Prediction complements explanation in understanding the developing brain

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Rosenberg, Monica D ^a   Casey, B J ^a   Holmes, Avram J ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COGNITION; NEUROLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITION; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MENTAL DISEASE; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; PREDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; CHILD; COGNITIVE DEFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INDIVIDUALITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; CHILD; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 85042361145     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02887-9     Document Type: Article

References (157)

1. Hofstadter, A. Explanation and necessity. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 11, 339-347 (1951).
2. Shmueli, G. To explain or to predict? Stat. Sci. 25, 289-310 (2010).
3. Craver, C. F. When mechanistic models explain. Synthese 153, 355-376 (2006).
4. Salmon, W. C. Why ask, 'Why?'? An inquiry concerning scientific explanation. Proc. Address. Am. Philos. Assoc. 51, 683-705 (1978).
5. Woo, C.-W., Chang, L. J., Lindquist, M. A. & Wager, T. D. Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 365-377 (2017). Reviews advances in biomarker discovery in human neuroscience.
6. Gabrieli, J. D. E., Ghosh, S. S. & Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron 85, 11-26 (2015). Highlights benefits of predictive brain-based models for personalized medicine and education.
7. Douglas, H. E. Reintroducing prediction to explanation. Philos. Sci. 76, 444-463 (2009).
8. Yarkoni, T. & Westfall, J. Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: lessons from machine learning. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1100-1122 (2017). Argues for an increased focus on prediction over explanation for understanding human behavior.
9. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 137-156 (1988).
10. Price, J. L. & Drevets, W. C. Neurocircuitry of mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 192-216 (2009).
11. Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R. & Schacter, D. L. The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 1-38 (2008).
12. Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201-215 (2002).
13. Power, J. D. et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665-678 (2011).
14. Yeo, B. T. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125-1165 (2011).
15. Insel, T. et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 167, 748-751 (2010).
16. Hyman, S. E. The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 6, 155-179 (2010).
17. Fair, D. A., Bathula, D., Nikolas, M. A. & Nigg, J. T. Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6769-6774 (2012).
18. Casey, B. J., Oliveri, M. E. & Insel, T. A neurodevelopmental perspective on the research domain criteria (RDoC) framework. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 350-353 (2014).
19. Cohen, J. D. et al. Computational approaches to fMRI analysis. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 304-313 (2017).
20. Shen, X. et al. Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity. Nat. Protoc. 12, 506-518 (2017).
21. Lee, F. S. et al. Adolescent mental health-Opportunity and obligation: emerging neuroscience offers hope for treatments. Science 346, 547-549 (2014).
22. Casey, B. J. Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 295-319 (2015). Presents evidence that adolescent-specific changes in self-control emerge from the fine-Tuning of connections within and between subcortical, cortical prefrontal, and limbic circuits.
23. Steinberg, L. Risk taking in adolescence. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 55-59 (2007).
24. Ellis, B. J. et al. The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: implications for science, policy, and practice. Dev. Psychol. 48, 598-623 (2012).
25. Arnett, J. J. Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Pers. Individ. Dif. 20, 693-702 (1996).
26. Greene, K. et al. Targeting adolescent risk-Taking behaviors: The contributions of egocentrism and sensation-seeking. J. Adolesc. 23, 439-461 (2000).
27. Van Leijenhorst, L. et al. What motivates the adolescent? brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence. Cereb. Cortex. 20, 61-69 (2010).
28. Galvan, A. et al. Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-Taking behavior in adolescents. J. Neurosci. 26, 6885-6892 (2006).
29. Somerville, L. H., Hare, T. & Casey, B. J. Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 2123-2134 (2010).
30. Silvers, J. A. et al. Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence. Emotion 12, 1235-1247 (2012).
31. Chein, J., Albert, D., O'Brien, L., Uckert, K. & Steinberg, L. Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. Dev. Sci. 14, F1-F10 (2011).
32. Steinberg, L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-Taking. Dev. Rev. 28, 78-106 (2008).
33. Blakemore, S.-J. & Robbins, T. W. Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1184-1191 (2012).
34. Somerville, L. H. The teenage brain: sensitivity to social evaluation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 121-127 (2013).
35. Spear, L. P. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24, 417-463 (2000).
36. Hartley, C. A. & Lee, F. S. Sensitive periods in affective development: nonlinear maturation of fear learning. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 50-60 (2015).
