Mapping epistemic uncertainties and vague concepts in predictions of species distribution

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 157, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 313-329

  Elith, Jane ^a   Burgman, Mark A ^a   Regan, Helen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Confidence intervals; Epistemic and linguistic uncertainty; Generalized linear models; Logistic regression; Model; Prediction; Vagueness; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; MAPPING; PREDICTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037202443     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00202-8     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Agresti, A., 1996. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York, 290 pp.
2. Akçakaya, H.R., McCarthy, M.A., Pearce, J.L., 1995. Linking landscape data with population viability analysis-management options for the Helmeted Honeyeater Lichenostomus melanops cassidix. Biol. Conserv. 73, 169-176.
3. Austin, M.P., 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: An interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol. Model. 157 (2-3), 101-118.
4. Augustin, N.H., Borchers, D.L., Clarke, E.D., Buckland, S.T., Walsh, M., 1998. Spatiotemporal modelling for the annual egg production method of stock assessment using generalized additive models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 2608-2621.
5. Bastin, L., Wood, J., Fisher, P.F., 1999. Visualization of fuzzy spatial information in spatial decision-making. In: Lowell, K., Jaton, A. (Eds.), Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Resources. Third International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, pp. 151-156.
6. Beard, M.K., Buttenfield, B.P., Clapham, S.B., 1991. Visualization of spatial data quality. NCGIA Technical Paper 91-26, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis; Maine, USA. Available at http://www.ncgia.ucs-b.edu/Publications/Tech_Reports/91/91-26.pdf
7. Bio, A.M.F., 2000. Does Vegetation Suit our Models? Data and Model Assumptions and the Assessment of Species Distribution in Space. PhD, published, Utrecht University.
8. Buchan, L.A.J., Padilla, D.K., 2000. Predicting the likelihood of Eurasian watermilfoil presence in lakes, a macrophyte monitoring tool. Ecol. Appl. 10, 1442-1455.
9. Buckland, S.T., Elston, D.A., 1993. Empirical models for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 30, 478-495.
10. Buckland, S.T., Burnham, K.P., Augustin, N.H., 1997. Model selection: An integral part of inference. Biometrics 53, 603-618.
11. Burgman, M.A., Ferson, S., Akçakaya, H.R., 1993. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, 314 pp.
12. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information - Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, 353 pp.
13. Burrough, P.A., 1986. Data quality, errors, and natural variation. In: Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 103-135.
14. Buttenfield, B.O., Weber, C.R., MacLennan, M., Elliott, J.D., 1991. Bibliography on animation of spatial data: A guide to literature, video and movie media. Technical Paper 91-22, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Maine, USA.
15. Capen, D.E., Fenwick, J.W., Inkley, D.B., Boynton, A.C., 1986. Multivariate models of songbird habitat in New England forests. In: Verner, J., Morrison, M.L., Ralph, C.J. (Eds.), Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates. Based on an International Symposium Held at Stanford Sierra Camp, Fallen Leaf Lake, California. The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin, pp. 171-175.
16. Cawsey, M. et al., 2002. Prediction of vegetation cover of the central Lachlan region of New South Wales, Australia: A case study in the practical use of statistical modelling. Biodivers. Conserv., in press.
17. Chatfield, C., 1995. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. 158, 419-466.
18. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37-46.
19. Collett, D., 1991. Modelling Binary Data. Chapman and Hall, London, 369 pp.
20. Colyvan, M., 2002. Is probability the only coherent approach to uncertainty? Risk Anal., in press.
21. Corsi, F., Duprè, E., Boitani, L., 1999. A large-scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 13, 150-159.
22. Crosetto, M., Tarantola, S., Saltelli, A., 2000. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 81, 71-79.
23. Davis, T.J., Keller, C.P., 1997. Modelling and visualizing multiple spatial uncertainties. Comput. Geosci. 23, 397-408.
24. Davis, T.J., Keller, C.P., 1997. Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: Slope stability prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 11, 409-434.
25. Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V., 1997. Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 582 pp.
26. De Genst, W., Canters, F., Jacquet, W., Vermeersch, S., 1999. Development of a technique to decompose heterogeneous mapping units in a categorical map of the biotic environment using correlated categorical data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13, 591-614.
27. Doganaksoy, N., Schmee, J., 1993. Comparisons of approximate confidence intervals for distributions used in life analysis. Technometrics 35, 175-184.
28. Draper, D., 1995. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Med. 57, 45-97.
29. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London, 436 pp.
30. Elith, J., Burgman, M.A., 2002. Habitat models for PVA. In: Brigham, C.A., Schwartz, M.W. (Eds.), Population Viability in Plants. Springer-Verlag, in press.
