Qualitative assessment of the primary care outcomes questionnaire: A cognitive interview study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Murphy, Mairead ^a   Hollinghurst, Sandra ^a   Salisbury, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive interviews; Face validity; Family practice; Patient satisfaction; Patient Centred care; Patient reported outcomes; Primary care; Questionnaires; Think aloud; Verbal probing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPMENT; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS;

ADULT; AGED; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85041608166     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2867-6     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, et al. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):223-8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.272. [published Online First: 2005/06/02]
2. Olayiwola JN, Anderson D, Jepeal N, et al. Electronic consultations to improve the primary care-specialty care Interface for cardiology in the medically underserved: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(2):133-40. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1869.
3. Sharma AE, Willard-Grace R, Hessler D, et al. What happens after health coaching? Observational study 1 year following a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(3):200-7. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1924.
4. Barnes R. ISRCTN registry: footprints in primary care. 24/06/2015 ed, 2015.
5. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? J Am Med Assoc. 1988;260(12):1743-8.
6. Fitzpatrick R. Patient-reported outcomes and performance measurement. In: Smith P, Mossialos M, Leatherman S, et al., editors. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and Prospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 63-86.
7. Salisbury C, Procter S, Stewart K, et al. The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(616):751-9. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X674431.
8. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83.
9. EuroQol BR. The current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53-72.
10. Venning P, Durie A, Roland M, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ. 2000;320(7241):1048-53.
11. RK MK, Cragg DK, Hastings AM, et al. Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: the outcome of care. BMJ. 1997;314(7075):190-3.
12. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ 1996;312(7037):1016-1020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1016
13. Paterson C. University of Bristol website, PHC section, MYMOP: University of Bristol; 2012 [Available from: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/primaryhealthcare/resources/mymop/strengthsandweaknesses/ Accessed 25 Apr 2014.
14. Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, et al. A comparison of a patient enablement instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15(2):165-71.
15. Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, et al. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. Br Med J. 1999;319(7212):738-43. [published Online First: 1999/09/17]
16. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2008.
17. Valderas JM, Fitzpatrick R, Roland M. Using health status to measure NHS performance: another step into the dark for the health reform in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(4):352-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000184.
18. Murphy M, Salisbury C, Hollinghurst S. Can the outcome of primary care be measured by a patient reported outcome measure? Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(629):647-8. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X683017.
19. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):1889-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y.
20. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
21. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, et al. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i-iv. 1-74
22. Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Turner K, et al. Patient and practitioners' views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9.
23. Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Salisbury C. Agreeing the content of a patient-reported outcome measure for primary care: a Delphi consensus study. Health Expect. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12462.
24. Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Cowlishaw S, et al. Psychometric testing of the primary care outcomes questionnaire. Br J Gen Prac Pending publ. 2018; https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X683017.
25. Ruger JP. Health capability: conceptualization and operationalization. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(1):41-9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.143651.
26. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. Br Med J. 2013;346:f167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f167. [published Online First: 2013/01/30]
27. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70.
28. Reilly D, Mercer SW, Bikker AP, et al. Outcome related to impact on daily living: preliminary validation of the ORIDL instrument. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:139.
29. Haddad S, Potvin L, Roberge D, et al. Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit. Fam Pract. 2000;17(1):21-9.
30. Knäuper B, Carrière K, Chamandy M, et al. How aging affects self-reports. Euro J Ageing. 2016;13(2):185-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0369-0.
31. Choi BC, Pak AW. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(1):A13.
32. Watt T, Rasmussen AK, Groenvold M, et al. Improving a newly developed patient-reported outcome for thyroid patients, using cognitive interviewing. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(7):1009-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9364-z.
33. Willis G. Cognitive interviewing - a how to guide: Research Triangle Institute, 1999.
34. Beatty P. The dynamics of cognitive interviewing. In: Presser S, editor. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons. p. xvi-2004. 606 p.
35. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(1):167-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9927-2.
36. Al-Janabi H, Keeley T, Mitchell P, et al. Can capabilities be self-reported? A think aloud study. Soc Sci Med. 2013;87:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.035.
37. Matza LS, Boye KS, Stewart KD, et al. A qualitative examination of the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0373-7.
38. Tourangeau R. Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In: Jabine T, Straf M, Tanur J, et al., editors. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1984. p. 73-100.
39. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
40. Horwood J, Pollard B, Ayis S, et al. Listening to patients: using verbal data in the validation of the Aberdeen measures of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction (Ab-IAP). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-182.
41. Mallinson S. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the short-form 36 health status questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(1):11-21.
42. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171-8.
43. Mc Dowell I. Measuring health. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
44. Ware J. Scales for measuring general health perceptions. Health Serv Res. 1976;11:396-415.
45. Herrmann D. Reporting current, past, and changed health status. What we know about distortion. Med Care. 1995;33(4 Suppl):AS89-94.
46. Guyatt GH, Norman GR, Juniper EF, et al. A critical look at transition ratings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(9):900-8.
47. Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61058-8.
48. Salisbury C, Montgomery AA, Hollinghurst S, et al. Effectiveness of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2013;346:f43. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f43. (jan29 3)
49. Saldana J. Chapter 1: an introduction to codes and coding. In: SAGE Publications, editor. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE publications; 2009.
50. Conrad FG, Blair J. Data quality in cognitive interviews: the case of verbal reports. In: Presser S, editor. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. p. xvi. 606 p.
51. Lozano LM, García-Cueto E, Muñiz J. Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology. 2008;4(2):73-9. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73.
52. Horwood J, Sutton E, Coast J. Evaluating the face validity of the ICECAP-O capabilities measure: a "think aloud" study with hip and knee Arthroplasty patients. Appl Res Qual Life. 2013;9(3):667-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9264-4