37. King, E. C., Pattwell, S. S., Sun, A., Glatt, C. E. & Lee, F. S. Nonlinear developmental trajectory of fear learning and memory. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1304, 62-69 (2013).
38. Insel, T. R. & Young, L. J. The neurobiology of attachment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 129-136 (2001).
39. Landers, M. S. & Sullivan, R. M. The development and neurobiology of infant attachment and fear. Dev. Neurosci. 34, 101-114 (2012).
40. Pattwell, S. S. et al. Altered fear learning across development in both mouse and human. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16318-16323 (2012).
41. McCallum, J., Kim, J. H. & Richardson, R. Impaired extinction retention in adolescent rats: effects of D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 2134-2142 (2010).
42. Gee, D. G. et al. Individual differences in frontolimbic circuitry and anxiety emerge with adolescent changes in endocannabinoid signaling across species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4500-4505 (2016).
43. Malter Cohen, M. et al. Early-life stress has persistent effects on amygdala function and development in mice and humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18274-18278 (2013).
44. Gee, D. G. et al. Early developmental emergence of human amygdala-prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15638-15643 (2013).
45. Tottenham, N. et al. Elevated amygdala response to faces following early deprivation. Dev. Sci. 14, 190-204 (2011).
46. Hartley, C. A. & Somerville, L. H. The neuroscience of adolescent decision-making. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 5, 108-115 (2015).
47. van der Schaaf, M. E., Warmerdam, E., Crone, E. A. & Cools, R. Distinct linear and non-linear trajectories of reward and punishment reversal learning during development: relevance for dopamine's role in adolescent decision making. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 578-590 (2011).
48. Teslovich, T. et al. Adolescents let sufficient evidence accumulate before making a decision when large incentives are at stake. Dev. Sci. 17, 59-70 (2014).
49. Somerville, L. H., Jones, R. M. & Casey, B. J. A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain. Cogn. 72, 124-133 (2010).
50. Dreyfuss, M. et al. Teens impulsively react rather than retreat from threat. Dev. Neurosci. 36, 220-227 (2014).
51. Casey, B., Galván, A. & Somerville, L. H. Beyond simple models of adolescence to an integrated circuit-based account: A commentary. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 128-130 (2016).
52. Casey, B., Heller, A. S., Gee, D. G. & Cohen, A. O. Development of the emotional brain. Neurosci. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.11.055 (2017)
53. Bourgeois, J.-P., Goldman-Rakic, P. S. & Rakic, P. Synaptogenesis in the prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkeys. Cereb. Cortex. 4, 78-96 (1994).
54. Huttenlocher, P. R. & Dabholkar, A. S. Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 387, 167-178 (1997).
55. Østby, Y. et al. Heterogeneity in subcortical brain development: A structural magnetic resonance imaging study of brain maturation from 8 to 30 years. J. Neurosci. 29, 11772-11782 (2009).
56. Giedd, J. N. et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 861-863 (1999).
57. Tamnes, C. K. et al. Brain maturation in adolescence and young adulthood: regional age-related changes in cortical thickness and white matter volume and microstructure. Cereb. Cortex. 20, 534-548 (2010).
58. Shaw, P. et al. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 3586 LP-3583594 (2008).
59. Gogtay, N. et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8174-8179 (2004).
60. Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Holmes, C. J., Jernigan, T. L. & Toga, A. W. In vivo evidence for post-Adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 859-861 (1999).
61. Gogtay, N. & Thompson, P. M. Mapping gray matter development: Implications for typical development and vulnerability to psychopathology. Brain. Cogn. 72, 6-15 (2010).
62. Selemon, L. D. A role for synaptic plasticity in the adolescent development of executive function. Transl. Psychiatry 3, e238 (2013).
63. Benes, F. M., Taylor, J. B. & Cunningham, M. C. Convergence and plasticity of monoaminergic systems in the medial prefrontal cortex during the postnatal period: implications for the development of psychopathology. Cereb. Cortex. 10, 1014-1027 (2000).
64. Brenhouse, H. C., Sonntag, K. C. & Andersen, S. L. Transient D1 dopamine receptor expression on prefrontal cortex projection neurons: relationship to enhanced motivational salience of drug cues in adolescence. J. Neurosci. 28, 2375-2382 (2008).
65. Tseng, K. Y. & O'Donnell, P. Dopamine modulation of prefrontal cortical interneurons changes during adolescence. Cereb. Cortex. 17, 1235-1240 (2007).
