Listening to patients: Using verbal data in the validation of the Aberdeen Measures of Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction (Ab-IAP)

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Horwood, Jeremy ^a   Pollard, Beth ^b   Ayis, Salma ^c   McIlvenna, Teresa ^d   Johnston, Marie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABERDEEN MEASURES OF IMPAIRMENT, ACTIVITY LIMITATION AND PARTICIPATION RESTRICTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERVIEW; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOMETRY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY LIMITATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77955382376     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-182     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Measuring the ICF components of Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction: an item analysis using classical test theory and item response theory. B Pollard D Dixon P Dieppe M Johnston, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2009 7 41 10.1186/1477-7525-7-41 19422677
2. WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, World Health Organization 2001
3. What Do Osteoarthritis Health Outcome Instruments Measure? Impairment, Activity Limitation, or Participation Restriction? B Pollard M Johnston P Dieppe, Journal of Rheumatology 2006 33 757 763 16358368
4. The use of cognitive interviewing techniques in quality-of-life and patient-reported outcomes assessment. G Willis B Reeve I Barofsky, Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications Cambridge University Press, Lipscomb J, Gotay C, Snyder C, 2005 610 622
5. Questionnaire surveys in medical research. A Mandal J Eaden M Mayberry J Mayberry, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical practice 2000 6 395 403 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00263.x 11133122
6. Use of cognitive interviewing to adapt measurement instruments for low-literate Hispanics. M Rosal E Carbone K Goins, Diabetes Educ 2003 29 1006 1017 10.1177/014572170302900611 14692374
7. K Ericsson H Simon, Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 1993
8. GB Willis, Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 2005
9. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. S Mallinson, Social Science & Medicine 2002 54 11 21
10. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pre-testing of questionnaires. J Drennan, Journal of Advanced Nursing 2003 42 57 63 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.x 12641812
11. Methods for pre-testing and piloting survey questions: illustrations from the KENQOL survey of health-related quality of life. A Bowden J Fox-Rushby L Nyandieka J Wanjau, Health Policy Plan 2002 17 322 330 10.1093/heapol/17.3.322 12135999
12. What do people think about when they answer theory of planned behaviour questionnaires? A 'think aloud' study. D French R Cooke N McLean M Williams S Sutton, Journal of Health Psychology 2007 12 672 687 10.1177/1359105307078174 17584818
13. The MS Symptom and Impact Diary (MSSID): psychometric evaluation of a new instrument to measure the day to day impact of multiple sclerosis. J Greenhalgh H Ford A Long K Hurst, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004 75 577 582 10.1136/jnnp.2003.020529
14. The value of cognitive interviewing techniques in palliative care research. F Murtagh J Addington-Hall I igginson, Palliative Medicine 2007 21 87 93 10.1177/0269216306075367 17344256
15. Cognitive Sciences and survey methods. R Tourangeau, Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines Washington DC: National Academy Press, Jabine T, Straf M, Tanur J, Tourangeau R, 1984
16. ti Atlas, Computer software Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH 2005
17. The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis. B Glaser A Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research Chicago: ALDINE Publishing Company, Glaser B, Strauss A, 1967 101 158
18. Office for National Statistics, Standard Occupational Classification London: The Stationary Office 2000
19. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. J Landis G Koch, Biometrics 1977 33 159 174 10.2307/2529310 843571
20. Interpreting Verbal Reports in Cognitive Interviews: Probes Matter. F Conrad J Blair, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association 2001, August 5-9
21. E Martin, Survey questionnaire construction Washington, D.C: U.S. Census Bureau 2006
22. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment. E McColl K Meadows I Barofsky, Quality of Life Research 2003 12 217 218 10.1023/A:1023233432721 12769133
23. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. MAG Sprangers CE Schwartz, Social Science & Medicine 1999 48 1507 1515
24. Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. A Williams H Davies Y Chadury, Pain 2000 85 463 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00299-7
25. Scaling the affective domain of pain: a study of the dimensionality of verbal descriptors. S Morley V Pallin, Pain 1995 62 39 49 10.1016/0304-3959(94) 00226-5 7478707
26. S Horn M Munafo, Pain: Theory, Research, and Intervention Buckingham: Open University Press 1997
27. Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities. R Barcley-Goddard J Epstein, Quality of Life Research 2009 18 335 346 10.1007/s11136-009-9450-x 19241143
28. The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift. C Schwartz R Bode N Repucci J Becker M Sprangers P Fayers, Quality of Life Research 2006 15 1533 1550 10.1007/s11136-006-0025-9 17031503
29. 'Questerviews': using questionnaires in qualitative interviews as a method of integrating qualitative and quantitative health services research. J Adamson R Gooberman-Hill G Woolhead J Donovan, Journal of Health Service Research Policy 2004 9 139 145 10.1258/1355819041403268
30. J Rothgeb G Willis B Forsyth, Questionnaire Pretesting Methods: Do Different Techniques and Different Organizations Produce Similar Results? Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau 2005
31. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. D Collins, Quality of Life Research 2003 12 229 238 10.1023/A:1023254226592 12769135