Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation and memory performance: sources of uncertainty in epidemiological cohort studies

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2018, Pages

  Brzozek, Christopher ^a   Benke, Kurt K ^b,c   Zeleke, Berihun M ^a   Abramson, Michael J ^a   Benke, Geza ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b The University of Melbourne   (Australia)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aleatory uncertainty; Cognitive function; Epistemic uncertainty; Memory; Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GRAPHICAL METHOD; HEALTH IMPACT; MEMORY; MOBILE PHONE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DATA BASE; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; HUMAN; MEMORY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; REVIEW; SIMULATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; MOBILE PHONE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNCERTAINTY;

CELL PHONE; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; MEMORY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RADIO WAVES; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 85044729649     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040592     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Mobile Phones. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/ (accessed on 17 October 2017).
2. Ahlbom, A., Bridges, J., de Seze, R., Hillert, L., Juutilainen, J., Mattsson, M.O., Neubauer, G., Schuz, J., Simko, M., Bromen, K. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health—Opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENIHR). Toxicology 2008, 246, 248–250. [PubMed]
3. Van Deventer, E., van Rongen, E., Saunders, R. WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2011, 32, 417–421. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39, 675–694. [CrossRef]
5. Baan, R., Grosse, Y., Lauby-Secretan, B., El Ghissassi, F., Bouvard, V., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Islami, F., Galichet, L., Straif, K. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 2011, 12, 624–626. [CrossRef]
6. Roser, K., Schoeni, A., Burgi, A., Roosli, M. Development of an RF-EMF Exposure Surrogate for Epidemiologic Research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 5634–5656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Communications Report 2015-16. Available online: https://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/Library/researchacma/Research-reports/communications-report-201516 (accessed on 17 October 2017).
8. Abramson, M.J., Benke, G.P., Dimitriadis, C., Inyang, I.O., Sim, M.R.; Wolfe, R.S., Croft, R.J. Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics 2009, 30, 678–686. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Thomas, S., Benke, G., Dimitriadis, C., Inyang, I., Sim, M.R., Wolfe, R., Croft, R.J., Abramson, M.J. Use of mobile phones and changes in cognitive function in adolescents. Occup. Environ. Med. 2010, 67, 861–866. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Inyang, I., Benke, G., Morrissey, J., McKenzie, R., Abramson, M. How well do adolescents recall use of mobile telephones? Results of a validation study. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2009, 9, 36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Vrijheid, M., Cardis, E., Armstrong, B.K., Auvinen, A., Berg, G., Blaasaas, K.G., Brown, J., Carroll, M., Chetrit, A., Christensen, H.C., et al. Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 63, 237–243. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Goedhart, G., Kromhout, H.; Wiart, J., Vermeulen, R. Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 72, 812–818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Samkange-Zeeb, F., Berg, G., Blettner, M. Validation of self-reported cellular phone use. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2004, 14, 245–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Schoeni, A., Roser, K., Roosli, M. Memory performance, wireless communication and exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A prospective cohort study in adolescents. Environ. Int. 2015, 85, 343–351. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Beason-Held, L.L., Golski, S., Kraut, M.A., Esposito, G., Resnick, S.M. Brain activation during encoding and recognition of verbal and figural information in older adults. Neurobiol. Aging 2005, 26, 237–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Strandberg, M., Elfgren, C., Mannfolk, P., Olsrud, J., Stenberg, L., van Westen, D., Larsson, E.M., Rorsman, I., Kallen, K. fMRI memory assessment in healthy subjects: A new approach to view lateralization data at an individual level. Brain Imaging Behav. 2011, 5, 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Redmayne, M., Smith, C.L., Benke, G., Croft, R.J., Dalecki, A., Dimitriadis, C., Kaufman, J., Macleod, S., Sim, M.R.; Wolfe, R., et al. Use of mobile and cordless phones and cognition in Australian primary school children: A prospective cohort study. Environ. Health 2016, 15, 26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Bhatt, C.R., Benke, G., Smith, C.L., Redmayne, M., Dimitriadis, C., Dalecki, A., Macleod, S., Sim, M.R., Croft, R.J.; Wolfe, R., et al. Use of mobile and cordless phones and change in cognitive function: A prospective cohort analysis of Australian primary school children. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Draper, D. Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 45–97.