31. Elston, D.A., Buckland, S.T., 1993. Statistical modelling of regional GIS data: An overview. Ecol. Model. 67, 81-102.
32. Ehlschlaeger, C.R., Shortridge, A.M., Goodchild, M.F., 1997. Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation. Comput. Geosci. 23, 387-395.
33. Evans, B.J., 1997. Dynamic display of spatial data reliability: Does it benefit the map user? Comput. Geosci. 23, 409-422.
34. Ferrier, S., Pressey, R.L., Barrett, T.W., 2000. A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biol. Conserv. 93, 303-325.
35. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F., 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24, 38-49.
36. Fine, K., 1975. Vagueness truth and logic. Synthese 30, 265-300.
37. Fisher, P.F., 1991. First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: The accuracy of the viewshed area. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 57, 1321-1327.
38. Fisher, P.F., Abrahart, R.J., Herbinger, W., 1997. The sensitivity of two distributed non-point source pollution models to the spatial arrangement of the landscape. Hydrol. Process. 11, 241-252.
39. Fox, J.C., Ades, P.A., Burgman, M.A., 2002. Autocorrelation and binary ecological models. Ecol. Model., submitted for publication.
40. Freitag, S., Nicholls, A.O., Van Jaarsveld, A.S., 1996. Nature reserve selection in the Transvaal, South Africa: What data should we be using? Biodivers. Conserv. 5, 685-698.
41. Goodchild, M.F., Buttenfield, B., Wood, J., 1994. Introduction to visualizing data validity. In: Hearnshaw, H.M., Unwin, D.J. (Eds.), Visualization in Geographic Information Systems. Wiley, New York, pp. 158-167.
42. Goovaerts, P., 2001. Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 103, 3-26.
43. Guisan, A., Zimmerman, N.E., 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135, 147-186.
44. Guisan, A., Edwards Jr, T.C., Hastie, T., 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models of species distributions: Setting the scene. Ecol. Model. 157, 89-100.
45. Hall, P., 1992. The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer-Verlag, New York, 352 pp.
46. Hammersley, J.M., Handscomb, D.C., 1964. Monte Carlo Methods. Methuen & Co, London, 178 pp.
47. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J., 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29-36.
48. Harrell, F.E., 2001. Regression Modeling Strategies with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis. Springer Verlag, New York, 568 pp.
49. Harrell, F.E., Lee, K.L., Mark, D.B., 1996. Multivariate prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat. Med. 15, 361-387.
50. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer-Verlag, New York, 533 pp.
51. Hauck, W.W., 1983. A note on confidence bands for the logistic response curve. Am. Stat. 37, 158-160.
52. Hearnshaw, H.M., Unwin, D.J., 1994. Visualization in Geographical Information Systems. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 243 pp.
53. Heuvelink, G.B.M., 1998. Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS. Taylor and Francis, London, 127 pp.
54. Ho, C.H., Smith, E.I., 1997. Volcanic hazard assessment incorporating expert knowledge - Application to the Yucca mountain region, Nevada, USA. Math. Geol. 29, 616-627.
55. Holmes, K.W., Chadwick, O.A., Kyriakidis, P.C., 2000. Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling. J. Hydrol. 233, 154-173.
56. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., 1995. Confidence interval estimates of an index of quality performance based on logistic regression models. Stat. Med. 14, 2161-2172.
57. Huber, P.J., 1967. The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics, pp. 221-233.
58. Hunter, G.J., Qiu, J., Goodchild, M.F., 1999. Application of a new model of vector data uncertainty. In: Lowell, K., Jaton, A. (Eds.), Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Resources. Third International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, pp. 203-208.
59. Jarvis, A.M., Robertson, A., 1999. Predicting population sizes and priority conservation areas for 10 endemic Namibian bird species. Biol. Conserv. 88, 121-131.
60. Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., Muller, K.E., Nizam, A., 1998. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, 3rd Ed.: Duxbury Press, California, 798 pp.
61. Legendre, P., 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74, 1659-1673.
62. Lindenmayer, D.B., Ritman, K., Cunningham, R.B., Smith, J.D.B., Horvath, D., 1995. A method for predicting the spatial distribution of arboreal marsupials. Wildlife Res. 22, 445-456.
63. Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B., Donnelly, C.F., Incoll, R.D., Pope, M.L., Tribolet, C.R., Viggers, K.L., Welsh, A.H., 2001. How effective is spotlighting for detecting the greater glider (Petauroides volans)? Wildlife Res. 28, 106-109.
