Participatory mapping to identify indigenous community use zones: Implications for conservation planning in southern Suriname

Journal for Nature Conservation

Volumn 29, Issue , 2016, Pages 69-78

  Ramirez Gomez, Sara O I ^a,b,c   Brown, Greg ^d   Verweij, Pita A ^b   Boot, René ^e,f  

^a Conservation International Suriname ^*  (Suriname)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Tropenbos International Suriname Prof Dr Ruinardlaan   (Suriname)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e Tropenbos International   (Netherlands)

^f UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Community use zones; Ecosystem services; Indigenous conservation; Landscape ecology; Participatory mapping

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MAPPING;

SURINAME;

EID: 84954556234     PISSN: 16171381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alexiades M.N. Mobility and migration in indigenous amazonia: contemporary ethnoecological perspectives 2013, Berghahn Books.
2. Andrade G.S.M., Rhodes J.R. Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies?. Ecology and Society 2012, 17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art14/.
3. Arnot C.D., Luckert M.K., Boxall P.C. What is tenure security? conceptual implications for empirical analysis. Land Economics 2011, 87:297-311.
4. Bagstad K.J., Johnson G.W., Voigt B., Villa F. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services 2013, 4:117-125.
5. Baker W.L. The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecology 1992, 7:181-194.
6. Bánki O., Aguirre J. Mapping the unexplored forest of Suriname. Report of a pilot study to develop a land cover and vegetation map for southern Suriname 2011, University of Amsterdam and Conservation International Suriname.
7. Ban N.C., Mills M., Tam J., Hicks C.C., Klain S., Stoeckl N., et al. A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environ 2013, 11:194-202.
8. Batisse M. The biosphere reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation 1982, 9:101-111.
9. Bennett A.F. Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation, conserving forest ecosystems series 2003, IUCN-the World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
10. Bennett D.E., Sierra R. Multi-scale dimensions of indigenous land tenure in the amazon. Human Ecology 2014, 42:551-563.
11. Berkes F. Implementing ecosystem-based management: evolution or revolution?. Fish and Fisheries 2012, 13:465-476.
12. Bernard E., Barbosa L., Carvalho R. Participatory GIS in a sustainable use reserve in Brazilian Amazonia: implications for management and conservation. Applied Geography 2011, 31:564-572.
13. Brown, Reed Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 2000, 46:240-247.
14. Brown G. The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services 2013, 5:58-68.
15. Brown G., Fagerholm N. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services 2014, 13:119-133.
16. Brown G.G., Pullar D.V. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2012, 26:231-246.
17. Brown G.G., Reed P. Social landscape metrics: measures for understanding place values from public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Landscape Research 2012, 37:73-90.
18. Brown G., Weber D., Zanon D., de Bie K. Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2012, 24:534-545.
19. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., Macdonald D.H. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 97:111-122.
20. J. Campese (Ed.). Rights-based approaches: exploring issues and opportunities for conservation 2009, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
21. Canasur Gold, 2014. New concessions fully registered in Suriname.
22. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Díaz S., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2009, 106:1305-1312.
23. Chan K.M.A., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., Underwood E.C., Daily G.C. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology 2006, 4:e379.
24. Chao S. Forest peoples: numbers across the world 2012, Forest Peoples Programme.
25. Chapin F.S., Carpenter S.R., Kofinas G.P., Folke C., Abel N., Clark W.C., et al. Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2010, 25:241-249.
26. Colchester M. Self-determination or environmental determinism for indigenous peoples in tropical forest conservation. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:1365-1367.
27. Colchester M. Who will garrison the fortress? A reply to Spinage. Oryx 1998, 32:245-248.
28. Cowling R.M., Egoh B., Knight A.T., O'Farrell P.J., Reyers B., Rouget M., et al. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105:9483-9488.
29. Crossman N.D., Burkhard B., Nedkov S., Willemen L., Petz K., Palomo I., et al. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 2013, 4:4-14.
30. Cumming G.S. Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecology 2011, 26:899-909.
31. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7:21-28.
32. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7:260-272.
33. Dramstad W., Olson J.D., Forman R.T.T. Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning 1996, Island Press, Washington, DC., USA.
34. Egoh B., Rouget M., Reyers B., Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., van Jaarsveld A.S., et al. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecological Economics 2007, 63:714-721.
35. Fabricius C., Folke C., Cundill G., Schultz L. Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society 2007, 12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org.proxy.library.uu.nl/vol12/iss1/art29/.
36. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. Community stakeholders' knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators 2012, 18:421-433.
37. Farina A. Landscape ecology in action 2000, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
38. Fahrig L. How much habitat is enough?. Biological Conservation 2001, 100:65-74.
39. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:643-653.
40. Fisher J.A., Patenaude G., Giri K., Lewis K., Meir P., Pinho P., et al. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosystem Services 2014, 7:34-45.
41. Heemskerk M., Delvoye K. Trio baseline study: a sustainable livelihoods perspective on the Trio indignous peoples of south Suriname 2007, Amazon Conservation Team, Suriname.
