The content of general practice consultations: Cross-sectional study based on video recordings

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 63, Issue 616, 2013, Pages

  Salisbury, Chris ^a   Procter, Sunita ^a   Stewart, Kate ^a   Bowen, Leah ^a   Purdy, Sarah ^a   Ridd, Matthew ^a   Valderas, Jose ^b   Blakeman, Tom ^c   Reeves, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Consultation; Family practice; General practice; Office visits; Video recording

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887308016     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X674431     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. The King's Fund. Improving the quality of care in general practice. London: The King's Fund, 2011. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/ improving-quality-care-general-practice (accessed 1 Oct 2013).
2. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, et al. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(2): 181-190.
3. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, et al. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61(582): DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X548929.
4. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases. JAMA 2005; 294(6): 716-724. (Pubitemid 41159291)
5. Hughes LD, McMurdo MET, Guthrie B. Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity. Age Ageing 2012; 42(1): 62-69.
6. Stott NC, Davis RH. The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979; 29: 201-205.
7. Bower P, Macdonald W, Harkness E, et al. Multimorbidity, service organization and clinical decision making in primary care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2011; 28(5): 579-587.
8. McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity Statistics from general practice. Fourth national study 1991-1992. Series MB5 no.3. London: HMSO, 1995.
9. Britt HC, Harrison CM, Miller GC, Knox SA. Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in Australia. Med J Aust 2008; 189(2): 72-77.
10. Laux G, Kuehlein T, Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J. Co- and multimorbidity patterns in primary care based on episodes of care: results from the German CONTENT project. BMC Health Services Research 2008; 8(1): 14.
11. Beasley JW, Hankey TH, Erickson R, et al. How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(5): 405-410. (Pubitemid 39421106)
12. Britt HC, Valenti L, Miller GC. Determinants of consultation length in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 2005; 183(2): 68-71. (Pubitemid 41065346)
13. Pan Y, Britt H, Charles J. Multiple chronic problems. Aust Fam Physician 2009; 38(1-2): 9.
14. Bindman AB, Forrest CB, Britt H, et al. Diagnostic scope of and exposure to primary care physicians in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States: cross sectional analysis of results from three national surveys. BMJ 2007; 334(7606): 1261.
15. Flocke SA, Frank SH, Wenger DA. Addressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit. J Fam Pract 2001; 50(3): 211-216. (Pubitemid 32225274)
16. Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC, Langa D, Flocke SA. Trade-offs in high-volume primary care practice. J Fam Pract 1998; 46(5): 397-402. (Pubitemid 28223911)
17. Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, et al. Illuminating the 'black box'. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Pract 1998; 46(5): 377-389. (Pubitemid 28223909)
18. Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res 2007; 42(5): 1871-1894. (Pubitemid 47397177)
19. English Indices of Deprivation 2010. http://data.gov.uk/dataset/index-of- multiple-deprivation (accessed 22 September 2013).
20. Classification Committee of the World Organisation of Family Doctors. ICPC-2: International Classification of Primary Care. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
21. Williams RL. A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster-Correlated Data. Biometrics 2000; 56(2): 645-646. (Pubitemid 30422662)
22. Cleveland WS. Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74(368): 829-836.
23. Herrett E, Thomas SL, Schoonen WM, et al. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 69(1): 4-14.
24. Salisbury C, Chalder M, Scott TM, et al. National Walk-In Centre Evaluation Team. What is the role of walk-in centres in the NHS? BMJ 2002; 324(7334): 399-402. (Pubitemid 34163905)
25. Levenstein JH, McCracken EC, McWhinney IR, et al. The Patient-centred clinical method. 1. A Model for the doctor-patient interaction in family medicine. Fam Pract 1986; 3(1): 24-30. (Pubitemid 16133303)
26. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, et al. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ 2000; 320(7244): 1246-1250. (Pubitemid 30240475)
27. Campion PD, Butler NM, Cox AD. Principle agendas of doctors and patients in general practice consultations. Fam Pract 1992; 9(2): 181-190.
28. Kahn N. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(1): 29.