66. Casey, B. J., Getz, S. & Galvan, A. The adolescent brain. Dev. Rev. 28, 62-77 (2008).
67. Flechsig, P. Anatomie des menschlichen Gehirns und Rückenmarks auf myelogenetischer Grundlage. 121 (1920).
68. Buckner, R. L. & Krienen, F. M. The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 648-665 (2017).
69. Asato, M. R., Terwilliger, R., Woo, J. & Luna, B. White matter development in adolescence: A DTI study. Cereb. Cortex. 20, 2122-2131 (2010).
70. Simmonds, D. J., Hallquist, M. N., Asato, M. & Luna, B. Developmental stages and sex differences of white matter and behavioral development through adolescence: A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Neuroimage 92, 356-368 (2014).
71. Barnea-Goraly, N. et al. White matter development during childhood and adolescence: A cross-sectional diffusion tensor imaging study. Cereb. Cortex. 15, 1848-1854 (2005).
72. Liston, C. et al. Frontostriatal microstructure modulates efficient recruitment of cognitive control. Cereb. Cortex. 16, 553-560 (2006).
73. Power, J. D., Fair, D. A., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. The development of human functional brain networks. Neuron 67, 735-748 (2010).
74. Fair, D. A. et al. The maturing architecture of the brain's default network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4028-4032 (2008).
75. Supekar, K., Musen, M. & Menon, V. Development of large-scale functional brain networks in children. PLOS Biol. 7, e1000157 (2009).
76. Kelly, A. M. C. et al. Development of anterior cingulate functional connectivity from late childhood to early adulthood. Cereb. Cortex. 19, 640-657 (2009).
77. Di Martino, A. et al. Unraveling the miswired connectome: A developmental perspective. Neuron 83, 1335-1353 (2014).
78. Sejnowski, T. J., Churchland, P. S. & Movshon, J. A. Putting big data to good use in neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1440-1441 (2014).
79. Schumann, G. et al. The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology. Mol. Psychiatry 15, 1128-1139 (2010).
80. Van Essen, D. C. et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview. Neuroimage 80, 62-79 (2013).
81. Di Martino, A. et al. The autism brain imaging data exchange: Towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 659-667 (2014).
82. Alexander, L. M. et al. An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders. Sci. Data 4, 170181 (2017).
83. Casey, B. et al. The ABCD Study: functional imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. (in press) (2018).
84. Alfaro-Almagro, F. et al. Image processing and quality control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank. Neuroimage 166, 400-424 (2018).
85. Noble, S. et al. Influences on the test-retest reliability of functional connectivity MRI and its relationship with behavioral utility. Cereb. Cortex. 27, 1-15 (2017).
86. Noble, S. et al. Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity. Neuroimage 146, 959-970 (2017).
87. Miller, K. L. et al. Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1523-1536 (2016).
88. Dosenbach, N. U. F. et al. Real-Time motion analytics during brain MRI improve data quality and reduce costs. Neuroimage 161, 80-93 (2017).
89. Bzdok, D. & Yeo, B. T. T. Inference in the age of big data: Future perspectives on neuroscience. Neuroimage 155, 549-564 (2017). Suggests statistical tools useful for analyzing big data in human neuroscience.
90. Dubois, J. & Adolphs, R. Building a science of individual differences from fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 425-443 (2016).
91. Finn, E. S. & Constable, R. T. Individual variation in functional brain connectivity: implications for personalized approaches to psychiatric disease. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 18, 277-287 (2016).
92. Jollans, L. & Whelan, R. The clinical added value of imaging: A perspective from outcome prediction. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 1, 423-432 (2016).
93. Box, G. E. P. in Robustness in Statistics (eds Launer, R. & Wilderson, G.) 201-236 (Academic Press, New York, 1979).
94. Finn, E. S. et al. Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? Neuroimage 160, 140-151 (2017).
95. Cohen, A. O. & Casey, B. J. Rewiring juvenile justice: The intersection of developmental neuroscience and legal policy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 63-65 (2014).
96. Cohen, A. O. et al When is an adolescent an adult? assessing cognitive control in emotional and nonemotional contexts. Psychol. Sci. 27, 549-562 (2016). Provides evidence for a shift in cognitive capacity in emotional contexts that accompanies dynamic changes in prefrontal circuitry during adolescence.
