Separation of DNA for forensic applications using capillary electrophoresis

Handbook of Capillary and Microchip Electrophoresis and Associated Microtechniques, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 761-784

  Moreno, Lilliana I ^a   McCord, Bruce ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043285473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Tagliaro, F. and Smith, F., Forensic capillary electrophoresis, Trends Anal Chem, 15, 513, 1996.
2. Northrop, D., McCord, B., and Butler, J., Forensic applications of capillary electrophoresis, J Capillary Electrophor, 1, 158, 1994.
3. Barron, A., Sunada, W., and Blanch, H., Capillary electrophoresis of DNA in uncrosslinked polymer solutions: Evidence for a new mechanism of DNA separation, Biotechnol Bioeng, 52, 259, 1996.
4. Arnheim, N., Polymerase chain reaction strategy, Annu Rev Biochem, 61, 131, 1992.
5. Luckey, J. and Smith, L., Advances in DNA sequencing technology, Proc SPIE, 1891, 21, 1993.
6. Fregeau, C. and Fourney, R., DNA typing with fluorescently tagged short tandem repeats: A sensitive and accurate approach to human identification, BioTechniques, 15, 100, 1993.
7. Cohen, A., Najarian, D., Paulus, A., et al., Rapid separation and purification of oligonucleotides by high-performance capillary gel electrophoresis, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 85, 9660, 1988.
8. Kasper, T., Melera, M., Gozel, P., et al., Separation and detection of DNAby capillary electrophoresis, J Chromatogr, 458, 303, 1988.
9. Albarghouthi, M., Buchholz, B., Huiberts, P., et al., Poly-N-hydroxyethylacrylamide (polyDuramide):A novel, hydrophilic, self-coating polymer matrix for DNA sequencing by capillary electrophoresis, Electrophoresis, 23, 1429, 2002.
10. Tseng, W. and Chang, H., A new strategy for optimizing sensitivity, speed and resolution in capillary electrophoretic separation of DNA, Electrophoresis, 22, 763, 2001.
11. Mandabhushi, R., Separation of 4-color DNAsequencing extension products in noncovalently coated capillaries using low viscosity polymer solutions, Electrophoresis, 19, 224, 1998.
12. Rocheleau, M., Grey, R., Chen, D., et al., Formamide modified polyacrylamide gels for DNA sequencing by capillary gel electrophoresis, Electrophoresis, 13, 484, 1992.
13. Guttman, A. and Cooke, N., Denaturing capillary gel electrophoresis, Am Biotechnol Lab, 9, 10, 1991.
14. Brining, S., Chen, N., Yi, D., et al., Gel electrophoretic distinction between toxic and nontoxic forms of beta-amyloid (1-40), Electrophoresis, 20, 1398, 1999.
15. Ozawa, S., Sugano, K., Sonehere, T., et al., High resolution for single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis by capillary electrophoresis, Anal Chem, 76, 6122, 2004.
16. Butler, J., McCord, B., Jung, J., et al., Quantitation of polymerase chain reaction products by capillary electrophoresis using laser fluorescence, J Chromatogr B, 658, 271, 1994.
17. Butler, J., Buel, E., Crivellente, F., et al., Forensic DNA typing by capillary electrophoresis using the ABI Prism 310 and 3100 genetic analyzers for STR analysis, Electrophoresis, 25, 1397, 2004.
18. Wilson, M., Stoneking, M., Holland, M., et al., Guidelines for the use of mitochondrial DNA sequencing in forensic science, Crime Lab Digest, 20, 68, 1993.
19. LaFountain, M., Schwartz, M., Svete, P., et al., TWGDAM validation of the AmpFlSTR profiler Plus and AmpFlSTR Cofiler STR multiplex systems using capillary electrophoresis, J Forensic Sci, 46, 1191, 2001.
20. Hartzell, B., Graham, K., and McCord, B., Response of short tandem repeat systems to temperature and sizing methods, Forensic Sci Int, 133, 228, 2003.
