Projections: From a graduate tell class to the practical world of L2 teachers

CALICO Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 349-375

  Ebsworth, Miriam Eisenstein ^a   Kim, Alexis Jeong ^b   Klein, Tristin J ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW JERSEY CITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer pedagogy; Computer assisted language learning (CALL); Language teacher technology education; Second language technology course evaluation; Technology enhanced language learning (TELL)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044916547     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.27.2.349-375     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anzul, M., Ely, M., Freidman, T., Garner, D., & McCormack-Steinmetz, A. (1991). Doing qualitative re-search: Circles within circles. New York: The Falmer Press.
2. Bao, H. (2006). “Computer means/changes in my life”: ESL students and computer-mediated technol-ogy. Electronic Magazine of Multicultural Education, 8(1), 1-9. Retrieved October 23, 2009, from http://www.eastern.edu/publications/emme/2006spring/bao.html
3. Bodgan, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and meth-ods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Burston, J. (2003). Proving IT Works. CALICO Journal, 20, 219-226. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
5. Chatel, R. (2002). New technology, new literacy: Creating a bridge for English language learners. The New England Reading Association Journal, 38(3), 45-49.
6. Chapelle, C. (2005). Hints about CALL use from research. PacCALL Journal, 1(1), 1-8.
7. Chapelle, C., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). The language teacher in the 21st century. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 297-313). Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for using CALL. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
9. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thou-sand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1990). Education 2001: Learning networks and educational reform. Computers in the Schools, 7, 1-29.
11. Daud, N., & Husin, Z. (2004). Developing critical thinking skills in computer-aided extended reading class-es. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 477-487.
12. Deumert, A., & Spratt, C. (2005). Authentic teachings as the context for language learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8, 83-93.
13. DeVillar, R. A., & Faltis, C. J. (1991). Computers and cultural diversity: Restructuring for school success. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Earp, S. (1997). More than just the internet: Technology for language teaching. ERIC Digest. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed414767.html
15. Egbert, J., Paulus, T., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technol-ogy, 6(3), 108-126. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert
16. Egbert, J., & Petrie, G. (2005). CALL research perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
17. Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology in-tegration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
18. Furger, R. (1999, September). Are wired schools failing our kids? PC World, 149-162.
19. Grau, I. (1996, January). Teacher development in technology instruction: Does computer coursework transfer into actual teaching practice? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394949)
20. Hinkelman, D., & Pysock, J. (1992). The need for multi-media ESL teaching methods: A psychological investigation into learning styles. Cross Currents, 19(1), 25-36.
21. Honey, M., & Moeller, B. (1990). Teacher’s beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings (CTE Technical Report, 6). New York: Center for Children and Technology Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://cct2.edc.org/ccthome/reports/tr6.html
22. Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25, 175-188. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
23. Jamieson, J., Chapelle, C., & Preiss, S. (2005). CALL evaluation by developers, a teacher, and stu-dents. CALICO Journal, 23, 93-138. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://calico.org/page. php?id=5
24. Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do bet-ter? In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 23-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Kim, J. (2004). A teacher education course in integrating educational technology in L2 classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
26. Kim, H. (2008). Beyond motivation: ESL/EFL teachers’ perceptions of the role of computers. CALICO Journal, 25, 240-259. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
27. Lee, K.-W. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. Internet TESOL Journal, 6(12). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
28. Lee, R. (2006). Effective learning outcomes of ESL elementary and secondary school students utilizing educational technology infused with constructivist pedagogy. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33, 87-93.
29. Levine, A., Ferenz, O., & Reves, T. (2000). EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESL-EJ, 4(4). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej16/a1.html
30. Luke, C., & Britten, J. (2007). The expanding role of technology in foreign language teacher education programs. CALICO Journal, 24, 253-267. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
31. Meskill, C., Mossop, J., DiAngelo, S., & Pasquale, R. (2002). Expert and novice teachers talking tech-nology: Precepts, concepts, and misconcepts. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 46-57. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/meskill
32. Mukti, N. (2000). Computer technology in Malaysia: Teachers’ background characteristics, attitudes and concerns. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 3(8), 1-13.
33. Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (1998). Investigating implementation strategies for www-based learning environ-ments. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25, 121-139.
34. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega
35. Padron, Y., & Waxman, H. (1996). Improving the teaching and learning of English language learners through instructional technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23, 341-355.
36. Reynard, R. (2003, March). Using the Internet as an instructional tool: ESL distance learning. In Using the internet as an instructional tool: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. Retrieved August 30, 2008, from http://frank.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed03/index.html
37. Rilling, S., Dahlman, A., Dodson, S., Boyles, C., & Pazvant, O. (2005). Connecting CALL theory and practice in preservice teacher education and beyond: Processes and products. CALICO Journal, 22, 213-235. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
38. Salant, P., & Dillman, D. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
39. Slaouti, D., & Motteram, G. (2006). Reconstructing practice: Language teacher education and ICT. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 81-98). Amsterdam: John Benja-mins.
40. Spradly, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.
41. Sun, Y. (2003). Learning process, strategies, and web-based concordancers: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 601-613.
42. Velazquez-Torres, N. (2006). How well are ESL teachers being prepared to integrate technology in their classrooms? TESL-EJ, 9(4). Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/past-issues/volume9/ej36/ej36a1
43. Wang, Y. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers’ perception of the teacher’s role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 150-161.
44. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
45. Waters, J. (2007). ESL technologies: The universal language. T.H.E. Journal, 34(1). Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2007/01/01/ESL-Technologies--The-Universal-Language.aspx?sc_lang=en&Page=1
46. Wetzel, K., & Chisholm, I. (1998). An evaluation of technology integration in teacher education for bilingual and English as a second language education majors. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 379-398.
47. White, J. A., & Purdom, D. M. (1996). Viewing modern instructional technology through conceptions of curriculum. Educational Technology Review, 6, 5-9.
48. Woodrow, J. (1991). Teachers’ perceptions of computer needs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 475-496.
49. Zha, S., Kelly, P., & Park, M. (2006). An investigation of communicative competence of ESL students using electronic discussion boards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 349-67.