Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate

Policy Sciences

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 227-247

  Jordan, Andrew ^a   Matt, Elah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Path dependence; Policy design; Policy feedback; Policy instruments

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; POLICY MAKING; POLICY REFORM;

EID: 84906084931     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-014-9201-x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Bardach, E. (2006). Policy Dynamics. In M. Moran, et al. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 336-366). Oxford: OUP.
3. Baumgartner, F. (2012). Ideas and policy change. Governance, 26(2), 239-258.
4. Béland, D. (2010). Reconsidering policy feedback. Administration and Society, 42(5), 568-590.
5. Bongaerts, J. (1999) Carbon dioxide emissions and the ACEA agreement. European Environmental Law Review, 8(4), 101-104.
6. Campbell, A. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351.
7. Carlson, A., & Fri, R. (2013). Designing a durable energy policy. Daedalus, 142(1), 119-128.
8. Daugbjerg, C. (2003). Policy feedback and paradigm shift in EU agricultural policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 421-437.
9. Eberlein, B. (2012). Inching towards a common energy policy. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a policy making state? (pp. 147-169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Eckstein, H. (1975) Case study and theory in political science. In: F. Greenstein, N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (pp. 79-138). Reading: Addison Wesley.
11. Eskridge, W., & Firejohn, J. (2001). Super statutes. Duke Law Journal, 50, 1215-1275.
12. Glazer, A., & Rothenberg, L. (2001). Why government succeeds and why it fails. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
13. Goodin, R. (1996). Institutions and their design. In R. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 1-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gunningham, N., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart regulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Hacker, J. (2002). The divided welfare state. Yale: Yale University Press.
16. Haigh, N. (2009). Manual of environmental policy. Leeds: Maney Publishing.
17. Hovi, J., et al. (2009). Implementing long term climate policy. Global Environmental Politics, 9(3), 20-39.
18. Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies. London: Routledge.
19. Howlett, M. (2014). From the 'old' to the 'new' policy design. Policy Sciences (in press).
20. Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in policy research. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 33-46.
21. Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. (2013). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration and Society, 45(3), 357-381.
22. Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. (1990). Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes. Journal of Public Policy, 10(1), 67-88.
23. Jacobs, A. (2010). Policy making as political constraint. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change (pp. 94-131). Cambridge: CUP.
24. Jacobs, A. (2011). Governing for the long term. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jacobs, A., & Weaver, K. (2012). Negative feedback, policy coalitions. Mimeo: And Policy Change.
26. Jenkins, J., & Patashnik, E. (Eds.). (2012). Living legislation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Jervis, R. (1997). System effects. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Jordan, A. J., Bauer, M., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2013). Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), 795-805.
29. Jordan, A. J., Benson, D., Wurzel, R., et al. (2012). Environmental policy. In J. J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a policy state? (pp. 104-124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of 'new' policy instruments in comparative perspective. Political Studies, 53(3), 477-496.
32. Kay, A. (2005). A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Administration, 83(3), 553-571.
33. Keating, D. (2013a). Member states assess German damage to institutional trust. European Voice, 17 October, p. 4-5.
34. Keating, D. (2013b). Emissions trading in crisis after MEPs reject remedy. European Voice, 18-24 April, p. 1.
35. Keay-Bright, S. (2000). A critical analysis of the voluntary fuel economy agreement. Brussels: EEB.
36. Kemp, R., & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of new environmental policy instruments. Ecological Economics, 72, 28-36.
37. Lazarus, R. (2009). Super-wicked problems and climate change. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153-1233.
38. Levin, K., et al. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems. Policy Sciences, 45, 123-152.
39. Matt, E. (2012) The political economy of EU environmental governance. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
40. May, P., & Jochim, A. (2013). Policy regime perspectives. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426-452.
41. Meadowcroft, J. (2011). What about the politics? Policy Sciences, 42, 324-340.
42. Mettler, S. (2011). The submerged state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55-73.
44. Oberthur, S., & Ott, H. (1999). The Koto protocol. Berlin: Springer.
45. Oosterhuis, F. (Ed) (2006). Innovation dynamics induced by environmental policy, IVM report E-07/05, November 2006, IVM, Amsterdam.
46. Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2002). The study of American Political Development. In: I. Katznelson, H. Milner (Eds.), Political science (pp. 722-754). New York: WW Norton and Company.
47. Parson, E., & Karwat, D. (2011). Sequential climate change policy. WIRES Climate Change, 2, 744-756.
48. Patashnik, P. (2008). Reforms at risk. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Patashnik, E., & Zelizer, J. (2010) When policy does not remake politics. In Paper presented at the Republic of Statutes Conference, Yale Law School, 10-11 December 2010.
50. Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. (2005). The politics of path dependency. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1275-1300.
51. Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause. World Politics, 45, 595-628.
52. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design. Governance, 13(4), 475-499.
54. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55. Pierson, P. (2005). Public policies as institutions. In I. Shapiro, et al. (Eds.), Rethinking political institutions (pp. 114-131). New York: New York University Press.
56. Pierson, P. (2006). Public policies as institutions. In S. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, & D. Galvin (Eds.), Rethinking political institutions (pp. 114-134). New York: New York University Press.
57. Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In: I. Katznelson, H. Milner (Eds.), Political science: the state of the discipline (pp. 693-721). New York: WW Norton and Company.
58. Rennings, K., Brockman, K.-L., & Bergman, H. (1997). Voluntary agreements in environmental protection (pp. 97-104). No: ZEW Discussion Papers.
59. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In: S. Rayner, E. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change, Vol. II (pp. 327-367). Columbus, Ohio: Batelle Press.
60. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy-coalition framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117-166). Bounder: Westview Press.
61. Salamon, L. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action. In L. Salamon (Ed.), Tools of government (pp. 1-47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Schneider, A., Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
63. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103-119.
64. Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Skodvin, T., et al. (2010). Target group influence and political feasibility. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 854-873.
66. Soss, J., & Schram, S. (2007). A public transformed? American Political Science Review, 101(1), 111-127.
67. ten Brink, P. (2010). Mitigating CO2 emissions from cars in the EU. In S. Oberthür & M. Pallemaerts (Eds.), The new climate policies of the EU (pp. 179-210). Brussels: VUB Press.
68. Thelen, K. (2003). How institutionalism evolves. In J. Mahoney & D. Reuschemeyer (Eds.), Historical institutionalism in comparative politics (pp. 208-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. van Renssen, S. (2011). A biofuel conundrum. Nature Climate Change, 1, 389-390.
70. Weaver, R. K. (2010). Paths and forks, or chutes and ladders? Journal of Public Policy, 30(2), 137-162.
71. Weaver, R. K., & Rockman, B. (1993). Do institutions matter?. Washington: The Brooking Institute.
72. Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. In J. Q. Wilson (Ed.), The politics of regulation (pp. 357-394). New York: Basic Books.
73. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
74. Wurzel, R. K. W. (2002). Environmental policy making in Britain, Germany and the EU. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
75. Wurzel, R., Zito, A., & Jordan, A. (2013). Environmental governance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.