21. Nock, T., Dove, J., McCord, B., et al., Temperature and pH studies of short tandem repeat systems using capillary electrophoresis at elevated pH, Electrophoresis, 22, 755, 2001.
22. Budowle, B., Chakraborty, R., Carmody, G., et al., Source attribution of a forensic DNA profile, Forensic Sci Comm, 2, 1, 2000.
23. Moxon, E. andWills, C., DNA microsatellites: Agents of evolution? Sci Am, 280, 94, 1999.
24. Butler, J., Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2005.
25. www.fbi.gov, accessed 12/2006.
26. Budowle, B., Moretti, T. R., Niezgoda, S. J., et al., CODIS and PCR-based short tandem repeat loci:Law enforcement tools., Forensic Science Research and Training Center, FBI Academy, 73-77.
27. Ruitberg, C. M., Reeder, D. J., and Butler, J. M., STRBase: A short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community, Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 320, 2001.
28. http://www.FBi.gov/hg/lab/codis/program.htm, accessed 8/21/07.
29. Cotton, E., Allsop, R., Guest, J., et al., Validation of the AMPFlSTR SGM plus system for use in forensic casework, Forensic Sci Int, 112, 151, 2000.
30. Krenke, B., Tereba, A., Anderson, S., et al., Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system, J Forensic Sci, 47, 773, 2002.
31. Hobson, D., Smerick, J., Brown, A., et al., A summary of the validation of the STR analysis by capillary electrophoresis: development of interpretation guidelines for the Profiler Plus and Cofiler systems for use in forensic casework, in Proceedings from the 10th International Symposium on Human Identification, Promega Corp, Coronoado Springs (1999).
32. Gill, P., Sparkes, R., Pinchin, R., et al., Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas, Forensic Sci Int, 91, 41, 1997.
33. Ladd, C., Lee, H., Yang, N., et al., Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures, Croat Med J, 42, 244, 2001.
34. Gill, P., Whitaker, J., Flaxman, C., et al., An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA, Forensic Sci Int, 112, 17, 2000.
35. Gill, P., Jeffreys, A., and Werrett, D., Forensic application of DNA “fingerprints” Nature, 318, 577, 1985.
36. Weir, B., The second national research council report on forensic DNA evidence, Am J Hum Genet, 59, 497, 1996.
37. Sajantila, A. and Budowle, B., Identification of individuals with DNA testing, Ann Med, 23, 637, 1991.
38. Fung, W. and Hu, Y., Interpreting DNA mixtures based on the NRC-II recommendation 4.1, Forensic Sci Comm, 2, 1-11, 2000.
39. Weir, B., Triggs, C., Starling, L., et al., Interpreting DNA mixtures, J Forensic Sci, 42, 213, 1997.
40. Clayton, T., Whitaker, J., Sparkes, R., et al., Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling, Forensic Sci Int, 91, 55, 1998.
41. Evett, I., Gill, P., and Lambert, J., Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNAprofiles, J Forensic Sci, 43, 62, 1998.
42. Ludes, B., Pfitzinger, H., and Mangin, P., DNA fingerprinting from tissues after variable postmortem periods, J Forensic Sci, 38, 686, 1993.
43. Smith, S. and Morin, P., Optimal storage conditions for highly diluteDNAsamples:Arole for trehalose as a preserving agent, J Forensic Sci, 50, 1101, 2005.
44. Whitaker, J., Clayton, T., Urquhart, A., et al., Short tandem repeat typing of bodies from a mass disaster:High success rate and characteristic amplification patterns in highly degraded samples, BioTechniques, 18, 670, 1995.
45. Anderson, T., Ross, J., Roby, R., et al., Avalidation study for the extraction and analysis of DNAfrom human nail material and its application to forensic casework, J Forensic Sci, 44, 1053, 1999.
46. Butler, J. M., Shen, Y., and McCord, B. R., The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA, J Forensic Sci, 48, 1054, 2003.
