The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions

Research Policy

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2019, Pages

  Edmondson, Duncan L ^a   Kern, Florian ^a   Rogge, Karoline S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Policy feedback; Policy mix; Policy processes; Socio technical system; Sustainability transitions

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; FEEDBACK CONTROL; PUBLIC POLICY;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; FEEDBACK MECHANISMS; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; POLICY PROCESS; SOCIO-TECHNICAL CHANGES; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITION;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85044536576     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M.P., Negro, S.O., Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes?. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 1:1 (2011), 125–129.
2. Arnold, A.D., The Logic of Congressional Action. 1990, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
3. Arrow, K.J., ‘Increasing returns: historiographic issues and path dependence’. Eur. J. Hist. Econ. Thought 7:1 (2000), 171–180.
4. Avelino, F., Rotmans, J., Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 12:4 (2009), 543–569.
5. Avelino, F., Power in Transition. Empowering Discourses on Sustainability Transitions. 2011, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
6. Baker, L., Newell, P., Phillips, J., The political economy of energy transitions: the case of South Africa. New Polit. Econ. 19:6 (2014), 791–818, 10.1080/13563467.2013.849674.
7. Baranzini, A., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Carattini, S., Howarth, R.B., Padilla, E., Roca, J., Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. WIREs Clim. Change, 8, 2017, e462, 10.1002/wcc.462.
8. Béland, D., Reconsidering policy feedback: how policies affect politics. Adm. Soc. 42:5 (2010), 568–590.
9. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A., Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Res. Policy 37 (2008), 407–429.
10. Borrás, S., Edquist, C., The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 80 (2013), 1513–1522.
11. Borras, policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies. Sci. Pub. Policy 38 (2011), 725–734.
12. Building, Top 20 housebuilders 2016. Building, 2016 article http://www.building.co.uk/top-20-housebuilders-2016/5082787.
13. Cairney, P., Heikkila, T., Comparing theoretical approaches. chapter 10. Paul Sabatier, A., Christopher Weible, M., (eds.) Theories of the Policy Process, third edition, 2014, Westview Press, Boulder ISBN: 9780813349268.
14. Campbell, A.L., Policy makes mass politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 15:1 (2012), 333–351.
15. David, M., Moving beyond the heuristic of creative destruction: targeting exnovation with policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33:January (2017), 138–146, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.023.
16. del Río González, P., The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes: an overview of the literature. Mitigat. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change 12 (2006), 1363–1390.
17. del Río González, P., Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: the impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 4978–4989.
18. DCLG, Definition of Zero Carbon Homes and Non-domestic Buildings − Consultation. 2008, H.M. Government, London.
19. ENDS report, On the Road to Zero- Carbon Developments. Analysis. The Ends Report., 2006 http://www.endsreport.com/article/16427/on-the-road-to-zero-carbon-developments.
20. ENDSreport, Home Energy Efficiency Still in the Doldrums. The Ends Report., 2013 http://www.endsreport.com/article/38131/home-energy-efficiency-still-in-the-doldrums.
21. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M., Reconceptualising the policy mix for innovation. Res. Policy 40:5 (2011), 702–713.
22. Foxon, T.J., Pearson, P.J.G., Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J. Clean. Prod. 16 (2008), 148–161.
23. Foxon, T.J., Gross, R., Chase, A., Howes, J., Arnall, A., Anderson, D., UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures. Energy Policy 33:16 (2005), 2123–2137.
24. Foxon, T.J., A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecol. Econ. 70:12 (2011), 2258–2267, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.014.
25. Geels, F.W., Schot, J., Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 36:3 (2007), 399–417.
26. Geels, Frank W., Schot, Johan, The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective. Grin, John, Rotmans, Jan, Schot, Johan, (eds.) Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, 2010, Routledge, 11–104 ISBN 9780415876759.
27. Geels, F.W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Wassermann, S., The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Res. Policy 45:4 (2016), 896–913.
28. Geels, F.W., Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31:8–9 (2002), 1257–1274.
29. Geels, F.W., From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 33:6–7 (2004), 897–920.
30. Geels, F.W., Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 72:6 SPEC. ISS (2005), 681–696.
31. Geels, F.W., Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult. Soc., 2014, 10.1177/0263276414531627 (May 2013), 0263276414531627.
