Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany

Research Policy

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 1639-1654

  Rogge, Karoline S ^a,b   Schleich, Joachim ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^c GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

^d VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coherence; Comprehensiveness; Consistency; Credibility; Decarbonization; Eco innovation; Policy mix; Renewable energy; Sustainability transition

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COHERENT LIGHT; DECARBONIZATION;

COMPREHENSIVENESS; CONSISTENCY; CREDIBILITY; ECO-INNOVATION; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITION;

SURVEYS;

EID: 85047910449     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Ashoff, G., Enhancing Policy Coherence for Development: Justification, Recognition and Approaches to Achievement. DIE Studies 11. 2005, German Development Institute, Bonn.
2. Barney, J., Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. J. Manage. 27:6 (2001), 643–650.
3. Barslund, M.C., MVTOBIT: Stata Module to Calculate Mulitvariate Tobit Models by Simulated Maximum Likelihood (SML). 2009 http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s456875.
4. Bergek, A., Berggren, C., The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: a review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecol. Econ. 106 (2014), 112–123.
5. BMWi, Act on the Development of Renewable Energy Sources (Renewable Energy Sources Act - RES Act 2014. 2014, EEG.
6. BMWi, The Energy of the Future - Fourth “Energy Transition” Monitoring Report - Summary: A Good Piece of Work., 2015, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Berlin.
7. BMWi, 10-Point Agenda: A Clear Roadmap for the Energy Transition. downloaded on 27 June 2017 from, 2016, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy http://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Dossier/energy-transition.html).
8. BMWi, Bundesbericht Energieforschung 2016: Forschungsförderung für die Energiewende. 2016, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Berlin.
9. BMWi, BMU, Energy Concept for an Environmentally Sound, Reliable and Affordable Energy Supply. 2010, Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Berlin.
10. Borghesi, S., Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Res. Policy 44:3 (2015), 669–683.
11. Bosetti, V., Victor, D.G., Politics and economics of second-best regulation of greenhouse gases: the importance of regulatory credibility. Energy J. 32:1 (2011), 1–24.
12. Bouckaert, G., Peters, B.G., Verhoest, K., The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations, Shifting Patterns of Public Management. 2010, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
13. Bruns, E., Ohlhorst, D., Wenzel, B., Köppel, J., Renewable Energies in Germany'S Electricity Market: A Biography of the Innovation Process. 2011, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht.
14. Cai, W.-g., Zhou, X.-l., On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 79 (2014), 239–248.
15. Cantner, U., Graf, H., Herrmann, J., Kalthaus, M., Inventor networks in renewable energies: the influence of the policy mix in Germany. Res. Policy 45:6 (2016), 1165–1184.
16. Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Martini, C., Pennacchio, L., Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: the case of the biofuels sector. Res. Policy 44:3 (2015), 577–595.
17. Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Palma, A., Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: a patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Res. Policy 46:4 (2017), 799–819.
18. Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., Does foreign environmental policy influence domestic innovation?: Evidence from the wind industry. Environ. Resour. Econ. 58:3 (2014), 391–413.
19. del Río, P., The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: a research agenda. Ecol. Econ. 68:3 (2009), 861–878.
20. del Río, P., Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Könnölä T., Bleda, M., Resources, capabilities and competences for eco-innovation. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 22:2 (2015), 274–292.
21. del Río, P., Peñasco, C., Romero-Jordán, D., What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016), 2158–2170.
22. Demirel, P., Kesidou, E., Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: government policies and firm motivations. Ecol. Econ. 70:8 (2011), 1546–1557.
23. Den Hertog, L., Stroß S., Policy Coherence in the EU System: Concepts and Legal Rooting of an Ambiguous Term. Paper Presented at the Conference “The EU as Global Player” 7–8 April 2011. 2011, University Institute for European Studies, Madrid.
24. Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., Verona, G., Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: current findings and future research directions. Res. Policy 41:8 (2012), 1283–1295.
25. Anadon, L.D., Bunn, M., Narayanamurti, V., (eds.) Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation, 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York.
26. Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., Sáez-Martínez, F.J., Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review. Innov.: Manag. Policy Pract. 17:1 (2015), 6–23.
27. Doblinger, C., Dowling, M., Helm, R., An institutional perspective of public policy and network effects in the renewable energy industry: enablers or disablers of entrepreneurial behaviour and innovation?. Entrepren. Region. Dev. 28:1–2 (2015), 126–156.
28. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M., Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Res. Policy 40:5 (2011), 702–713.
29. Frondel, M., Horbach, J., Rennings, K., What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecol. Econ. 66:1 (2008), 153–160.
30. Gallagher, K.S., Grübler, A., Kuhl, L., Nemet, G., Wilson, C., The energy technology innovation system. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:1 (2012), 137–162.
31. Gawel, E., Strunz, S., Lehmann, P., Germany's energy transition under attack: Is there an inscrutable German Sonderweg?. Nat. Cult. 8:2 (2013), 121–133.
32. Geels, F.W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M., Wassermann, S., The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Res. Policy 45:4 (2016), 896–913.
33. Ghisetti, C., Pontoni, F., Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 118 (2015), 57–66.
34. Grau, T., Responsive feed-in tariff adjustment to dynamic technology development. Energy Econ. 44 (2014), 36–46.
35. Greene, W.H., Econometric Analysis. 2012, Pearson, Boston, London.
36. Guerría, A., From negotiations to implementation: strengthening global responses to climate change. UNFCCC, (eds.) G7 Climate Change: The New Economy. World News - CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, The New Economy, London, 34–37.
37. Guerzoni, M., Raiteri, E., Demand-side vs. Supply-side technology policies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Res. Policy 44:3 (2015), 726–747.
38. Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. 2007, Blackwell Publications, Oxford, Cambridge.
39. Helm, D., Credible carbon policy. Oxf. Rev. Economic Policy 19:3 (2003), 438–450.
40. Hermwille, L., The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11 (2016), 237–246.
41. Hoppmann, J., Peters, M., Schneider, M., Hoffmann, V.H., The two faces of market support—how deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Res. Policy 42:4 (2013), 989–1003.
42. Hoppmann, J., Huenteler, J., Girod, B., Compulsive policy-making—the evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power. Res. Policy 43:8 (2014), 1422–1441.
43. Horbach, J., Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res. Policy 37:1 (2008), 163–173.
44. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., Rennings, K., Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol. Econ. 78 (2012), 112–122.
45. Horbach, J., Oltra, V., Belin, J., Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations—An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the Community innovation survey. Ind. Innov. 20:6 (2013), 523–543.
46. Howlett, M., Rayner, J., Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design. Polit. Gov. 1:2 (2013), 170–182.
47. Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T.S., Ossenbrink, J., Hoffmann, V.H., Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 104 (2016), 102–121.
48. IEA, IRENA, Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System. 2017, International Energy Agency; International Renewable Energy Agency, Paris, Bonn.
49. IRENA, Renewable Energy Innovation Policy: Success Criteria and Strategies. 2013, International Renewable Energy Agency, Bonn.
50. Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind. Corp. Change 13:5 (2004), 815–849.
51. Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 1:1 (2011), 41–57.
52. Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., Stavins, R.N., Environmental policy and technological change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 22:1-2 (2002), 41–69.
53. Jänicke, M., Blazejczak, J., Edler, D., Hemmelskamp, J., Environmental policy and innovation: an International comparison of policy frameworks and innovation effects. Hemmelskamp, J., Rennings, K., Leone, F., (eds.) Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approach and Empirical Analysis., 2000, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 125–152.
54. Johnstone, N., (eds.) Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour, 2007, Elgar; OECD, Cheltenham, Paris.