42. Heemskerk M., Delvoye K., Noordam D., Teunissen P. Wayana baseline study: a sustainable livelihood approach on the Wayana Indigenous peoples living around Puleowime (Apetina), Palumeu and Kawemhakan (Anapaike) in Southeast Suriname 2006, Amazon Conservation Team, Suriname.
43. Kothari, A., Corrigan, C., Jonas, H., Neumann, A., Shrumm, H., Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2014. Recognizing and supporting territories and areas conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities: Global overview and national case studies. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, ICCA, Consortium, Kalpavriksh and Natural Justice, Montreal, Canada. Technical Series no. 64, 160pp.
44. Larson A.M., Barry D., Ram Dahal G. New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. International Forest Review 2010, 12:78-96.
45. Lele S., Wilshusen P., Brockington D., Seidler R., Bawa K. Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010, 2:94-100.
46. McLain R., Poe M., Biedenweg K., Cerveny L., Besser D., Blahna D. Making sense of human ecology mapping: an overview of approaches to integrating socio-spatial data into environmental planning. Human Ecology 2013, 41:651-665.
47. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
48. Miranda, C., Vadillo, A., 2012. Recognition and support of ICCA's in Bolivia. In: Kothari, A. 2014. Recognizing and supporting territories and areas conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities: Global overview and national case studies. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, ICCA, Consortium, Kalpavriksh, and Natural Justice, Montreal, Canada. Technical Series no. 64, 160pp.
49. Nassauer J.I., Opdam P. Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23:633-644.
50. Opdam P., Wascher D. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation 2004, 117:285-297.
51. Oviedo G. Community conserved areas in South America. Parks 2006, 16:49-55.
52. Pagella T.F., Sinclair F.L. Development and use of a typology of mapping tools to assess their fitness for supporting management of ecosystem service provision. Landscape Ecology 2014, 29:383-399.
53. Palomo I., Martín-López B., Potschin M., Haines-Young R., Montes C. National parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services 2013, 4:104-116.
54. Pérez-Llorente I., Paneque-Gálvez J., Luz A.C., Macía M.J., Guèze M., Domínguez-Gómez J.A., et al. Changing indigenous cultures, economies and landscapes: the case of the Tsimane', Bolivian Amazon. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 120:147-157.
55. Persha L., Agrawal A., Chhatre A. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science 2011, 331:1606-1608.
56. Poppy G.M., Chiotha S., Eigenbrod F., Harvey C.A., Honzak M., Hudson M.D., et al. Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society. B Biological Sciences 2014, 369:20120288.
57. Poppy G.M., Jepson P.C., Pickett J.A., Birkett M.A. Achieving food and environmental security: new approaches to close the gap. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2014, 369:20120272.
58. Porter-Bolland L., Ellis E.A., Guariguata M.R., Ruiz-Mallén I., Negrete-Yankelevich S., Reyes-García V. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest Ecology and Management 2012, 268:6-17.
59. Ramirez-Gomez S.O.I., Brown G.G., Tjon Sie Fat A. Participatory mapping with indigenous communities for conservation: challenges and lessons from suriname. Electronic Journal of Information System in Developing Countries. 2013, 58:1-22.
60. Ramirez-Gomez S.O.I., Martínez C. Participatory GIS: indigenous communities in Suriname identify key local sites. ESRI 2013, 35:22.
61. Ramirez-Gomez S.O.I., Torres-Vitolas C.A., Schreckenberg K., Honzák M., Cruz-Garcia G.S., Willcock S., et al. Analysis of ecosystem services provision in the Colombian Amazon using participatory research and mapping techniques. Ecosystem Services 2015, 13:93-107.
62. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:5242-5247.
63. Rempel R., Carr A. Patch analyst and patch grid. Ontario ministry of natural resources 2012, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
64. Reyers B., Biggs R., Cumming G.S., Elmqvist T., Hejnowicz A.P., Polasky S. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2013, 11:268-273.
65. Schägner J.P., Brander L., Maes J., Hartje V. Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services. Special Issue on Mapping and Modelling Ecosystem Services 2013, 4:33-46.
66. Schwartzman S., Zimmerman B. Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:721-727.
67. Serna-Chavez H.M., Schulp C.J.E., van Bodegom P.M., Bouten W., Verburg P.H., Davidson M.D. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 2014, 39:24-33.
68. Sherrouse B.C., Clement J.M., Semmens D.J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography 2011, 31:748-760.
69. Suriname Business Forum, 2010. Renewable energy potential and business opportunities in Suriname.
70. Syrbe R.-U., Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:80-88.
71. Termorshuizen J.W., Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24:1037-1052.
72. Tischendorf L., Fahrig L. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 2000, 90:7-19.
73. VIDS, 2012. Recognition and support of ICCAs in Suriname. In: Kothari, A. 2014. Recognizing and supporting territories and areas conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities: global overview and national case studies. Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, ICCA, Consortium, Kalpavriksh, and Natural Justice, Montreal, Canada. Technical Series no. 64, 160pp.
74. Villa F., Voigt B., Erickson J.D. New perspectives in ecosystem services science as instruments to understand environmental securities. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society. B Biological Sciences 2014, 369:20120286.
75. Willemen L., Drakou E.G., Dunbar M.B., Mayaux P., Egoh B.N. Safeguarding ecosystem services and livelihoods: understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society. Ecosystem Services 2013, 4:95-103.
76. Williams J.C., ReVelle C.S., Levin S.A. Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2005, 10:163-181.