32. Gibbs, D., O'Neill, K., Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum 59 (2015), 133–141, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.004.
33. Gould, S.J., Eldredge, N., Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:2 (1977), 115–151.
34. Greenwood, D., The challenge of policy coordination for sustainable sociotechnical transitions: the case of the zero-carbon homes agenda in England. Environ. Plann. C: Gov. Policy 30:1 (2012), 162–179.
35. Greenwood, D., In search of Green political economy: steering markets, innovation, and the zero carbon homes agenda in England. Environ. Polit. 24:3 (2015), 423–441.
36. Guerzoni, M., Raiteri, E., Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Res. Policy 44:3 (2015), 726–747, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009.
37. HM Government, The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan. 2009, TSO, Norwich https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228752/9780108508394. pdf.
38. Hafeneth, T., Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsides for a Cleaner Future. 2017, The World Bank http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2017/11/21/reforming-fossil-fuel-subsidies-for-a-cleaner-future.
39. Heffernan, E., Pan, W., Liang, X., De Wilde, P., Zero Carbon Homes: Perceptions from the UK Construction Industry. 2015.
40. Hekkert, M.P., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., Smits, R.E.H.M., Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 74:4 (2007), 413–432.
41. Hess, D.J., Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective. Res. Policy 43:2 (2014), 278–283.
42. Hess, D.J., The politics of niche-regime conflicts: distributed solar energy in the United States. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 2015, 1–9.
43. Hoppmann, J., Huenteler, J., Girod, B., Compulsive policy-making − The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power. Res. Policy 43:8 (2014), 1422–1441.
44. Howlett, M., Rayner, J., Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in new governance arrangements. Policy Soc. 26:4 (2007), 1–18.
45. Howlett, M., Rayner, J., Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: complementary effects, goodness of fit, degrees of freedom, and feasibility in policy portfolio design. Polit. Gov. 1:December (2013), 170–182.
46. Howlett, M., Vince, J., Del Río, P., Policy integration and multi-level governance: dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Polit. Gov., 5(2), 2017, 69, 10.17645/pag.v5i2.928.
47. Jacobs, A.M., Weaver, R.K., When policies undo themselves: self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance 28:4 (2015), 441–457.
48. Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 1:1 (2011), 41–57.
49. Jacobsson, S., Lauber, V., The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34:3 (2006), 256–276.
50. Johnstone, P., Stirling, A., Sovacool, B., Policy mixes for incumbency: exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas fracking, and nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33:August (2017), 147–162, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.005.
51. Jordan, A., Matt, E., Designing policies that intentionally stick: policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sci. 47:3 (2014), 227–247.
52. Jordan, G., Halpin, D., Maloney, W., Defining interests: disambiguation and the need for new distinctions?. Br. J. Polit. Int. Relat. 6:2 (2004), 195–212.
53. Kemp, R., Pontoglio, S., The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments − a typical case of the blind men and the elephant?. Ecol. Econ. 72 (2011), 28–36.
54. Kemp, R., Rotmans, J., Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K., (eds.) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability, Theory, Evidence and Policy, 2004, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 137–167.
55. Kemp, R., Environmental Policy and Technical Change. 1997, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Brookfield.
56. Kern, F., Howlett, M., Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sci. 42:4 (2009), 391–408.
57. Kern, F., Rogge, K.S., The pace of governed energy transitions: agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes?. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22 (2016), 13–17.
58. Kern, F., Rogge, K.S., Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: a critical survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 2017, 0–1, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.001.
59. Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., Policy packaging or policy patching?: The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 23 (2017), 11–25.
60. Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 23 (2017), 11–25.
61. Kern, F., Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering system innovations towards sustainability. Environ. Plann. C: Gov. Policy 29:6 (2011), 1116–1134.
62. Kivimaa, P., Kern, F., Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 45:1 (2016), 205–217.
63. Lauber, V., Jacobsson, S., The politics and economics of constructing: contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables −the case of the German Renewable Energy Act. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 18 (2016), 147–163.
