Publisher Correction: Policy sequencing toward decarbonization (Nature Energy DOI: 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8);Policy sequencing toward decarbonization

Nature Energy

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 918-922

  Meckling, Jonas ^a   Sterner, Thomas ^b   Wagner, Gernot ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECARBONIZATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EMISSION CONTROL;

ECONOMIC INTERESTS; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; GREEN INNOVATIONS; INDUSTRIAL POLICIES; LOW-CARBON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY; LOW-CARBON POLICIES; POLITICAL CONSTRAINTS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

COSTS;

EID: 85033594200     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20587546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0089-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. Tietenberg, T. H. Reflections-carbon pricing in practice. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 7, 313-329 (2013).
2. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. & Hemous, D. The Environment and Directed Technical Change FEEM Working Paper No. 93.2010 https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1668575 (2010).
3. Fischer, C. & Newell, R. G. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 55, 142-162 (2008).
4. Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D. & Kerr, W. Transition to clean technology. J. Polit. Econ. 124, 52-104 (2016).
5. Wagner, G. et al. Energy policy: Push renewables to spur carbon pricing. Nature 525, 27-29 (2015).
6. Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E. & Zysman, J. Winning coalitions for climate policy: green industrial policy builds support for carbon regulation. Science 349, 1170-1171 (2015).
7. Rodrik, D. Green industrial policy. Ox. Rev. Econ. Policy 30, 469-491 (2014).
8. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G. & Stavins, R. N. Environmental policy and technological change. Environ. Res. Econ. 22, 41-70 (2002).
9. Barbier, E. B. Building the green economy. Canadian Public Policy 42, S1-S9 (2016).
10. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2015 (World Bank, Washington DC, 2015).
11. Biber, E. Cultivating a green political landscape: lessons for climate change policy from the defeat of California's Proposition 23. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 66, 399-462 (2013).
12. Qi, Y. & Wu, T. The politics of climate change in China. WIREs Clim. Change 4, 301-313 (2013).
13. Schmitz, H., Johnson, O. & Altenburg, T. Rent management-the heart of green industrial policy. New Polit. Econ. https://doi.org/cdtc (2015).
14. Kelsey, S. M. The Green Spiral: Policy-Industry Feedback and the Success of International Environmental Negotiation. PhD Thesis, Univ. California Berkeley (2014).
15. Keohane, R. O. The global politics of climate change: challenge for political science. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 48, 19-26 (2015).
16. Nahm, J. Renewable futures and industrial legacies: wind and solar sectors in China, Germany, and the United States. Business Polit. 19, 68-106 (2017).
17. Kim, E. S., Yang, J. & Urpelainen, J. Does power sector regulation promote or discourage renewable energy policy? Evidence from the States, 1991-2012. Rev. Policy Res. 33, 22-50 (2015).
18. Borenstein, S. & Bushnell, J. The US electricity industry after 20 years of restructuring. Ann. Rev. Econ. 7, 437-463 (2015).
19. Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C. & Hoggett, R. Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda. Environ. Planning C Gov. Policy 35, 312-333 (2016).
20. Jenkins, J. D. & Karplus, V. J. Carbon Pricing Under Binding Political Constraints (United Nations University, Helsinki, 2016).
21. Schmidt, T. S. & Sewerin, S. Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nat. Energy 2, 17084 (2017).
22. Revolution Now: The Future Arrives for Five Clean Energy Technologies (Department of Energy, Washington DC, 2015).
23. van Benthem, A., Gillingham, K. & Sweeney, J. Learning-by-doing and the optimal solar policy in California. Energy J. 29, 131-151 (2008).
24. Jenkins, J. D. Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design? Energy Policy 69, 467-477 (2014).
25. Aldy, J. E. & Pizer, W. A. The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation policies. J. Assoc. Environ. Res. Econ. 2, 565-595 (2015).
26. Gawel, E., Strunz, S. & Lehmann, P. A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU - How do the emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact? Energy Policy 64, 175-182 (2014).
27. Morgan, M. G. Opinion: Climate policy needs more than muddling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2322-2324 (2016).
