Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities

Scienze Regionali

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 57-80

  Rodríguez Bolívar, Manuel Pedro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Public value creation; Smart cities; Smart governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043452549     PISSN: 17203929     EISSN: 2035603X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14650/88817     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Albert A., Passmore E. (2008), Public Value and Participation: A Literature Review for the Scottish Government. Scottish Government. Retrieved from: http://www.nls.uk/scotgov/2008/0057753.pdf.
2. Alkandari A., Alnasheet M., Alshaikhli I. F. T. (2012), Smart Cities: Survey. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 2, 2: 79-90.
3. Baccarne B., Mechant P., Schuurman D., De Marez L., Colpaert P. (2014), Urban Socio-Technical Innovations with and by Citizens. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3, 4: 143-156.
4. Bátágan L. (2011), Smart Cities and Sustainability Models. Informatica Economicá, 15, 3: 80-87.
5. Batty M., Axhausen K. W., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., Ouzounis G., Portugali Y. (2012), Smart Cities of the Future. European Physical Journal, 214: 481-518. DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3.
6. Benington J. (2011), From Private Choice to Public Value? In: Benington J., Moore M. H. (eds.), Public Value: Theory and Practice. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 31-49.
7. Berntzen L., Johannessen M. R. (2016), The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway. In: Gil-Garcia J., Pardo T., Nam T. (eds.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Cham: Springer, 299-314. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_16.
8. Bertot J. C., Jaeger P. T., Hansen D. (2012), The Impact of Policies on Government Social Media Usage: Issues, Challenges, and Recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 1: 30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.
9. Bryson J. M., Crosby B. C., Stone Middleton M. (2006), The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66, s1: 44-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x.
10. Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. (2011), Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18, 2: 65-82. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
11. Castelnovo W., Misuraca G., Savoldelli A. (2015), Citizen’s Engagement and Value Co-Production in Smart and Sustainable Cities. International Conference on Public Policy, 1-16.
12. Castelnovo W., Misuraca G., Savoldelli A. (2016), Smart Cities Governance. The Need for a Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 6: 724-739. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315611103.
13. Centre for Cities (2014), What Does it Mean to Be a Smart City? Retrieved online on December 1, 2014 from: http://www.centreforcities.org/blog/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-smart-city/.
14. Coe A., Paquet G., Roy J. (2001), E-Governance and Smart Communities: A Social Learning Challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 1: 80-93. DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900107.
15. Cordella A., Bonina C. M. (2012), A Public Value Perspective for ICT Enabled Public Sector Reforms: A Theoretical Reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 4: 512-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004.
16. Cosgrave E., Tryfonas T., Crick T. (2014), The Smart City from a Public Value Perspective. In: Hojer M., Lago P., Wangel J. (eds.), (Proceedings) 2nd International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICTS). Stockholm, Sweden: Atlantis Press, 369-377.
17. Crabtree B. F., Miller W. L. (eds.) (1999), Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
18. Dameri R. P. (2012), Defining an Evaluation Framework for Digital Cities Implementation. Information Society (i-Society), 2012 International Conference on Information Society, IEEE, June, 466-470.
19. Dameri R. P. (2014), Comparing Smart and Digital City: Initiatives and Strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are They Digital and/or Smart? In: Dameri R. P., Rosenthal-Sabroux C. (eds.), Smart City. How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space. Cham: Springer, 45-88. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_3.
20. Delmastro F., Arnaboldi V., Conti M. (2016), People-Centric Computing and Communications in Smart Cities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54, 7: 122-128. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2016.7509389.
21. Dvir R., Pasher E. (2004), Innovation Engines for Knowledge Cities: An Innovation Ecology Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 5: 16-27. DOI: 10.1108/13673270410558756.
22. Epstein M. J., Yuthas K. (2014), Measuring and Improving Social Impacts: A Guide for Nonprofits, Companies, and Impact Investors. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
23. Ernst & Young (2014), Creating Public Value. Transforming Australia’s Social Services. Australia: Ernst & Young.
24. EUROCITIES (2011), Developing Europe Urban’s Model. 25 Years of EUROCITIES. December. Available at: http://nws.eurocities.eu/MediaShell/media/Develop-ing_Europe_s_urban_model_-_25_years_of_EUROCITIES-NVAT_12212.pdf.
25. European Parliament (2014), Mapping Smart Cities in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies.
26. Farrell D., Goodman A. (2013), Government by Design: Four Principles for a Better Public Sector. McKinsey Company. Retrieved from: http://economicgrowthdc. org/work/assets/McKinsey-Building-Better-Government.pdf.
27. Fazekas M., Burns T. (2012), Exploring the Complex Interaction Between Governance and Knowledge in Education. OECD Education Working Papers n. 67, OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/5k9flcx2l340-en.
28. Gains F., Stoker G. (2009), Delivering «Public Value»: Implications for Accountability and Legitimacy. Parliamentary Affairs, 62, 3: 438-455. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsp007.
29. Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., Pichler-Milanovic N., Meijers E. (2007), Smart Cities. Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities, Centre of Regional Science of Vienna. Retrieved from: http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf.
30. st Century City: Smartness as Technologies and Innovation in Urban Contexts. In: Gil-Garcia J., Pardo T., Nam T. (eds.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Cham: Springer, 1-19. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_1.
31. Giuffrè T., Siniscalchi M. S., Tesorierea G. (2012), A Novel Architecture of Parking Management for Smart Cities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 3: 16-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.856.
32. Hagy S., Morrison G. M., Elfstrand P. (2017), Co-Creation in Living Labs. In: Keyson D., Guerra-Santin O., Lockton D. (eds.), Living Labs. Cham: Springer, 169-178. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_13.
33. Harrison T. M., Guerrero S., Burke G. B., Cook M., Cresswell A., Helbig N., Hrdinova J., Pardo T. (2012), Open Government and E-Government: Democratic Challenges from a Public Value Perspective. Information Polity, 17, 2: 83-97. DOI: 10.3233/IP-2012-0269.
34. Hawkins C. V. (2011), Smart Growth Policy Choice: A Resource Dependency and Local Governance Explanation. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 4: 679-707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00427.x.
35. Kim S. T. (2004), Toward a New Paradigm of E-Government: From Bureaucracy Model to Governance Model. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Administrative Sciences, Seoul, Korea, July 14-15.
36. King N. (2004), Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text. In: Cassell C., Symon G. (eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage, 256-270.
37. Kooiman J. (2003), Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
38. Kooiman J., Banvick M., Chuenpadgee R., Mahon R., Pullin R. (2008), Interactive Governance and Governability: An Introduction. The Journal of Transdiscipli-nary Environmental Studies, 7, 1: 1-11.
39. Kourtit K., Nijkamp P., Arribas D. (2012), Smart Cities in Perspective – A Comparative European Study by Means of Self-Organizing Maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25, 2: 229-246. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2012.660330.
40. th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: ACM, 240-249. DOI: 10.1145/2910019.2910103.
41. Larios V. M., Gomez L., Mora O. B., Maciel R., Villanueva-Rosales N. (2016), Living Labs for Smart Cities: A Use Case in Guadalajara City to Foster Innovation and Develop Citizen-Centered Solutions. In: IEEE 2nd International Smart Cities Conference: Improving the Citizens Quality of Life, ISC2 2016, Proceedings [07580773] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. DOI: 10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580773.
42. Lee J. H., Phaal R., Lee S.-H. (2013), An Integrated Service-Device-Technology Roadmap for Smart City Development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 2: 286-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.020.
43. Linders D. (2012), From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 4: 446-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
44. Malecki E. J. (2002), Hard and Soft Networks for Urban Competitiveness. Urban Studies, 39, 5-6: 929-945.
45. Matell M. S., Jacoby J. (1971), Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 3: 657-674. DOI: 10.1177/001316447103100307.
46. Meijer A. (2016), Smart City Governance: A Local Emergent Perspective. In: Gil-Garcia J., Pardo T., Nam T. (eds.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Cham: Springer, 73-85. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_4.
47. Meijer A., Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2013), Governing the Smart City: Scaling-Up the Search for Socio-Techno Synergy. Paper presented at EGPA Conference 2013, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from: https://www.scss.tcd.ie/disciplines/information_systems/egpa/docs/2013/BolivarMeijer.pdf.
48. Meijer A., Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2016), Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 2: 392-408. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314564308.
49. Mergel I. (2013), Social Media Adoption and Resulting Tactics in the US Federal Government. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 2: 123-130. DOI: 10.1016/j. giq.2012.12.004.
50. Mintrom M. (2003), People Skills for Policy Analysts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
51. Mintrom M., Luetjens J. (2017), Creating Public Value: Tightening Connections Between Policy Design and Public Management. Policy Studies Journal, 45, 1: 170-190. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12116.
52. Moore M. H. (1995), Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA, London, UK: Harvard University Press.
53. Norman G. (2010), Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the «Laws» of Statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 5: 625-632. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
54. Noveck B. S. (2009), Wiki Government. How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
55. Odendaal N. (2003), Information and Communication Technology and Local Governance: Understanding the Difference between Cities in Developed and Emerging Economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27, 6: 585-607. DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00016-4.
56. OECD (2010), Denmark: Efficient E-Government for Smarter Service Delivery. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264087118-en.
57. Pearsall J. (2016), Concise Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58. Pinnegar S., Marceau J., Randolph B. (2008), Innovation for a Carbon Constrained City: Challenges for the Built Environment Industry. Innovation, 10, 2-3: 303-315. DOI: 10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.303.
59. Preissl B., Mueller J. (eds.) (2006), Governance of Communication Networks. Connecting Societies and Markets with IT. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
60. Provan K. G., Kenis P. (2008), Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 18, 2: 229-252. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum015.