64. Lehmann, P., Using a Policy Mix to Combat Climate Change − An Economic Evaluation of Policies in the German Electricity Sector., 2010, Universität Halle- Wittenberg (PhD thesis).
65. Loorbach, D., Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23:1 (2010), 161–183.
66. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B., Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 955–967.
67. Markard, J., Suter, M., Ingold, K., Energy transition and policy change − Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. IST Conference, October, 2014, 1–31.
68. Markard, J., Suter, M., Ingold, K., Socio-technical transitions and policy change − advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 18 (2015), 215–237.
69. May, P.J., Jochim, A.E., Policy Regime Perspectives: Policies, Politics, and Governing, 41, 2013, 426–452.
70. Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., Caching the Carbon. The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage. 2009, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton.
71. Meadowcroft, J., What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci. 42:4 (2009), 323–340.
72. Meadowcroft, J., Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 1:1 (2011), 70–75.
73. Meckling, J., Sterner, T., Wagner, G., Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nat. Energy 2:12 (2017), 918–922, 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8.
74. Mettler, S., Soss, J., The consequences of public policy for democratic citizen- ship: bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspect. Polit. 2 (2004), 55–73.
75. Mettler, S., Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:02 (2002), 351–365.
76. Mourik, R., Raven, R., A Practioner’ S View on Strategic Niche Management Towards a Future Research Outline. 2006 (December) 37.
77. Nauwelaers, C., Boekholk, P., Mostert, B., Cunningham, P., Guy, K., Hofer, R., Rammer, C., Policy Mixes for R&D in Europe. 2009, European Commission −Directorate −General for Research, Maastricht.
78. Normann, H.E., The role of politics in sustainable transitions: the rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 15 (2015), 180–193.
79. Normann, H.E., Policy networks in energy transitions: the cases of carbon capture and storage and offshore wind in Norway. Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 2017.
80. Oberlander, J., Weaver, R.K., Unraveling from within? the affordable care act and self-Undermining policy feedbacks. Forum 13:1 (2015), 37–62.
81. Osmani, M., O'Reilly, A., Feasibility of zero carbon homes in England by: A house builder's perspective. Build. Environ. 44:9 (2009), 1917–1924.
82. Ossenbrink, J., Finnsson, S., Bening, C. R., Hoffmann, V. H. (Submitted to Research Policy). Delineating policy mixes −contrasting the top down and bottom up approach along the case of energy storage in California.
83. Patashnik, E., Zelizer, J., When policy does not remake politics: the limits of policy feedback. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada, 2009, 1–39.
84. Patashnik, E.M., Zelizer, J.E., The struggle to remake politics: liberal reform and the limits of policy feedback in the contemporary american state. Perspect. Polit. 11:4 (2013), 1071–1087.
85. Pierson, P., Policy feedback and policy change. World Polit. 45:4 (1993), 595–628.
86. Pierson, P., Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:2 (2000), 251–267.
87. Pierson, P., Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. 2004, Princeton University Press.
88. Pierson, P., The costs of marginalization qualitative methods in the study of american politics. Comparat. Polit. Stud. 40:2 (2007), 146–169.
89. Podewils, C., Records with Renewables, but Once Again No Progress on CO2 Emissions −2017 Was a Year of Mixed Success for the Energy Transition. 2018, Agora-Energiewende https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/topics/-agothem-/Produkt/produkt/464/Gemischte+Energiewende-Bilanz+2017%3A+Rekorde+bei+Erneuerbaren+Energien%2C+aber+erneut+keinerlei+Fortschritte+beim+Klimaschutz/.
90. Quitzow, R., Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India's National Solar Mission. Res. Policy 44 (2015), 233–243.
91. Quitzow, R., Dynamics of a policy-driven market: the co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 17 (2015), 126–148.
92. Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., Smith, A., Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 18 (2016), 164–180, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002.
93. Reichardt, K., Rogge, K., How the policy mix impacts innovation: findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 18 (2016), 62–81, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.001.
94. Reichardt, K., Negro, S.O., Rogge, K.S., Hekkert, M.P., Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 106 (2016), 11–21.
95. Reichardt, K., Rogge, K.S., Negro, S.O., Unpacking policy processes for addressing systemic problems in technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80 (2017), 1217–1226.
