The trade and conflict debate: A survey of theory, evidence and future research

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-49

  Reuveny, Rafael ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041051137     PISSN: 10792457     EISSN: 15548597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1554-8597.1030     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Achen, C. (1986), “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Unbiased Aggregation of Cross Sectional Regressions,” Presented at the Third Annual Methodology Conference, Cambridge, MA, August 7-10.
2. Aitken, Norman D. (1973), “The Effect of EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis,” American Economic Review, 63: 881-892.
3. Anderton, C. H., R. A. Anderton and J. Carter (1999), “Economic Activity in the Shadow of Conflict,” Economic Inquiry, 37: 166-179.
4. Angell, Norman (1911), The Great Illusion; A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to their Economic and Social Advantage, New York: Putnam.
5. Arad, Ruth, Seev Hirsch, and Alfred Tovias (1983), The Economics of Peacemaking: Focus on the Egyptian-Israeli Situation, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6. Ashley, Richard (1980), The Political Economy of War and Peace: The Sino-Soviet-American Triangle and the Modern Security Problematique, London: Frances Pinter.
7. Baldwin, D. (1985), Economic Statecraft, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8. Baldwin, David A. (ed.) (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, Columbia University Press: New York.
9. Barbieri, Katherine (1996), “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?" Journal of Peach Research, 33: 29-49.
10. Barbieri, Katherine and Jack Levy (1999), “Sleeping with the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade,” Journal of Peace Research, 36: 463-479.
11. Bennet, Marlin Renee, Alan Rosenblatt, and Jianxin Wang (1992), “The Visible Hand: The United States, Japan, and the Management of Trade Disputes,” International Interactions, 17: 191-213.
12. Bergeijk, Peter A. G. (1994), Economic Diplomacy, Trade, and Commercial Policy: Positive and Negative Sanctions in a New World Order, Vermont: Edward Elgar.
13. Blainey, G. (1973), The Causes of War, New York: Free Press.
14. Borrus, M. and J. Zysman (1992), “Industrial Competitiveness and American National Security,” in W. Sandholtz et al., The Highest Stakes: The Economic Foundations of the Next Security System, 7-52, New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Boulding, Kenneth E. (1962), Conflict and Defense: A General Theory, Harper: New York.
16. Brada, Josef C., and Jose A. Mendez (1985), “Economic Integration Among Developed, Developing and Centrally Planned Economies: A Comparative Analysis,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67: 449-556.
17. Burton, John H. (1946), Life and Correspondence of David Hume, Vol. II, William Tate Publishers: Edinburgh.
18. Buzan, B. (1984), “Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case,” International Organization 38: 597-624.
19. Choucri, N. and R. North (1975), Nations in Conflict, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
20. Copeland, D. C. (1996), “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations,” International Security, 20: 5-41.
21. Dixon, William J. and Bruce E. Moon (1993), “Political Similarity and American Trade Patterns,” Political Research Quarterly, 46: 5-25.
22. Domke, William K., (1988), War and the Changing Global System, New Haven: Yale University Press.
23. Doyle, M. (1997), Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: Norton.
24. Feld, Warner (1979), “Global Allies or Competitors: U.S. Policy Toward an Ascendant European Community and Japan,” in Charles E. Kegley Jr. and Pat McGowan (eds.) Challenges to America: U.S. Foreign Policy in the 1980‘s, Beverly Hills: Sage, 171-200.
25. Gasiorowski, Mark J. (1986), “Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: Some Cross-National Evidence,” International Studies Quarterly, 30: 23-38.
26. Gasiorowski, Mark J. and Solomon W. Polachek (1982), “Conflict and Interdependence: East West Trade and Linkages in the Era of Detente,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 26: 709-729.
27. Gowa, Joanne (1994), Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Granger, C. W. J. (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods,” Econometrica, 37: 424-438.
29. Grieco, J. M. (1988), “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42: 485-529.
30. Grossman, H. I. and M. Kim (1995), “Swords or Plowshares? A Theory of the Security of Claims to Property,” Journal of Political Economy, 103: 275-288.
31. Hirschman, Albert (1980) [1945], National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Hirshleifer, J. (1988), “The Analytics of Continuing Conflict,” Synthese, 76: 201-233.
33. Hirshleifer, J. (1995), “Anarchy and its Breakdown,” Journal of Political Economy, 103: 15-40.
34. Hobson, J. (1965) [1902], Imperialism: A Study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35. Holsti, Kal J. (1986), “Politics in Command: Foreign Trade as National Security Policy,” International Organization, 40: 643-671.
36. Hufbauer, G. C., J. J. Schott, and K. A. Eliott (1990), Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy, Washington: Institute for International Economics.
37. Isard, Walter and Charles H. Anderton (1999), “Survey of the Peace Economics Literature: Recent Key Contributions and a Comprehensive Coverage Up to 1992,” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 5: 1-93.