97. Rudolph, M. D. et al At risk of being risky: The relationship between 'brain age' under emotional states and risk preference. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 93-106 (2017). Shows that, on average, adolescents' functional connectivity profiles look younger in emotional contexts, and that young adults who maintain this profile show riskier choices.
98. Rosenberg, M. D., Finn, E. S., Scheinost, D., Constable, R. T. & Chun, M. M. Characterizing attention with predictive network models. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 290-302 (2017).
99. Van Essen, D. C. & Glasser, M. F. The Human Connectome Project: progress and prospects. Cerebrum 2016, 10-16 (2016).
100. Holmes, A. J. et al Brain Genomics Superstruct Project initial data release with structural, functional, and behavioral measures. Sci. Data 2, 150031 (2015). Details the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project repository, which includes neuroimaging and self-report behavioral and cognitive data from 1,570 adult participants.
101. Poldrack, R. A. et al. Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Front. Neuroinf. 7, 12 (2013).
102. Miranda-Domínguez, Ó. et al. Heritability of the human connectome: A connectotyping study. Netw. Neurosci. 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1162/NETN-A-00029 (2017).
103. Rosenberg, M. D. et al. A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 165-171 (2016). Introduces a model that generalizes across datasets to predict sustained attention from task-based and resting-state functional connectivity.
104. Rosenberg, M. D. et al. Methylphenidate modulates functional network connectivity to enhance attention. J. Neurosci. 36, 9547-9557 (2016).
105. Yoo, K. et al. Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets. Neuroimage 167, 11-22 (2018).
106. Jangraw, D. C. et al. A functional connectivity-based neuromarker of sustained attention generalizes to predict recall in a reading task. Neuroimage 166, 99-109 (2018).
107. Rosenberg, M. D. et al. Connectome-based fMRI models predict separable components of attention in novel individuals. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 160-173 (2018).
108. The ADHD-200 Consortium. The ADHD-200 consortium: A model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 62 (2012).
109. Castellanos, F. X. et al. Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288, 1740-1748 (2002).
110. Casey, B. J., Nigg, J. T., Durston, S. New potential leads in the biology and treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 20, 119-124 (2007).
111. Lorenz, E. N. Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. Scientific Report No. 1. Statistical Forecasting Project, Dept. of Meteorology, MIT (1956).
112. Shaw, P. et al. Development of cortical surface area and gyrification in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 72, 191-197 (2012).
113. Shaw, P. et al Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19649-19654 (2007). Provides evidence for delayed cortical thickness maturation in ADHD.
114. Fair, D. A. et al. Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 80 (2012).
115. Pardoe, H. R., Kucharsky Hiess, R. & Kuzniecky, R. Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations. Neuroimage 135, 177-185 (2016).
116. Couvy-Duchesne, B. et al. Head motion and inattention/hyperactivity share common genetic influences: implications for fMRI studies of ADHD. PLoS ONE 11, e0146271 (2016).
117. Engelhardt, L. E. et al. Children's head motion during fMRI tasks is heritable and stable over time. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 25, 58-68 (2017).
118. Kessler, T., Angstadt, M. & Sripada, C. Growth charting of brain connectivity networks and the identification of attention impairment in youth. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 481-489 (2016).
119. Kaufmann, T. et al Delayed stabilization and individualization in connectome development are related to psychiatric disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 513-515 (2017). Demonstrates that functional connectivity patterns become more stable and unique during adolescence, and that delays in this pattern of development are related to psychiatric symptoms.
120. Albert, P. S. A linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects misspecification. Stat. Med. 31, 143-154 (2012).
121. Liu, D. & Albert, P. S. Combination of longitudinal biomarkers in predicting binary events. Biostatistics 15, 706-718 (2014).
122. Sweeting, M. J. & Thompson, S. G. Making predictions from complex longitudinal data, with application to planning monitoring intervals in a national screening programme. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A. Stat. Soc. 175, 569-586 (2012).
123. Li, L., Luo, S., Hu, B. & Greene, T. Dynamic prediction of renal failure using longitudinal biomarkers in a cohort study of chronic kidney disease. Stat. Biosci. 9, 357-378 (2016).
124. Whelan, R. et al Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers. Nature 512, 185-189 (2014). Predicts future alcohol misuse from neural, behavioral, environmental, and genetic data in a large sample of adolescents.
