Smart Governance: Using a Literature Review and Empirical Analysis to Build a Research Model

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 673-692

  Bolívar, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez ^a   Meijer, Albert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

empirical analysis; literature review; research model; Smart governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992597310     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439315611088     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alkandari A., Alnasheet M., Alshekhly I. F. T., (2012). Smart cities: Survey. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 2, 79–90.
2. AMETIC. (2013). Smart cities 2012. Madrid, Spain: Leaders Comunicación.
3. Andersen J. P., Hammarfelt B., (2011). Price revisited: On the growth of dissertations in eight research fields. Scientometrics, 88, 371–383.
4. Barber B., (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Barrionuevo J. M., Berrone P., Ricart J. E., (2012). Smart cities, sustainable progress. IESE Insight, 14, 50–57.
6. Bătăgan L., (2011). Smart cities and sustainability models. Informatica Economică, 15, 80–87.
7. Batty M., Axhausen K. W., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., …Portugali Y., (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal, 214, 481–518.
8. Bertram D., (2007). Likert scales. Retrieved June 28, 2014, from the University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science Web Site: http://poincare.matf.bg.ac.rs/∼kristina/topic-dane-likert.pdf
9. Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P., (2009). Smart cities in Europe. Proceedings to the 3rd Central European Conference on Regional Science, Košice, Slovak Republic, 45–59.
10. Deakin M., (2012). Intelligent cities as smart providers: CoPs as organizations for developing integrated models of eGovernment services. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25, 115–135.
11. EUROCITIES. (2011, 12). Developing Europe urban’s model. 25 years of EUROCITIES. Retrieved from http://nws.eurocities.eu/MediaShell/media/Developing_Europe_s_urban_model_-_25_years_of_EUROCITIES-NVAT_12212.pdf
12. Florida R., 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13. Flyvbjerg B., (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Giffinger R., Gudrun H., (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of cities? ACE: Architecture, City & Environ, 4, 7–25.
15. Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Meijers E., Pichler-Milanović N., (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
16. Gil-García J., (2012). Towards a smart state? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration and beyond. Information Polity, 17, 269–280.
17. Giuffrè T., Marco Siniscalchia S., Tesorierea G., (2012). A novel architecture of parking management for smart cities. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 16–28.
18. Hodge D. R., Gillespie D., (2003). Phrase completions: An alternative to Likert scales. Social Work Research, 27, 45–55.
19. Hollands R. G., (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up. City, 12, 303–320.
20. Hoon Lee J., Phaal R., Lee S.-H., (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80, 286–306.
21. Jacso P., (2013). The volume of full-text coverage of top-tier marketing journals in the ABI/INFORM and business source premier databases—Key indicators for database licensing. Online Information Review, 37, 132–145.
22. Kourtit K., Nijkamp P., Arribas D., (2012). Smart cities in perspective—A comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25, 229–246.
23. Krippendorff K., (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Lan Z., Anders K. K., (2000). A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: An empirical test. Administration and Society, 32, 138–165.
25. Landry C., (2006). The art of city making. London, England: Routledge.
26. Leydesdorff L., Deakin M., (2011). Triple-Helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18, 53–63.
27. Li Q., (2013). A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 1609–1618.
28. Linders D., (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 446–454.
29. Lombardi P., Giordano S., Farouh H., Yousef W., (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25, 137–149.
30. Matell M. S., Jacoby J., (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scale items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657–674.
31. Meijer A., Rodríguez Bolívar M. P., (2013). Governing the smart city: Scaling-up the search for sociotechnosynergy. Paper presented at EGPA Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
32. Murad A. A., Tomov D. T., (2012). Institutionalization and internationalization of research on the applications of the geographical information systems in health planning. Scientometrics, 91, 143–158.
33. Nam T., (2012). Modeling municipal service integration: A comparative case study of New York and Philadelphia 311 systems (Dissertation). University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany.
34. Norman G., (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625–632.
35. Odendaal N., (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27, 585–607.
36. Orvik J. M., (1972). Social desirability for individual, his group, and society. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 7, 3–32.
37. Parthemore J., Morse A. F., (2010). Representations reclaimed. Accounting for the co-emergence of concepts and experience. Pragmatics & Cognition, 18, 273–312.
38. Pickett C., (2013). Eliminating administrative churn: The “Big deal” and database subscriptions. Serials Review, 37, 258–261.
39. Power A., (1999, 7). Poor areas and social exclusion. Paper Presented at the CASE/LSE Housing Seminar on “Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities.”
40. Russell C. J., Bobko P., (1992). Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: Too coarse for comfort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 336–342.
41. Schuurman D., Baccarne B., De Marez L., Mechant P., (2012). Smart Ideas for Smart Cities: Investigating Crowdsourcing for Generating and Selecting Ideas for ICT Innovation in a City Context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7 (3), 49–62.
42. Shapiro J. M., (2006). Smart cities: Quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 324–335.
43. Spector P. E., (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Tapscott D., Agnew D., (1999). Governance in the digital economy. The Importance of Human Development. Finance & Development, 36, 34–37.
45. Tranos E., Gertner D., (2012). Smart networked cities? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25, 175–190.
46. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2007, 1). Good governance. UNESCAP. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp
47. Walravens N., (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7, 121–135.
48. Willke H., (2007). Smart governance: Governing the global knowledge society. New York, NY: Campus Verlag.
49. Winters J. V., (2011). Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51, 253–270.
50. Yigitcanlar T., Velibeyoglu K., Martinez-Fernandez C., (2008). Rising knowledge cities: The role of urban knowledge precincts. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 8–20.