When do "relative gains" impede trade?

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 12-37

  Morrow, James D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031060813     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002797041001002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Choi, G. 1994. Trade with the enemy: Its welfare implication. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
2. Dixon, W., and B. Moon. 1993. Political similarity and American foreign trade patterns. Political Research Quarterly 46:5-25.
3. Dorussen, H., and J. Mo. 1995. Relative versus absolute gains: The politics of trade between divided countries. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Austin.
4. Gowa, J. 1989. Bipolarity, multipolarity, and free trade. American Political Science Review 83:1245-56.
5. -. 1994. Allies, adversaries, and international trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Gowa, J., and E. D. Mansfield. 1993. Power politics and international trade. American Political Science Review 87:408-20.
7. Grieco, J. 1988. Anarchy and the limits of international cooperation. International Organization 42:485-507.
8. -. 1990. Cooperation among nations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9. Happe, N., and J. Wakeman-Linn. 1994. Military expenditure and arms trade: Alternative data sources, part I. Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy 1(4):3-38.
10. Keck, O. 1993. The new institutionalism and the relative-gains debate. In International Relations and Pan-Europe, edited by F. R. Pfetsch, 35-62. Münster, Germany: Lit.
11. Lohmann, S. 1997. Linkage politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 38-67.
12. Morrow, J. D. 1991. Alliances and asymmetry. American Journal of Political Science 35:904-33.
13. -. 1994. Game theory for political scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Morrow, J. D., R. M. Siverson, and T. Tabares. 1996. The political determinants of international trade: The major powers, 1907-1965. Unpublished manuscript. Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
15. Murdoch, J. C., and T. Sandler. 1982. A theoretical and empirical analysis of NATO. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26:237-63.
16. Organski, A.F.K., and J. Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Parkinson, C. N., ed. 1948. The trade winds: A study of British overseas trade during the French wars, 1793-1815. London: Allen and Unwin.
18. Pollins, B. M. 1989a. Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: The effects of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows. American Journal of Political Science 33:737-61.
19. -. 1989b. Does trade still follow the flag? American Political Science Review 83:465-80.
20. Powell, R. 1991. Relative and absolute gains in international relations theory. American Political Science Review 85:1303-20.
21. -. 1993. Guns, butter, and anarchy. American Political Science Review 87:115-32.
22. Theis, W. J. 1987. Alliances and collective goods: A reappraisal. Journal of Conflict Resolution 31:298-332.
23. World armaments and disarmament: SIPRI yearbook. 1982. London: Taylor and Francis.
24. World armaments and disarmament: SIPRI yearbook. 1992. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.