The costs of marginalization: Qualitative methods in the study of American politics

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 146-169

  Pierson, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Political development; Political economy; Process tracing; Public policy; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845969186     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006296347     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space. Social Forces, 75, 1149-1182.
2. Abbott, A. (2000). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Almond, G. (1988). Separate tables: Schools and sects in political science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 21, 828-842.
4. American Political Science Association. (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Arnold, R. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Bartels, L. (2002, August). Economic inequality and political representation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
7. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Bennett, A., Barth, A., & Rutherford, K. R. (2003). Do we preach what we practice? A survey of methods in political science journals and curricula. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36, 373-378.
9. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455-476.
10. Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11. Burke, T. (2002). Lawyers, lawsuits and legal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago: Aldine.
13. Carpenter, D. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Derthick, M. (1979). Policymaking for social security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15. Derthick, M. (2003). Up in smoke: From legislation to litigation in tobacco politics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
16. Fenno, R. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
17. Fiorina, M. (1977). Congress: Keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Gerring, J. (2003). APD from a methodological point of view. Studies in American Political Development, 17, 82-102.
20. Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (n.d.). Scope: Causal and conceptual homogeneity in qualitative research. Unpublised manuscript, Northwestern University.
21. Hacker, J. (2002). The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Hacker, J. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state. American Political Science Review, 98, 243-260.
23. Hall, P. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative politics. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373-404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Hattam, V. (1993). Labor visions and state power: The origins of business unionism in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Howard, C. (1997). The hidden welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, democracy and welfare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. James, S. (2000). Presidents, parties, and the state: A party system perspective on democratic regulatory choice, 1884-1936. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kagan, R. (2001). Adversarial legalism: The American way of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. King, D. (2006). The liberty of strangers: Making the American nation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Lindblom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Mares, I. (2003). The politics of social risk: Business and welfare state development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Mayhew, D. (1991). Divided we govern. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. McCarty, N., Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. McCubbins, M., Noll, R., & Weingast, B. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3, 243-277.
38. McDonagh, E. (1993). The "welfare rights state" and the "civil rights state": Policy paradox and state building in the progressive era. Studies in American Political Development, 7, 225-274.
39. Melnick, R. S. (1994). Between the lines. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Milkis, S. (1993). The president and the parties: The transformation of the American party system since the New Deal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41. Morone, J. (2003). Hellfire nation: The politics of sin in American history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Orren, K., & Skowronek, C. (2004) The search for American political development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Patashnik, E. (2003). After the public interest prevails: The political sustainability of policy reform. Governance, 16, 203-234.
44. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In H. Milner & I. Katznelson (Eds.), Political science: State of the discipline (pp. 693-721). New York: Norton.
46. Polsky, A. (1991). The rise of the therapeutic state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577-592.
48. Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Rule, J. (1997). Theory and progress in social science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Skrentny, J. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture, and justice in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Skrentny, J. (2002). The minority rights revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Smith, R. (1997). Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55. Stinchcombe, A. (2005). The logic of social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Swenson, P. (1989). Fair shares: Unions, pay and politics in Sweden and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
57. Talbert, J. C., & Potoski, M. (2002). The changing public agenda over the postwar period. In F. R. Baumgartner & B. D. Jones (Eds.), Policy domains (pp. 189-204). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Teles, S. (in press). The evolution of the conservative legal movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60. Vogel, D. (1990). Fluctuating fortunes. New York: Basic Books.
61. Weaver, R. K. (2003). Ending welfare as we knew it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
62. Weir, M., Orloff, A., & Skocpol, T. (1985). The politics of social policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.