96. Rogge, K.S., Dütschke, E., Exploring perceptions of the credibility of policy mixes: the case of German manufacturers of renewable power generation technologies. SPRU Working Paper Series (SWPS) 23 (2017), 1–53.
97. Rogge, K.S., Johnstone, P., Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: the case of the German Energiewende. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33:February (2017), 128–137, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.004.
98. Rogge, K.S., Reichardt, K., Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Res. Policy 45:8 (2016), 1620–1635.
99. Rogge, K., Schleich, J., Do Policy Mix Characteristics Matter for Low-Carbon Innovation? A Survey-Based Exploration for Renewable Power Generation Technologies in Germany. Accepted in Research Policy, 2018.
100. Rogge, K.S., Kern, F., Howlett, M., Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33:October (2017), 1–10, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025.
101. Rosenow, J., The politics of the german CO2-Building rehabilitation programme. Energy Effic. 6:2 (2013), 219–238.
102. Rotmans, J., Loorbach, D., Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance. A systemic and reflexive approach. Transitions to Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, 2010, Routledge, 105–198.
103. Sabatier, P.A., Weible, C.M., Theories of the Policy Process. third edition, 2014, Westview Press, Boulder ISBN: 978081334926829.
104. Schmidt, T.S., Sewerin, S., Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nat. Energy, 2(6), 2017, 17084, 10.1038/nenergy.2017.84.
105. Schneider, A., Ingram, H., What is next for policy design and social construction theory?. Policy Stud. J. 37:1 (2009), 103–119.
106. Schweber, L., Lees, T., Torriti, J., Schweber, L., Lees, T., Framing evidence: policy design for the zero-carbon home. Build. Res. Inf. 3218:February (2015), 37–41.
107. Scrase, I., Smith, A., The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions. Environ. Polit. 18 (2009), 707–726.
108. Seager, A., Construction Sector Rises to Challenge of Building Eco-friendly Homes of the Future. 2007, The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/feb/28/communities.society.
109. Shove, E., Walker, G., CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environ. Plann. A 39:4 (2007), 763–770.
110. Skocpol, T., Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. 1992, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
111. Skogstad, G., Policy Feedback and Self-reinforcing and Self- Undermining Processes in EU Biofuels Policy. 2016 1763 (March).
112. Smith, A., Raven, R., What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 1025–1036.
113. Smith, A., Kern, F., Raven, R., Verhees, B., Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 81 (2014), 115–130.
114. Sovacool, B.K., How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13 (2016), 202–215, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020.
115. Stenzel, T., Frenzel, A., Regulating technological change −the strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets. Energy Policy 36:7 (2008), 2645–2657.
116. Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B., van Vuuren, D., Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environ. Change 35 (2015), 239–253.
117. UK-GBC, Over 200 Businesses Urge Chancellor to Reconsider Scrapping Zero Carbon. 2015, UK-GBC News http://www.ukgbc.org/news/over-200-businesses-urge-chancellor-reconsider-scrapping-zero-carbon.
118. UK-GBC, Open Letter to George Osborne on Zero Carbon Policy [open Letter]. Constructing Excellence. 2015 Retrieved from http://constructingexcellence.org.uk/open-letter-to-george-osborne-on-zero-carbon-policy/.
119. Unruh, G.C., Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28 (2000), 817–830.
120. Weaver, K., Paths and forks or chutes and ladders?: negative feedbacks and policy regime change. J. Publ. Policy 30:2 (2010), 137–162.
121. Weber, K.M., Rohracher, H., Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive failures framework. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 1037–1047.
122. Weible, C.M., Introducing the scope and focus of policy process research and theory. Chapter 1. Sabatier, Paul A., Weible, Christopher M., (eds.) Theories of the Policy Process, third edition, 2014, Westview Press, Boulder ISBN: 9780813349268.
123. White, W., Lunnan, A., Nybakk, E., Kulisic, B., The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency. Biomass Bioenergy 57 (2013), 97–105.
124. Wieczorek, A.J., Hekkert, M.P., Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Sci. Publ. Policy 39:1 (2012), 74–87, 10.1093/scipol/scr008.
125. Wolsink, M., Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of backyard motives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11:6 (2007), 1188–1207.