64. Lodwick, W.A., Monson, W., Svoboda, L., 1990. Attribute error and sensitivity analysis of map operations in geographical information systems: Suitability analysis. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sys. 4, 413-428.
65. Lynn, H., Mohler, C.L., DeGloria, S.D., McCulloch, C.E., 1995. Error assessment in decision - Tree models applied to vegetation analysis. Landscape Ecol. 10, 323-335.
66. Madigan, D., Raftery, A.E., 1994. Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam's window. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 1535-1546.
67. Madigan, D., York, J., 1995. Bayesian graphical methods for discrete data. Int. Stat. Rev. 63, 215-232.
68. Manel, S., Ceri Williams, H., Ormerod, S.J., 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: The need to account for prevalence. J. Appl. Ecol. 38, 921-931.
69. Manly, B.F.G., 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd Ed.. Chapman and Hall, London, 399 pp.
70. McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A., 1989. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Ed.. Chapman and Hall, London, 261 pp.
71. McIntosh, R.P., 1967. The continuum concept of vegetation. Bot. Rev. 33, 130-187.
72. McKenney, D.W., Mackey, B.G., Zavitz, B.L., 1999. Calibration and sensitivity analysis of a spatially distributed solar radiation model. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sys. 13, 49-65.
73. Meyer, B., Printzen, C., 2000. Proposal for a standardized nomenclature and characterization of insoluble lichen pigments. Lichenologist 32, 571-583.
74. Miller, A.J., 1990. Subset Selection in Regression. Chapman and Hall, London, 229 pp.
75. Miller, A.J., 1995. Discussion of the paper by Chatfield: Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Star. 158, 460.
76. NSW NPWS, 1998. Eden Fauna Modeling - A Report Undertaken for the NSW CRA/RFA Steering Committee Project Number NE 24/EH, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service; Canberra.
77. Pausas, J.G., Braithwaite, L.W., Austin, M.P., 1995. Modelling habitat quality for arboreal marsupials in the south coastal forests of New South Wales, Australia. Forest Ecol. Manage. 78, 39-49.
78. Pearce, J., Ferrier, S., 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 133, 225-245.
79. Possingham, H.P., Lindenmayer, D.B., Norton, T.W., 1993. A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on population viability analysis. Pacific Conserv. Biol. 1, 39-45.
80. Raftery, A.E., Madigan, D., Hoeting, J.A., 1997. Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92, 179-191.
81. Regan, H.M., Colyvan, M., Burgman, M.A., 2000. A proposal for fuzzy IUCN categories and criteria. Biol. Conserv. 92, 101-108.
82. Regan, H.M., Colyvan, M., Burgman, M.A., 2002. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Appl. 12, 618-628.
83. Roberts, D.W., 1996. Landscape vegetation modelling with vital attributes and fuzzy systems theory. Ecol. Model. 90, 175-184.
84. Steyerberg, E.W., Eijkemans, M.J.C., Habbema, J.D.F., 1999. Stepwise selection in small data sets: A simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52, 935-942.
85. Stoms, D.M., Davis, F.W., Crogan, C.B., 1992. Sensitivity of wildlife habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 58, 843-850.
86. Thorsen, M., Refsgaard, J.C., Hansen, S., Pebesma, E., Jensen, J.B., Kleeschulte, S., 2001. Assessment of uncertainty in simulation of nitrate leaching to aquifers at catchment scale. J. Hydrol. 242, 210-227.
87. Van der Wel, F.J.M., Vandergaag, L.C., Gorte, B.G.H., 1998. Visual exploration of uncertainty in remote-sensing classification. Comput. Geosci. 24, 335-343.
88. Van Horne, B., 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildlife Manag. 47, 893-901.
89. van Horssen, P.W., Schot, P.P., Barendregt, A., 1999. A GIS-based plant prediction model for wetland ecosystems. Landscape Ecol. 14, 253-265.
90. Whittaker, R.H., 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 49, 207-264.
91. Wintle, B.A., Burgman, M.A., Kavanagh, R.P, 2002a. The Magnitude and Management Consequences of False Negative Observations in Surveys of Arboreal Marsupials and Large Forest Owls, in preparation.
92. Wintle, B.A., McCarthy, M.A., Kavanagh, R.P., Burgman, M.A., 2002b. The use of Bayesian model averaging to better represent uncertainty in predictions derived from ecological models. Conserv. Biol., submitted for publication.
93. Yanez, M., Floater, G., 2000. Spatial distribution and habitat preference of the endangered tarantula, Brachypelma klaasi (Araneae: Theraphosidae) in Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 9, 795-810.
94. Zweig, M.H., Campbell, G., 1992. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 39, 561-577.