55. Johnstone, N., Haščič I., Popp, D., Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45:1 (2010), 133–155.
56. Kammerer, D., The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Ecol. Econ. 68:8-9 (2009), 2285–2295.
57. Kang, S.B., Létourneau, P., Investors’ reaction to the government credibility problem: a real option analysis of emission permit policy risk. Energy Econ. 54 (2016), 96–107.
58. Kaplan, S., Tripsas, M., Thinking about technology: applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37:5 (2008), 790–805.
59. Kemp, R., Pearson, P., MEI D15 - Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation: Deliverable 15., 2007, UM-MERIT, Maastricht.
60. Kemp, R., Pontoglio, S., The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — a typical case of the blind men and the elephant?. Ecol. Econ. 72 (2011), 28–36.
61. Kern, F., Howlett, M., Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sci. 42:4 (2009), 391–408.
62. Kesidou, E., Demirel, P., On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res. Policy 41:5 (2012), 862–870.
63. Kungl, G., Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 8 (2015), 13–23.
64. Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C., Lockwood, M., Hoggett, R., Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany's energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 28 (2017), 58–67.
65. Lauber, V., Jacobsson, S., the politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables – the German renewable energy act. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 18 (2016), 147–163.
66. Magro, E., Navarro, M., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., Coordination-mix: the hidden face of STI. Policy. Rev. Policy Res. 31:5 (2014), 367–389.
67. Matthes, F.C., Energy transition in Germany: a case study on a policy-driven structural change of the energy system. Evolut. Inst. Econ. Rev. 14:1 (2017), 141–169.
68. Mowery, D., Rosenberg, N., The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res. Policy 8:2 (1979), 102–153.
69. Negro, S.O., Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M.P., Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly? A review of innovation system problems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:6 (2012), 3836–3846.
70. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. 1982, Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
71. Nemet, G.F., Braden, P., Cubero, E., Rimal, B., Four decades of multiyear targets in energy policy: aspirations or credible commitments?. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev.: Energy Environ. 3:5 (2014), 522–533.
72. Nemet, G.F., Jakob, M., Steckel, J.C., Edenhofer, O., Addressing policy credibility problems for low-carbon investment. Global Environ. Change 42 (2017), 47–57.
73. Nooteboom, B., A Cognitive Theory of the Firm: Learning. Governance and Dynamic Capabilities, 2009, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham,UK.
74. OECD, Building Policy Coherence: Tools and Tensions. PUMA Public Management Occasional Papers 12. 1996, OECD, Paris.
75. OECD, The DAC Guidelines Poverty Reduction. 2001, OECD, Paris.
76. OECD, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3rd edition, 2005, OECD, Paris.
77. OECD, Eco-Innovation in Industry - Enabling Green Growth. 2009, OECD, Paris.
78. OECD, Better Policies to Support Eco-Innovation. OECD Studies on Environmental Innovation. 2011, OECD, Paris.
79. OECD, System Innovation: Synthesis Report., 2015, OECD, Paris.
80. OECD/IEA/NEA/ITF, Aligning Policies for a Low-Carbon Economy. 2015, OECD, Paris 242 pp.
81. Pavitt, K., Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy 13:6 (1984), 343–373.
82. Pegels, A., Lütkenhorst, W., Is Germany׳s energy transition a case of successful green industrial policy? Contrasting wind and solar PV. Energy Policy 74 (2014), 522–534.
83. Peters, M., Schneider, M., Griesshaber, T., Hoffmann, V.H., The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – does the locus of policies matter?. Res. Policy 41:8 (2012), 1296–1308.
84. Quitzow, R., Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India's National Solar Mission. Res. Policy 44:1 (2015), 233–243.
85. Quitzow, R., Dynamics of a policy-driven market: the co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 17 (2015), 126–148.
86. Quitzow, L., Canzler, W., Grundmann, P., Leibenath, M., Moss, T., Rave, T., The German Energiewende – What's happening? Introducing the special issue. Util. Policy 41 (2016), 163–171.
87. Rammer, C., Schubert, T., Hünermund, P., Köhler, M., Iferd, Y., Peters, B., Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2015. Dokumentation 16-01. 2016, ZEW, Mannheim.
88. Reichardt, K., Rogge, K., How the policy mix impacts innovation: findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 18 (2016), 62–81.