47. Wiegand, P. and Kleiber, M., Less is more-Length reduction of STR amplicons using redesigned primers, Int J Legal Med, 114, 285, 2001.
48. Tsukada, K., Takayanagi, K., Asamura, H., et al., Multiplex short tandem repeat typing in degraded samples using newly designed primers for the TH01, TPOX, CSF1PO, and vWA loci, Legal Med, 4, 239, 2002.
49. Drabek, J., Chung, D., Butler, J., et al., Concordance study between miniplex assays and a commercial STR typing kit, J Forensic Sci, 49, 859, 2004.
50. Coble, M. and Butler, J., Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA, J Forensic Sci, 50, 43, 2005.
51. Bender, K., Schneider, P., and Rittner, C., Application of mtDNA sequence analysis in forensic casework for the identification of human remains, Forensic Sci Int, 113, 103, 2000.
52. Saccone, C., Gissi, C., Lanave, C., et al., Evolution of the mitochondrial genetic system: An overview, Gene, 261, 153, 2000.
53. Anderson, S., Bankier, A., Barrell, B., et al., Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome, Nature, 290, 457, 1981.
54. Holland, M. and Parsons, T., Mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis-Validation and use for forensic casework, Forensic Sci Rev, 11, 21, 1999.
55. Jazin, E., Soodyall, H., Jalonen, P., et al., Mitochondrial mutation rate revisited: Hot spots and polymorphisms, Nat Genet, 18, 109, 1998.
56. Wilson, M., DiZinno, J., Polanskey, D., et al., Validation of mitochondrialDNAsequencing for forensic casework analysis, Int J Legal Med, 108, 68, 1995.
57. Kline, M., Vallone, P., Redman, J., et al., Mitochondrial DNA typing screens with control region and coding region SNPs, J Forensic Sci, 50, 377, 2005.
58. Isenberg, A. and Moore, J., Mitochondrial DNA analysis at the FBI laboratory, Forensic Sci Comm, 1, 1999.
59. Cann, R., Stoneking, M., and Wilson, A., Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution, Nature, 325, 31-36 1987.
60. Baasner, A., Schafer, C., Juge, A., et al., Polymorphic sites in human mitochondrial DNA control region sequences: Population data and maternal inheritance, Forensic Sci Int, 98, 169, 1998.
61. Budowle, B., Allard, M., Wilson, M., et al., Forensics and mitochondrial DNA: Applications, debates, and foundations, Annu Rev Genom Hum G, 4, 119, 2003.
62. Stone, A., Starrs, J., and Stoneking, M., Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the presumptive remains of Jesse James, J Forensic Sci, 46, 173, 2001.
63. vonWurmb-Schwark, N., Harbeck, M., Wiesbrock, U., et al., Extraction and amplification of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from ancient and artificially aged bones, Legal Med, 5, 169, 2003.
64. Roewer, L. and Epplen, J., Rapid and sensitive typing of forensic stains by PCR amplification of polymorphic simple repeat sequences in case work, Forensic Sci Int, 53, 163, 1992.
65. Daniels, D., Hall, A., and Ballantyne, J., SWGDAM developmental validation of a 19-locus Y-STR system for forensic casework, J Forensic Sci, 49, 1, 2004.
66. Hall, A. and Ballantyne, J., The development of an 18-locus Y-STR system for forensic casework, Anal Bioanal Chem, 376, 1234, 2003.
67. Kayser, M. and Sajantila, A., Mutations at Y-STR loci: Implications for paternity testing and forensic analysis, Forensic Sci Int, 118, 116, 2001.
68. Corach, D., Filgueira, R., Marino, M., et al., RoutineY-STR typing in forensic casework, Forensic Sci Int, 118, 131, 2001.
69. Huffine, E., Crews, J., Kennedy, B., et al., Mass identification of persons missing from the break-up of the former Yugoslavia: Structure, function, and role of the International Commission of Missing Persons, Croat Med J, 42, 271, 2001.