28. Sachs, J. D. et al. Why Climate Policy Needs Long-Term Deep Decarbonization Pathways (United Nations, 2015).
29. Kimura, O. Japanese Top Runner Approach for Energy Efficiency Standards (Socio-Economic Research Centre, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2010).
30. Cole, D. H. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 114-118 (2015).
31. Sivaram, V. Ensuring Tesla doesn't out the batteries of the future. Forbes (30 April 2015).
32. Zysman, J. & Huberty, M. Can Green Sustain Growth? (Stanford Business Books, 2014).
33. del Río, P. & Mir-Artigues, P. Support for solar PV deployment in Spain: Some policy lessons. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 16, 5557-5566 (2012).
34. Stokes, L. C. Power Politics: Renewable Energy Policy Change in US States. Dissertation, MIT (2015).
35. Callaway, D., Fowlie, M. & McCormick, G. Location, Location, Location: The Variable Value of Renewable Energy and Demand-Side Efficiency Resources (UC Berkeley, CA, 2015).
36. Simoes, S., Nijs, W., Ruiz, P., Sgobbi, A. & Thiel, C. Comparing policy routes for low-carbon power technology deployment in EU - an energy system analysis. Energy Policy 101, 353-365 (2017).
37. Mitchell, C. Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables. Nat. Energy 1, 15030 (2016).
38. Helm, D. The European framework for energy and climate policies. Energy Policy 64, 29-35 (2014).
39. Böhringer, C. & Rosendahl, K. E. Green promotes the dirtiest: on the interaction between black and green quotas in energy markets. J. Regulatory Econ 37, 316-325 (2010).
40. Fischer, C. & Preonas, L. Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less than the Sum of Its Parts? Discussion paper 10-19 (2010).
41. Rabe, B. G. The durability of carbon cap-and-trade policy. Governance 29, 103-119 (2016).
42. Houle, D., Lachapelle, E. & Purdon, M. Comparative politics of sub-federal cap-and-trade: Implementing the Western Climate Initiative. Global Environ. Pol. 15, 49-73 (2015).
43. Hammar, H., Löfgren, A. & Sterner, T. Political economy obstacles to fuel taxation. Energy J. 25, 1-17 (2004).
44. Huberty, M. Energy Systems Transformation and the Political Economy of Climate Change. PhD Thesis, Univ. California Berkeley (2013).
45. Knox-Hayes, J. Negotiating climate legislation: Policy path dependence and coalition stabilization. Regulation Gov. 6, 545-567 (2012).
46. Mackinder, E. Pro-environment groups outmatched, outspent in battle over climate change legislation. OpenSecrets (23 August 2010).
47. Sullivan, C. & Kahn, D. Voters Reject 2-Sided Assault on Climate Law. ClimateWire (3 November 2010).
48. Meckling, J. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading (MIT Press, 2011).
49. Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T. & Khan, M. R. Power in a Warming World (MIT Press, 2015).
50. Victor, D. G. Global Warming Gridlock (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
51. Markussen, P. & Svendsen, G. T. Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy 33, 245-255 (2005).
52. Cook, B. J. Arenas of power in climate change policymaking. Policy Studies J. 38, 465-486 (2010).
53. Harrison, K. A tale of two taxes: the fate of environmental tax reform in Canada. Rev. Policy Res. 29, 383-407 (2012).
54. Murray, B. C. & Maniloff, P. T. Why have greenhouse emissions in RGGI states declined? An econometric attribution to economic, energy market, and policy factors. Energy Econ. 51, 581-589 (2015).
55. Calel, R. & Dechezleprêtre, A. Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Rev. Econ. Stat. 98, 173-191 (2016).
56. Wettestad, J. & Rescuing, E. U. emissions trading: mission impossible? Global Environ. Pol. 14, 64-81 (2014).
57. Duff, D. G. Carbon taxation in British Columbia. Vermont J. Environ. Law 10, 87-107 (2008).
58. Raymond, L. Reclaiming the Atmospheric Commons: The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and a New Model of Emissions Trading (MIT Press, 2016).
59. Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S. & Auld, G. Overcoming the tragedy of super-wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci. 45, 123-152 (2012).
60. Partnership for Market Readiness and International Carbon Action Partnership. Emissions Trading in Practice: a Handbook on Design and Implementation (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016).
61. Sterner, T. Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy 25, 3194-3202 (2007).
62. Williams, J. H. et al. The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity. Science 335, 53-59 (2012).
63. World Bank, Ecofys Carbon Pricing Watch 2016 (Washington DC, 2016).
64. Barbier, E. B. Is green growth relevant for poor economies? Res. Energy Econ. 45, 178-191 (2016).
65. World Energy Outlook (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2015).