Co-creation in living labs

Living Labs: Design and Assessment of Sustainable Living

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 169-178

  Hagy, Shea ^a   Morrison, Gregory M ^b   Elfstrand, Peter ^c  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Tengbom Architecture   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Co creation; Living labs

Indexed keywords

CO-CREATION; LIVING LAB; MULTI-FUNCTIONAL DESIGN; OPEN INNOVATION; OPERATIONAL PHASE; SOCIAL LEARNING; STAKEHOLDER VALUES; VALUE PERCEPTIONS;

LABORATORIES;

EID: 85017607796     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Baars, T. (2010). Experiential science; towards an integration of implicit and reflected practitioner-expert knowledge in the scientific development of organic farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, published on-line.
2. Carew, A. L., & Wickson, F. (2010). The TD wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 1146-1155.
3. CDIO: Conceive Design Implement Operate (2015). Home. http://www.cdio.org/. (21 September 2015).
4. Franz, Y. (2015). Designing social living labs in urban research. Info, 17(4), 53-66.
5. Hadorn, G. H., Pohl, Ch., & Scheringer, M. (2003). Methodology of transdisciplinary Research. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) (Eds.), UNESCO and EOLSS Publishers. Paris: UNESCO.
6. Hadorn, G. H., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2008). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research, Ecological Economics, 119-128.
7. Hughes, T. (2014). Co-creation: Moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the Triple Helix, Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, pp. 1-13.
8. Ind, N., & Coates, N. (2013). The meanings of co-creation. European Business Review, 25(1), 86-95.
9. Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to Education and Innovation. Policy Sciences, 1, 403-428.
10. Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2012). Towards innovation in Living Labs networks. Int. J. Product Development, 17(1/2), 43-59.
11. Leys, A. J., & Vanclay, J. K. (2011). Social learning: A knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy, 28, 574-584.
12. Mangyoku, M., Aragall, F., Serra, A., Sanchez, L. and Vuontisjarvi, H. (2014). ‘IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation’. 2014 International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (pp. 1-8), IEEE, Bergamo.
13. Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdiciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5-16.
14. Mobjörk, M. (2010). Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 866-873.
15. Pohl, C. (2008). From science of policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science and Policy, 11, 46-53.
16. Rosado, L., Kalmykova, Y., Hagy, S., Morrison, G., & Ostermeyer, Y. (2014). A living lab co-creation environment exemplifying Factor 10 improvements in a city district. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 8(2), 171-185.
17. Vicini, S., Bellini, S., & Sanna, A. (2013). User-driven service innovation in a smarter city Living Lab. International Conference on Service Science (pp. 254-259).