70. Butler, J., Recent developments in Y-short tandem repeat and Y-single nucleotide polymorphism analysis, Forensic Sci Rev, 15, 91, 2003.
71. Hedman, M., Pimenoff, V., Lukka, M., et al., Analysis of 16 Y STR loci in the Finnish population reveals a local reduction in the diversity of male lineages, Forensic Sci Int, 142, 37, 2004.
72. Silva, D., Carvalho, E., Costa, G., et al., Y-chromosome genetic variation in Rio De Janeiro population, Am J Hum Biol, 18, 829, 2006.
73. Cerri, N., Ricci, U., Sani, I., et al., Mixed stains from sexual assault cases: Autosomal orY-chromosome short tandem repeats? Croat Med J, 44, 289, 2003.
74. Hanson, E. and Ballantyne, J., A highly discriminating 21 locus Y-STR “megaplex” system designed to augment the minimal haplotype loci for forensic casework, J Forensic Sci, 49, 40, 2004.
75. Budowle, B., SNP typing strategies, Forensic Sci Int, 146, 139, 2004.
76. Vallone, P., Decker, A., and Butler, J., Allele frequencies for 70 autosomal SNPloci with US Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic samples, Forensic Sci Int, 149, 279, 2005.
77. Stoneking, M., Single nucleotide polymorphisms: From the evolutionary past, Nature, 409, 821, 2001.
78. Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., et al., The sequence of the human genome, Science, 291, 1304, 2001.
79. Amorim, A. and Pereira, L., Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation:A comparative analysis with STRs, Forensic Sci Int, 150, 17, 2005.
80. Payseur, B. and Cutter, A., Integrating patterns of polymorphism at SNPs and STRs, Trends Genet, 22, 424, 2006.
81. Syvanen, A., Accessing genetic variation: Genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms, Nat Rev Genet, 2, 930, 2001.
82. Tian, H., Jaquins-Gerstl, A., Munro, N., et al., Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis by capillary and microchip electrophoresis: A fast, simple method for detection of common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, Genomics, 63, 25, 2000.
83. Atha, D., Kasprzak, W., O’Connell, C., et al., Prediction of DNAsingle-strand conformation polymorphism:Analysis by capillary electrophoresis and computerized DNA modeling, Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 4643, 2001.
84. Orita, M., Iwahana, H., Kanazawa, H., et al., Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86, 2766, 1989.
85. Fukuda, M. and Tamaki, Y., Subtyping of D11S488 STR alleles by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis in two cases of disputed parentage, Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi, 52, 42, 1998.
86. Tsai, L., Kao, L., Chang, J., et al., Rapid identification of the ABO genotypes by their single-strand conformation polymorphism, Electrophoresis, 21, 537, 2000.
87. Sunnucks, P., Wilson, A., Beheregaray, L., et al., SSCP is not so difficult: The application and utility of single-stranded conformation polymorphism in evolutionary biology and molecular ecology, Mol Ecol, 9, 1699, 2000.
88. Day, A., Nonhuman DNA testing increases DNA’s power to identify and convict criminals, Silent Witness, 6, 2001.
89. Hellmann, A., Rohleder, U., Eichmann, C., et al., A proposal for standardization in forensic canine DNA typing: Allele nomenclature of six canine-specific STR loci, J Forensic Sci, 51, 274-281, 2006.
90. Eichmann, C., Berger, B., and Parson, W., Aproposed nomenclature for 15 canine-specific polymorphic STR loci for forensic purposes, Int J Legal Med, 118, 249, 2004.
91. Sensabaugh, G. and Kaye, D., Non-human DNA evidence, Jurimetrics J, 38, 1, 1998.
92. Eichmann, C., Berger, B., Steinlechner, M., et al., Estimating the probability of identity in a random dog population using 15 highly polymorphic canine STR markers, Forensic Sci Int, 151, 37, 2005.