89. Reichardt, K., Negro, S.O., Rogge, K.S., Hekkert, M.P., Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 106 (2016), 11–21.
90. Reichardt, K., Rogge, K.S., Negro, S.O., Unpacking policy processes for addressing systemic problems in technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80 (2017), 1217–1226.
91. Rennings, K., Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32:2 (2000), 319–332.
92. Rennings, K., Rammer, C., The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance. Ind. Innov. 18:3 (2011), 255–283.
93. Rexhäuser, S., Rammer, C., Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the porter hypothesis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 57:1 (2014), 145–167.
94. Richter, M., Business model innovation for sustainable energy: how German municipal utilities invest in offshore wind energy. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 63:1-2 (2013), 24–50.
95. Richter, M., German utilities and distributed PV: how to overcome barriers to business model innovation. Renew. Energy 55 (2013), 456–466.
96. Rogge, K.S., Innovationsaktivitäten von Herstellern erneuerbarer Stromerzeugungstechnologien: GRETCHEN-Unternehmensbefragung (April - Juli 2014) - Deskriptive Ergebnisse. 2015, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/ccx/gretchen/Rogge-2015-GRETCHEN_Befragungsergebnisse.pdf).
97. Rogge, K.S., Dütschke, E., What makes them believe in the low carbon energy transition? Exploring corporate perceptions of the credibility of climate policy mixes. Environ. Sci. Policy 87 (2018), 74–84, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.009.
98. Rogge, K.S., Hoffmann, V.H., The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies. Energy Policy 38:12 (2010), 7639–7652.
99. Rogge, K.S., Reichardt, K., Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Res. Policy 45:8 (2016), 1620–1635.
100. Rogge, K.S., Schneider, M., Hoffmann, V.H., The innovation impact of the EU emission trading system — findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecol. Econ. 70:3 (2011), 513–523.
101. Rogge, K.S., Kern, F., Howlett, M., Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33 (2017), 1–10.
102. Schleich, J., Walz, R., Ragwitz, M., Effects of policies on patenting in wind-power technologies. Energy Policy 108 (2017), 684–695.
103. Schmid, E., Knopf, B., Pechan, A., Putting an energy system transformation into practice: the case of the German energiewende. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11 (2016), 263–275.
104. Schmid, E., Pechan, A., Mehnert, M., Eisenack, K., Imagine all these futures: on heterogeneous preferences and mental models in the German energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27 (2017), 45–56.
105. Schmidt, T.S., Schneider, M., Rogge, K.S., Schuetz, M.J.A., Hoffmann, V.H., The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: a survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 2 (2012), 23–48.
106. Schot, J., Steinmueller, E., Framing Innovation Policy for Transformative Change: Innovation Policy 3.0. 2016, University of Sussex, Brighton.
107. Smith, A., Raven, R., What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 1025–1036.
108. Smith Stegen, K., Seel, M., The winds of change: how wind firms assess Germany's energy transition. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 1481–1489.
109. Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy, 1(1/2), 2004, 4.
110. Sovacool, B.K., The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy. Energy Policy 37:4 (2009), 1–1529.
111. Strunz, S., The German energy transition as a regime shift. Ecol. Econ. 100 (2014), 150–158.
112. Taylor, M., Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: lessons from California's solar policy. Energy Econ. 30:6 (2008), 2829–2854.
113. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manage. J. 18:7 (1997), 509–533.
114. Uyarra, E., Shapira, P., Harding, A., Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: challenges of a place-blind policy mix. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 103 (2016), 264–272.
115. Veugelers, R., Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?. Res. Policy 41:10 (2012), 1770–1778.
116. Weber, K.M., Rohracher, H., Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 1037–1047.
117. Wernerfelt, B., A Resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manage. J. 5:2 (1984), 171–180.
118. White, W., Lunnan, A., Nybakk, E., Kulisic, B., The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency. Biomass Bioenergy 57 (2013), 97–105.
119. Wieczorek, A.J., Hekkert, M.P., Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Sci. Public Policy 39:1 (2012), 74–87.
120. Ziegler, A., Disentangling technological innovations: a micro-econometric analysis of their determinants. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 58:2 (2013), 315–335.