61. Puppim de Oliveira J. A., Doll C. N. H., Balaban O., Jiang P., Dreyfus M., Suwa A., Moreno-Penaranda R., Dirgahayani P. (2013), Green Economy and Governance in Cities: Assessing Good Governance in Key Urban Economic Processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 1: 138-152. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2013.07.043.
62. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2015a), The Influence of Political Factors in Policy-makers’ Perceptions on the Implementation of Web 2.0 Technologies for Citizen Participation and Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Delivery. Information Polity, 20, 2, 3: 199-220. DOI: 10.3233/IP-150365.
63. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2015b), Policy Makers’ Perceptions on the Transformational Effect of Web 2.0 Technologies on Public Services Delivery. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 2: 227-254. DOI: 10.1007/s10660-015-9196-1.
64. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2015c), Governance Models for the Delivery of Public Services Through the Web 2.0 Technologies. A Political View in Large Spanish Municipalities. Social Science Computer Review, 35, 2: 203-225. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315609919.
65. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2016), Characterizing the Role of Governments in Smart Cities: A Literature Review. In: Gil-Garcia J., Pardo T., Nam T. (eds.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Cham: Springer, 49-71. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_3.
66. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P. (2017), Governance Models for the Delivery of Public Services Through the Web 2.0 Technologies: A Political View in Large Spanish Municipalities. Social Science Computer Review, 35, 2: 203-225.
67. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P., Meijer A. J. (2015), Smart Governance. Using a Literature Review and Empirical Analysis to Build a Research Model. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 6: 673-692. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315611088.
68. Rodríguez Bolívar M. P., Alcaide Muñoz L., López Hernández A. M. (2016), Scientometric Study of the Progress and Development of E-Government Research during the Period 2000-2012. Information Technology for Development, 22, 1: 36-74.
69. Rosado L., Hagy S., Kalmykova Y., Morrison G., Ostermeyer Y. (2015), A Living Lab Co-Creation Environment Exemplifying Factor 10 Improvements in a City District. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 8, 2: 171-185.
70. Russell C. J., Bobko P. (1992), Moderated Regression Analysis and Likert Scales: Too Coarse for Comfort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 3: 336-342. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.336.
71. Schaffers H., Komninos N., Pallot M., Aguas M., Almirall E., Bakici T., Hielkema H. et al. (2012), Smart Cities as Innovation Ecosystems Sustained by the Future Internet. Fireball White Paper, European Union.
72. Scholl H. (2009), Profiling the EG Research Community and its Core. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5693: 1-12. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_1.
73. Scholl H. J., Scholl M. C. (2014), Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice. iConference 2014 Proceedings, 163-176. DOI: 10.9776/14060.
74. Schuurman D., De Marez L., Ballon P. (2016), The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1, 6: 7-16. Retrieved from: http://timreview. ca/article/956.
75. Scott J. W. (2007), Smart Growth as Urban Reform: A Pragmatic «Recoding» of the New Regionalism. Urban Studies, 44, 1: 15-35. DOI: 10.1080/00420980601074284.
76. Shin J.-S. (2005), The Role of the State in the Increasingly Globalized Economy: Implications for Singapore. The Singapore Economic Review, 50, 1: 103-116. DOI: 10.1142/S0217590805001895.
77. Shirky C. (2011), The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change. Foreign Affairs, 90, 1: 28-41.
78. Sorrentino M., Niehaves B. (2010), Intermediaries in E-Inclusion: A literature Review. System Sciences (HICSS), Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science – 2010, 1-10. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.239.
79. Span K. C. L., Luijkx K. K. G., Schols J. M. G. A., Schalk R. (2012), The Relationship between Governance Roles and Performance in Local Public Inter-organizational Networks. A Conceptual Analysis. American Review of Public Administration, 42, 2: 186-201. DOI: 10.1177/0275074011402193.
80. Staffans A., Horelli L. (2014), Expanded Urban Planning as a Vehicle for Understanding and Shaping Smart, Liveable Cities. The Journal of Community Informatics, 10, 3. Retrieved from: http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1171/1110.
81. Uhl-Bien M., Marion R., McKelvey B. (2007), Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 4: 298-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.
82. Vigoda E. (2002), From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62, 5: 527-540. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6210.00235.
83. Wakita T., Ueshima N., Noguchi H. (2012), Psychological Distance between Categories in the Likert Scale. Comparing Different Numbers of Options. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 4: 533-546. DOI: 10.1177/0013164411431162.
84. Webster J., Watson R. T. (2002), Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (Editorial). MIS Quarterly, 26, 2: xiii-xxiii.
85. Winters J. V. (2011), Why Are Smart Cities Growing? Who Moves and Who Stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51, 2: 253-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x.
86. Working Group on Citizen Engagement with Local Government (2014), Working Group Report on Citizen Engagement with Local Government. Dublin: Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. Retrieved from: http://www.volunteerkerry.ie/images/docs/research/Working_Group_Re-port_on_Citizen_Engagement_with_Local_Goverment.pdf.