93. Halverson, J. and Basten, C., A PCR multiplex and database for forensic DNA identification of dogs, J Forensic Sci, 50, 352, 2005.
94. State ofWashington v. Kenneth J. Leuluaialii and Geroge J. Tuilefano, in No. 43507-8-I consolidated with No. 437-1-I, Court of Appeals of the State ofWashington, 2003.
95. Butler, J., David, V., O’Brien, S., et al., The MeowPlex: A new DNA test using tetranucleotide STR markers for the domestic cat, Profiles DNA, 5, 7, 2002.
96. www.appliedbiosystems.com, accessed 12/2006.
97. State of California v. David AlanWesterfield, in Case No. SCD165805, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Central Division, 2002.
98. Braunner, P., Reshef, A., and Gorski, A., DNA profiling of trace evidence-Mitigating evidence in a dog biting case, J Forensic Sci, 46, 1232, 2001.
99. Menotti-Raymond, M., David, V., and O’Brien, S., Pet cat hair implicates murder suspect, Nature, 386, 774, 1997.
100. Giovambattista, G., Ripoli, M., Liron, J., et al., DNA typing in a cattle stealing case, J Forensic Sci, 46, 1484, 2001.
101. Gilmore, S., Peakall, R., and Robertson, J., Short tandem repeat (STR)DNAmarkers are hypervariable and informative in Cannabis sativa: Implications for forensic investigations, Forensic Sci Int, 131, 65, 2003.
102. Hsieh, H., Hou, R., Tsai, L., et al., A highly polymorphic STR locus in Cannabis sativa, Forensic Sci Int, 131, 53, 2003.
103. Yoon, C., Forensic science: Botanical witness for the prosecution, Science, 260, 894, 1993.
104. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., et al., AFLP:Anew technique for DNAfingerprinting, Nucleic Acids Res, 23, 4407, 1995.
105. Coyle, H., Ladd, C., Palmbach, T., et al., The green revolution: Botanical contributions to forensics and drug enforcement, Croat Med J, 42, 340, 2001.
106. Bless, C., Palmeter, H., and M.M., Identification of acer rubrum using amplified fragment length polymorphism, J Forensic Sci, 51, 31, 2006.
107. Budowle, B., Genetics and attribution issues that confront the microbial forensics field, Forensic Sci Int, 146, 185, 2004.
108. Horswell, J., Cordiner, S., Maas, E., et al., Forensic comparison of soils by bacterial community DNA profiling, J Forensic Sci, 47, 350, 2002.
109. Moreno, L., Mills, D., Entry, J., et al., Microbial metagenome profiling using amplicon length heterogeneity-polymerase chain reaction proves more effective than elemental analysis in discriminating soil specimens, J Forensic Sci, 51, 2006.
110. Marsh, T., Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP): An emerging method for characterizing diversity among homologous populations of amplification products, Curr Opin Microbiol, 2, 323-327, 1999.
111. Clement, B., Kehl, L., DeBord, K., et al., Terminal restriction fragment patterns (TRFPs), a rapid, PCR-based method for the comparison of complex bacterial communities, J Microbiol Meth, 31, 135, 1998.
112. Chan, O. C., Yang, X., Fu, Y., et al., 16S rRNA gene analyses of bacterial community structures in the soils of evergreen broad-leaved forests in south-west China, FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 58, 247, 2006.
113. Kvist, T., Ahring, B., Lasken, R., et al., Specific single-cell isolation and genomic amplification of uncultured microorganisms, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 74, 926-935, 2006.
114. Mills, D., Fitzgerald, K., Litchfield, C., et al., A comparison of DNA profiling techniques for monitoring nutrient impact on microbial community composition during bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils, J Microbiol Meth, 54, 57, 2003.
115. Dunbar, J., Ticknor, L., and Kuske, C., Assessment of microbial diversity on four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis, Appl Environ Microbiol, 66, 2943, 2000.