38. Kang, Heejoon and Rafael Reuveny (2000), “Exploring Multi-Country Dynamic Interrelationships between Trade and Conflict,” presented at Allied Social Science Association, Boston, MA, January 7-9, 2000, and at Peace Science Society (International), Ann Arbor, MI, October 8-10, 1999.
39. Kant, Immanuel (1983) [1795], Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Morals, Indianapolis: Hackett.
40. Kegely, Charles W. JR. (ed.) (1995), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenges, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41. Kennedy, Paul (1995), “Too Serious a Business: A Reply to Professor Krugman,” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 2: 16-22.
42. Keohane, R. O. and J. S. Nye (1977), Power and Interdependence, Boston: Little Brown.
43. Keynes, J. M. (1919), The Economic Consequences of Peace, London: Macmillan.
44. Kim, Soo Yeon (1998), Ties That Bind: The Role of Trade in International Conflict Processes, 1950-1992,” Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Yale University.
45. Kindleberger, C. P. (1970), Power and Money: The Economics of International Politics and the Politics of International Economics, New York: Basic Books.
46. Krugman, Paul (1995), “A Reply,” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 2: 26-30.
47. Kunimoto, K. (1977), “A Topology of Trade Intensity Indices,” Hitsubashi Journal of Economics, 17: 15-32.
48. Lenin, Vladimir (1939) [1916], Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, New York: International Publishers.
49. Levy, Jack (1989), “The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence,” in P. E. Tetlock, J. L. Husbands, R. Jervis, P. C. Stern and C. Tilly (eds.) Behavior, Society and Nuclear War, Vol 1., New York: Oxford University Press, 209-333.
50. de Montesquieu, Baron (1900), The Spirit of Laws, Collier Press, New York.
51. Mansfield, Edward D. (1994), Power, Trade, and War, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. Mastanduno, Michael (1991), “Do Relative Gains Matter? America’s Response to Japanese Industrial Policy,” International Security, 16: 73-113.
53. McMillan, S. M. (1997), “Interdependence and Conflict,” Mershon International Studies Review, 41: 33-58.
54. Mill, John Stuart (1970) [1848], Principles of Political Economy, Baltimore: Penguin Books.
55. Moon, Bruce E. (1985), “Consensus or Compliance? Foreign-Policy Change and External Dependence,” International Organization, 39: 297-329.
56. Morrow, J. D. (1997), “When do ‘Relative Gains’ Impede Trade?" Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 12-37.
57. Morrow, J. D., R. D. Siverson and Tabares (1998), “The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers 1907-1990,” American Political Science Review, 92: 649-661.
58. Nagy, Andras (1983), “The Treatment of International Trade in Global Markets,” International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Working Papers, WP-83-25: Laxenburg, Austria.
59. Oneal, John R., Frances H. Oneal, Zeev Maoz, and Bruce Russett (1996), “The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-1985,” Journal of Peace Research, 33: 11-28.
60. Oneal, John R. and Bruce Russett (1997), “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985,” International Studies Quarterly, 41: 267-294.
61. Papayoanou, P. A. (1996), “Interdependence, Institutions, and the Balance of Power: Britain, Germany, and World War I,” International Security, 20: 42-76.
62. Park, Tong, Farid Abolfathi, and Michael Ward (1976), “Resource Nationalism in Foreign Policy Behavior of Oil Exporting Countries,” International Interactions, 2: 247-62.
63. Parrott, B. (1985), (ed.), Trade Technology and Soviet American Relations, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
64. Patchen, Martin (1990), “Conflict and Cooperation in American-Soviet Relations: What Have We Learned from Quantitative Research?" International Interactions 17: 127-143.
65. Polachek, S. W. (1980), “Conflict and Trade,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24: 55-78.
66. Polachek, S. W. (1992), “Conflict and Trade: An Economics Approach to Political International Interactions,” W. Isard and C. Anderton (eds.) Economics of Arms Reduction, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
67. Polachek, S. W. (1997), “Why Democracies Cooperation More and Fight Less: The Relationship Between International Trade and Cooperation,” Review of International Economics, 5: 295-309.
68. Polachek, S. W. and J. A. McDonald (1992), “Strategic Trade and the Incentive for Cooperation,” in M. Chatterji and L. R. Forcey, eds., Disarmament, Economic Conversion, and Management of Peace, Westport: Praeger, 273-284.
69. Pollins, B. M. (1989a), “Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce: The Effect of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows,” American Journal of Political Science, 33: 737-761.
70. Pollins B. M. (1989b), “Does Trade Still Follow the Flag?" American Political Science Review, 83: 465-480.
71. Rapkin, David R. and Jonathan Strand (1996), “Is International Competitiveness a Meaningful Concept?" in C. Roe Goddard, John T. Passe-Smith and John G. Conklin (eds.), International Political Economy: State-Market Relations in the Changing World Order, Boulder: Lynne Rinner, 109-129.
