An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1633-1661

  Wright, Christopher ^a   Nyberg, Daniel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85039765618     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2015.0718     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Anderson, K., & Bows, A. 2011. Beyond "dangerous" climate change: Emission scenarios for a new world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369: 20-44.
2. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. 2000. Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U. S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 548-570.
3. Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. 2013. Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the "tragedy of the commons. " Organization Science, 24: 1014-1040.
4. Banerjee, S. B. 2003. Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24: 143-180.
5. Bansal, P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14: 510-527.
6. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. 2014. Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12: 70-78.
7. Bansal, P., & Hoffman, A. J. 2012. The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717-736.
9. Barley, S. R. 2007. Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 201-215.
10. Bowen, F. 2014. After greenwashing: Symbolic corporate environmentalism and society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. 2012. From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6: 483-530.
12. Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2013. Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38: 352-376.
13. Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: Anewsociology of knowledge?: 196-223. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. Securing a clean energy future: The Australian government's climate change plan. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
15. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13: 3-21.
16. Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. The Academy of Management Annals, 8: 181-235.
17. Crane, A. 2000. Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies, 21: 673-696.
18. Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. 2016. The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms' sustainability claims and stakeholders' interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 705-729.
19. Crouch, C. 2011. The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge, England: Polity.
20. Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. 1996. Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change: 13-48. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
21. Dauvergne, P., & Lister, J. 2013. Eco-business: A big-brand takeover of sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
22. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. 2008. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1027-1055.
23. Delmas, M. A., &Toffel, M. W. 2012. Institutional pressures and organizational characteristics: Implications for environmental strategy. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 229-247. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24. Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. 2007. Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60: 179-215.
25. Devinney, T. M. 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 44-56.
26. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 25-32.
27. Fineman, S. 1997. Constructing the green manager. British Journal of Management, 8: 31-38.
28. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173-1193.
29. Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. 2013. The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London, England: SAGE.
30. Forbes, L. C., & Jermier, J. M. 2002. The institutionalization of voluntary organizational greening and the ideals of environmentalism: Lessons about official culture from symbolic organization theory. In A. J. Hoffman & M. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 194-213. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Fremeth, A. R., & Richter, B. K. 2011. Profiting from environmental regulatory uncertainty: Integrated strategies for competitive advantage. California Management Review, 54: 145-165.
32. Gao, J., & Bansal, P. 2013. Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112: 241-255.
33. Garnaut, R. 2008. The Garnaut climate change review: Final report. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
34. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15-31.
35. Goodall, A. H. 2008. Why have the leading journals in management (and other social sciences) failed to respond to climate change? Journal of Management Inquiry, 17: 408-420.
36. Gore, A. 2006. An inconvenient truth: The planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Rodale.
37. Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. 2010. Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can't have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19: 217-229.
38. Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. 2014. Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39: 463-487.
39. Hansen, J. 2009. Storms of my grandchildren: The truth about the coming climate catastrophe and our last chance to savehumanity. NewYork, NY: Bloomsbury.
40. Hart, S. L. 1995. Anatural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 986-1014.
41. Head, L., Adams, M., McGregor, H. V., & Toole, S. 2014. Climate change andAustralia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5: 175-197.
42. Heede, R. 2014. Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854-2010. Climatic Change, 122: 229-241.
43. Helm, D. 2010. