Smart City Governance: A Local Emergent Perspective

Public Administration and Information Technology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 73-85

  Meijer, Albert ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Contextual approach; Multidimensional evaluation framework; Smart cities

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064733832     PISSN: 25121812     EISSN: 25121839     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients. From service-delivery to co-production. Basing-stoke: Palgrave McMillan.
3. Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New York: Yale University Press.
4. Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. (2012). Smartness and European urban performance: Assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 97–113.
5. Driessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A., & Vermeulen, W. J. (2012). Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance— experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3), 143–160.
6. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities in the global economy: A Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell Academic.
7. Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic books.
8. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state. Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
9. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.
10. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of govern-ment-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions. New York: Springer.
11. Hoh, B., Gruteser, M., Herring, R., Ban, J., Work, D., Herrera, J. C., Bayen, M., Annavaram, M., & Jacobson, Q. (2008). Virtual trip lines for distributed privacy-preserving traffic monitoring. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 15–28). ACM.
12. Hoon Lee, J. H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S.-H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 286–306.
13. Inayatullah, S. (2011). City futures in transformation: Emerging issues and case studies. Futures, 43(7), 654–661.
14. Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision-making. London: Routledge.
15. Kuk, G., & Janssen, M. (2011). The business models and information architectures of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 39–52.
16. Landry, C. (2006). The art of city making. New York: Routledge.
17. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Beijing: O’Reilly.
18. Lazariou, G., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition methodology of the smart cities model. Energy, 47(1), 326–332.
19. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.
20. Light, P. C. (2008). The search for social entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
21. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.
22. Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society. Monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
23. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: John Murray.
24. Meijer, A. J. (2009). Complex responsibilities. An empirical analysis of responsibilities and technological complexity in Dutch immigration policies. Public Management Review, 11(6), 771– 790.
25. Meijer, A. J., & Thaens, M. (2013). Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 343–350.
26. Meijer, A. J., Bannister, F., & Thaens, M. (Eds.). (2013). ICT, public administration and democracy in the coming decade. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
27. Michels, A., & Meijer, A. (2008). Safeguarding public accountability in horizontal government. Public Management Review, 10(2), 165–173.
28. Nijkamp, P., & Kourtit, K. (2013). The “New Urban Europe”: Global challenges and local responses in the urban century. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 291–315.
29. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–427.
30. Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372–396.
31. Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414–23.
33. Radaelli, C., & De Francesco, F. (2010). Regulatory impact assessment. In M. Cave, R. Baldwin, & M. Lodge (Eds.), Oxford handbook of regulation (pp. 279–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
35. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In J. Domingue, A. Galis, A. Gavras, T. Zahariadis, & D. Lambert (Eds.), The future internet (pp. 431–446). Heidelberg: Springer.
36. Schulz, M., van der Steen, M., & van Twist, M. (2013). De koopman als dominee. Sociaal onder-nemerschap in het publieke domein. Den Haag: Boom Lemma.
37. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.
38. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1–28.
39. Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135.
41. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand “Smart City” initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge: Forrester Research, Inc.
42. Winters, J. V. (2011). Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51(2), 253–270.
43. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K., & Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2008). Rising knowledge cities: The role of urban knowledge precincts. Journal of knowledge management, 12(5), 8–20.
44. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.