72. Read, D. (1967), Cobden and Bright: A Victorian Political Partnership, London: Edward Arnold
73. Reuveny, Rafael (2000a), “Bilateral Import, Export and Political Conflict Simultaneity,” presented at American Political Science Association, Midwest, Chicago, IL, April 15-17, 1999 and at Western Economic Association International, San Diego, CA, July 6-10, 1999.
74. Reuveny, Rafael (2000b), “Disaggregated Trade and Conflict: Exploring Propositions in a Simultaneous Framework,” presented at Allied Social Science Association Boston, MA, January 7-9, 2000 and at American Political Science Association, Midwest, Chicago, IL, April 27-30, 2000.
75. Reuveny, Rafael and Heejoon Kang (1996), “International Conflict and Cooperation: Splicing COPDAB and WEIS Series,” International Studies Quarterly, 40: 281-306.
76. Reuveny, Rafael and Heejoon Kang, (1998), “Bilateral Trade and Political Conflict/Cooperation: Do Goods Matter?" Journal of Peace Research, 35: 581-602.
77. Reuveny, Rafael and John Maxwell (1998), “Free Trade and Arms Races,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42: 771-803.
78. Reuveny, Rafael and Heejoon Kang (2000), “A Simultaneous Equations Model of Bilateral Trade Value, Conflict, and Cooperation,” Working Paper, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
79. Richardson, L. F. (1960), Arms and Insecurity, Chicago: Quadrangle.
80. Richardson, Neil R. and Charles W. Kegley (1980), “Trade Dependence and Foreign Policy Compliance: A Longitudinal Analysis,” International Studies Quarterly, 24: 191-222
81. Ripsman, Norrin M. and Jean-Marc F. Blanchard (1997), “Commercial Liberalism Under Fire” Evidence from 1914 and 1936,” Security Studies, 6: 4-50.
82. Roeder, Philip G. (1985), “The Ties that Bind: Aid, Trade, and Political Compliance in Soviet Third World Relations,” International Studies Quarterly, 29: 191-216.
83. Roemer, J. E. (1977), “The Effects of Sphere of Influence and Economic Distance on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactures,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59: 318-327.
84. Sapir, Andre (1981), “Trade Benefits Under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences,” European Economic Review, 15: 339-355.
85. Savage, I. R. and K. W. Deutsch (1960), “A Statistical Model of the Gross Analysis of Transaction Flows,” Econometrica, 28: 551-572.
86. Sayrs, L. (1989), “Trade and Conflict Revisited: Do Politics Matter?" International Interaction, 14: 155-75.
87. Sayrs, L. (1990), “Expected Utility and Peace Science: An Assessment of Trade and Conflict,” Conflict Management and Peace Science, 11: 17-44.
88. Schumpeter (1950), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Raw.
89. Sen, G. (1984), The Military Origins of Industrialization and International Trade Rivalry, New York: St. Martin.
90. Skaperdas, S. and C. Syropoulos (1996), “Competitive Trade with Conflict,” in M. R. Garfinkel and S.Skaperdas (eds.) The Political Economy of Conflict and Appropriation, New York: Cambridge University Press, 73-95.
91. Smith, Adam (1937) [1776], An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, New York: Modern Library.
92. Spero, J. (1985), The Politics of International Economic Relations, London: Allen and Unwin.
93. Summary, Rebecca M. (1989), “A Political-Economic Model of U.S. Bilateral Trade,” The Review of Economic and Statistics, 89: 179-182
94. Thurow, Lester C. (1992), The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe, and America, New York: Morrow.
95. Tinbergen, Jan (1962), Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for and International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
96. Tyson, Laura D’Andrea (1992), Who’s Bashing Whom: Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries, Washington: Institute for International Economics.
97. Uchitel, Anne (1993), “Interdependence and Instability,” in J. Snyder and R. Jervice (eds.) Coping with Complexity in the International System, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
98. Vogel, S. (1992), “The Power Behind ‘Spin-Ons’: The Military Implications of Japan’s Commercial Technology,” in W. Sandholtz et al. (eds.) The Highest Stakes, New York: Oxford University Press.
99. Vries, M. (1990), “Interdependence, Cooperation and Conflict: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Peace Research, 27: 429-444.
100. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1970), “The Myth of Interdependence,” in Charles P. Kindelberger (ed.) The International Corporation, Cambridge: MIT Press.
101. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
102. Ward, M. D. (1981), “Seasonality, Reaction, Expectation, Adaptation, and Memory in Cooperative and Conflictual Foreign Policy Behavior,” International Interactions, 8: 229-245.
103. Ward, M. D. (1987), “Cargo Cult Science and Eight Fallacies of Comparative Political Research,” International Studies Notes, 13: 75-7.
104. Ward, M. D. (1995), Book Review of “Allies, Adversaries and International Trade by Joanne Gowa,” American Political Science Review, 89: 802-803