125. Emerson, R. W. et al. Functional neuroimaging of high-risk 6-month-old infants predicts a diagnosis of autism at 24 months of age. Sci. Transl. Med. 9 eaag2882 (2017).
126. Hazlett, H. C. et al. Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. Nature 542, 348-351 (2017).
127. Plitt, M., Barnes, K. A., Wallace, G. L., Kenworthy, L. & Martin, A. Resting-state functional connectivity predicts longitudinal change in autistic traits and adaptive functioning in autism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6699-E6706 (2015).
128. Hoeft, F. et al. Neural systems predicting long-Term outcome in dyslexia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 361-366 (2011).
129. Dosenbach, N. U. F. et al. Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 329, 1358-1361 (2010). Predicted chronological age from functional connectivity patterns in the first example of predictive modeling in developmental cognitive neuroscience.
130. Brown, T. T. et al. Neuroanatomical assessment of biological maturity. Curr. Biol. 22, 1693-1698 (2012).
131. Franke, K., Luders, E., May, A., Wilke, M. & Gaser, C. Brain maturation: predicting individual BrainAGE in children and adolescents using structural MRI. Neuroimage 63, 1305-1312 (2012).
132. Altman, D. G. & Royston, P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 332, 1080 (2006).
133. Austin, P. C. & Brunner, L. J. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistics regression analyses. Statist. Med. 23, 1159-1178 (2004).
134. Castellanos, F. X., Di Martino, A., Craddock, R. C., Mehta, A. D. & Milham, M. P. Clinical applications of the functional connectome. Neuroimage 80, 527-540 (2013).
135. Hudziak, J. J., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R. & Pine, D. S. A dimensional approach to developmental psychopathology. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 16, S16-S23 (2007).
136. Finn, E. S. et al. Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1664-1671 (2015).
137. Smith, S. M. et al. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 666-682 (2013).
138. Ferguson, M. A., Anderson, J. S. & Spreng, R. N. Fluid and flexible minds: intelligence reflects synchrony in the brain's intrinsic network architecture. Netw. Neurosci. 1, 192-207 (2017).
139. Poole, V. N. et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity predicts individual differences in distractibility. Neuropsychologia 86, 176-182 (2016).
140. Supekar, K. et al. Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8230-8235 (2013).
141. AM, C. Bigger data, harder questions-opportunities throughout mental health care. JAMA Psychiatry 74, 1183-1184 (2017).
142. Smith, S. et al A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1565-1567 (2015). Identifies a pattern of functional brain connectivity related to a 'positive-negative' axis of lifestyle, demographic and psychometric factors.
143. Ciric, R. et al Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity. Neuroimage 154, 174-187 (2017). Compares current methods for controlling for motion artifacts in functional connectivity data.
144. Swanson, J. M. The UK Biobank and selection bias. Lancet 380, 110 (2017).
145. Chekroud, A. M. & Koutsouleris, N. The perilous path from publication to practice. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 24-25 (2017).
146. MP, P. Evidence-based pragmatic psychiatry-a call to action. JAMA Psychiatry 74, 1185-1186 (2017).
147. Guyon, I. & Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157-1182 (2003).
148. Kievit, R. et al. Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. (2017).
149. Brown, S. A. et al. The National Consortium on Alcohol and NeuroDevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA): A multisite study of adolescent development and substance use. J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 76, 895-908 (2015).
150. Jernigan, T. L. et al. The pediatric imaging, neurocognition, and genetics (PING) data repository. Neuroimage 124, 1149-1154 (2016).
151. Satterthwaite, T. D. et al. The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth. Neuroimage 124, 1115-1119 (2016).
152. Pausova, Z. et al. Genes, maternal smoking, and the offspring brain and body during adolescence: design of the Saguenay Youth Study. Hum. Brain. Mapp. 28, 502-518 (2007).
153. Salum, G. A. et al. High risk cohort study for psychiatric disorders in childhood: rationale, design, methods and preliminary results. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 24, 58-73 (2015).
154. Thompson, P. M. et al. The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data. Brain. Imaging Behav. 8, 153-182 (2014).
155. Kooijman, M. N. et al. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2017. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 31, 1243-1264 (2016).
156. von Rhein, D. et al. The NeuroIMAGE study: A prospective phenotypic, cognitive, genetic and MRI study in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Design and descriptives. Eur. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 24, 265-281 (2015).
157. Zuo, X. N. et al. An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci. Data 1, 140049 (2014).