., Strauch, M., Görg, C., Dormann, C., Katwinkel, M., Zulian, G., Varjopuro, R., Ratamäki, O., Hauck, J., Forsius, M., Hengeveld, G., Perez-Soba, M., Bouraoui, F., Scholz, M., Schulz-Zunkel, C., Lepistö, A., Polishchuk, Y., Bidoglio, G., 2011. A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis: phase 1. PEER Report No 3. Partnership for European Environmental Research, Ispra.
28. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:1-12.
29. Martínez-Harms M.J., Balvanera P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2012, 8:17-25.
30. McClintock N., Pallana E., Wooten H. Urban livestock ownership, management, and regulation in the United States: an exploratory survey and research agenda. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:426-440.
31. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-Being Synthesis 2005, MEA, Island Press, Washington.
32. Milcu A.I., Hanspach J., Abson D., Fischer J. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18:44.
33. Nahuelhual L., Carmona A., Lozada P., Jaramillo A., Aguayo M. Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: an application at the local level in Southern Chile. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 40:71-82.
34. Norton L.R., Inwood H., Crowe A., Baker A. Trialling a method to quantify the 'cultural services' of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:449-455.
35. Onaindia M., Fernandez de Manuel B., Madariaga I., Rodríguez-Loinaz G. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2013, 289:1-9.
36. Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Kooperoinen L., Schägner J.P., Termansen M., Zandersen M., Perez-Soba M., Scholefield P.A., Bidoglio G. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 45:371-385.
37. Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Amezaga I., Onaindia M. Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 120:18-26.
38. Ryan R.L. The social landscape of planning: integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 2011, 100:361-363.
39. Schulp C.J.E., Alkemade R., Goldewijk K.K., Petz K. Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2012, 8:156-168.
40. Sherrouse B.C., Clement J.M., Semmens D.J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31:748-760.
41. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, TEEB, Earthscan, London and Washington. Pushpam Kumar (Ed.).
42. van Berkel D.B., Verburg P.H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 37:163-174.
43. van Jaarsveld A.S., Biggs R., Scholes R.J., Bohensky E., Reyers B., Lynam T., Musvoto C., Fabricius C. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:425-441.
44. van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Petz K., Alkemade R., Hein L., de Groot R.S. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:110-122.
45. van Riper C.J., Kyle G.T., Sutton S.G., Barnes M., Sherrouse B.C. Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 35:164-173.
46. van Riper C.J., Manning R.E., Monz C., Goonan K.A. Tradeoffs among resource, social, and managerial conditions on mountain summits of the Northern Forest. Leisure Sci. 2011, 33:228-249.
47. Villa, A., 2010. Servicios ecosistemicos en las Reservas de la Biosfera deAndalucia, España: expresiones culturales y turísticas. In: Reservas de la Biosfera: su contribución a la provisión de servicios de los ecosistemas; experiencias exitosas en Iberoamérica. Ed., Valente, pp. 101-118.
48. Willemen L., Verburg P.H., Hein L., van Mensvoort M.E.F. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 2008, 88:34-43.
49. Zhen L., Ochirbat B., Lv Y., Wei Y.J., Liu X.L., Chen J.Q., Yao Z.J., Li F. Comparing patterns of ecosystem service consumption and perceptions of range management between ethnic herders in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5:015001.