20. Elith, J., Burgman, M.A., Regan, H.M. Mapping epistemic uncertainties and vague concepts in predictions of species distribution. Ecol. Modell. 2002, 157, 313–329. [CrossRef]
21. Benke, K.K., Hamilton, A.J., Lowell, K.E. Uncertainty analysis and risk assessment in the management of environmental resources. Aust. J. Environ. Manag. 2007, 14, 243–249. [CrossRef]
22. Wagener, T., Gupta, H.V. Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2005, 19, 378–387. [CrossRef]
23. Regan, H.M., Colyvan, M., Burgman, M.A. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12, 618–628. [CrossRef]
24. Refsgaard, J.C., van der Sluijs, J.P., Højberg, A.L., Vanrolleghem, P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process—A framework and guidance. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22, 1543–1556. [CrossRef]
25. Robinson, N.J., Benke, K.K., Norng, S. Identification and interpretation of sources of uncertainty in soils change in a global systems-based modelling process. Soil Res. 2015, 53, 592–604. [CrossRef]
26. Benke, K.K., Lowell, K.E., Hamilton, A.J. Parameter Uncertainty, Sensitivity Analysis and Prediction Error in a Water-Balance Hydrological Model. Math. Comput. Modell. 2008, 47, 1134–1149. [CrossRef]
27. Benke, K.K., Benke, K.E. Uncertainty in risks from artificial lighting due to disruption of circadian rhythm and melatonin secretion: A Review. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2013, 19, 916–929. [CrossRef]
28. Boehmert, C., Wiedemann, P., Croft, R. Improving Precautionary Communication in the EMF Field? Effects of Making Messages Consistent and Explaining the Effectiveness of Precautions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Inyang, I., Benke, G., McKenzie, R., Wolfe, R., Abramson, M.J. A new method to determine laterality of mobile telephone use in adolescents. Occup. Environ. Med. 2010, 67, 507–512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Beekhuizen, J., Vermeulen, R., van Eijsden, M., van Strien, R., Burgi, A., Loomans, E., Guxens, M., Kromhout, H., Huss, A. Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies. Environ. Int. 2014, 67, 22–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Beekhuizen, J., Vermeulen, R., Kromhout, H., Burgi, A., Huss, A. Geospatial modelling of electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 445–446, 202–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Beekhuizen, J., Kromhout, H., Burgi, A., Huss, A., Vermeulen, R. What input data are needed to accurately model electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations? J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 53–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Gajsek, P., Ravazzani, P., Wiart, J., Grellier, J., Samaras, T., Thuroczy, G. Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz). J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 37–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Aminzadeh, R., Thielens, A., Agneessens, S., Van Torre, P., Van den Bossche, M., Dongus, S., Eeftens, M., Huss, A., Vermeulen, R., de Seze, R., et al. A Multi-Band Body-Worn Distributed Radio-Frequency Exposure Meter: Design, On-Body Calibration and Study of Body Morphology. Sensors 2018, 18, 272. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Thielens, A., Van den Bossche, M., Brzozek, C., Bhatt, C.R., Abramson, M.J., Benke, G., Martens, L., Joseph, W. Representativeness and repeatability of microenvironmental personal and head exposures to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields. Environ. Res. 2018, 162, 81–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. VanderWeele, T.J., Robins, J.M. Directed acyclic graphs, sufficient causes, and the properties of conditioning on a common effect. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 1096–1104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Westreich, D., Greenland, S. The Table 2 fallacy: Presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 177, 292–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Burns, C.J.; Wright, J.M., Pierson, J.B., Bateson, T.F., Burstyn, I., Goldstein, D.A., Klaunig, J.E., Luben, T.J., Mihlan, G., Ritter, L., et al. Evaluating uncertainty to strengthen epidemiologic data for use in human health risk assessments. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 1160–1165. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Sadetzki, S., Langer, C.E., Bruchim, R., Kundi, M., Merletti, F., Vermeulen, R., Kromhout, H., Lee, A.K., Maslanyj, M., Sim, M.R., et al. The MOBI-Kids Study Protocol: Challenges in Assessing Childhood and Adolescent Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Wireless Telecommunication Technologies and Possible Association with Brain Tumor Risk. Front. Public Health 2014, 2, 124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Langer, C.E., de Llobet, P., Dalmau, A.; Wiart, J., Goedhart, G., Hours, M., Benke, G.P., Bouka, E., Bruchim, R., Choi, K.H., et al. Patterns of cellular phone use among young people in 12 countries: Implications for RF exposure. Environ. Int. 2017, 107, 65–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. De Vocht, F., Burstyn, I., Sanguanchaiyakrit, N. Rethinking cumulative exposure in epidemiology, again. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 467–473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Kriebel, D., Checkoway, H., Pearce, N. Exposure and dose modelling in occupational epidemiology. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007, 64, 492–498. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Checkoway, H., Rice, C.H. Time-weighted averages, peaks, and other indices of exposure in occupational epidemiology. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1992, 21, 25–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Blair, A., Stewart, P.A. Do quantitative exposure assessments improve risk estimates in occupational studies of cancer? Am. J. Ind. Med. 1992, 21, 53–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Smith, T.J. Occupational exposure and dose over time: Limitations of cumulative exposure. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1992, 21, 35–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Guxens, M., Vermeulen, R., van Eijsden, M., Beekhuizen, J., Vrijkotte, T.G., van Strien, R.T., Kromhout, H., Huss, A. Outdoor and indoor sources of residential radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, personal cell phone and cordless phone use, and cognitive function in 5–6 years old children. Environ. Res. 2016, 150, 364–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Jurek, A.M., Maldonado, G., Greenland, S., Church, T.R. Exposure-measurement error is frequently ignored when interpreting epidemiologic study results. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 21, 871–876. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Moffatt, S., Mulloli, T.P., Bhopal, R., Foy, C., Phillimore, P. An exploration of awareness bias in two environmental epidemiology studies. Epidemiology 2000, 11, 199–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Cardis, E., Richardson, L., Deltour, I., Armstrong, B., Feychting, M., Johansen, C., Kilkenny, M., McKinney, P., Modan, B., Sadetzki, S., et al. The INTERPHONE study: Design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 22, 647–664. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Clark, K., Fleck, M.S., Mitroff, S.R. Enhanced change detection performance reveals improved strategy use in avid action video game players. Acta Psychol. 2011, 136, 67–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Bavelier, D., Achtman, R.L., Mani, M., Focker, J. Neural bases of selective attention in action video game players. Vis. Res. 2012, 61, 132–143. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Cain, M.S., Prinzmetal, W., Shimamura, A.P., Landau, A.N. Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Blacker, K.J., Curby, K.M. Enhanced visual short-term memory in action video game players. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 2013, 75, 1128–1136. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Colzato, L.S., van den Wildenberg, W.P., Zmigrod, S., Hommel, B. Action video gaming and cognitive control: Playing first person shooter games is associated with improvement in working memory but not action inhibition. Psychol. Res. 2013, 77, 234–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Shardell, M., Hicks, G.E. Statistical analysis with missing exposure data measured by proxy respondents: A misclassification problem within a missing-data problem. Stat. Med. 2014, 33, 4437–4452. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Agar, M., Koh, E.S., Gibbs, E., Barnes, E.H., Hovey, E., Livingstone, A., Sawkins, K., Chye, R., Lovell, M.R., Clark, K., et al. Validating self-report and proxy reports of the Dexamethasone Symptom Questionnaire—Chronic for the evaluation of longer-term corticosteroid toxicity. Support. Care Cancer 2016, 24, 1209–1218. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. De Sonneville, L. Amsterdam Neuropsychological Tasks: A computer-aided assessment program. Comput. Psychol. 1999, 6, 187–203.
58. Bhatt, C.R., Redmayne, M., Abramson, M.J., Benke, G. Instruments to assess and measure personal and environmental radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 2016, 39, 29–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Wilmer, H.H., Sherman, L.E., Chein, J.M. Smartphones and Cognition: A Review of Research Exploring the Links between Mobile Technology Habits and Cognitive Functioning. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 605. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., Wegner, D.M. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 2011, 333, 776–778. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Uncapher, M.R., M, K.T.; Wagner, A.D. Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2016, 23, 483–490. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Collie, A., Maruff, P., Darby, D.G., McStephen, M. The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2003, 9, 419–428. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Darby, D.G., Fredrickson, J., Pietrzak, R.H., Maruff, P., Woodward, M., Brodtmann, A. Reliability and usability of an internet-based computerized cognitive testing battery in community-dwelling older people. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 30, 199–205. [CrossRef]
64. Falleti, M.G., Maruff, P., Collie, A., Darby, D.G. Practice effects associated with the repeated assessment of cognitive function using the CogState battery at 10-minute, one week and one month test-retest intervals. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2006, 28, 1095–1112. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Mollica, C.M., Maruff, P., Collie, A., Vance, A. Repeated assessment of cognition in children and the measurement of performance change. Child Neuropsychol. 2005, 11, 303–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66. Amthauer, R. IST 2000 R: Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R, Hogrefe, Verlag für Psychologie: Bern, Switzerland, 2001.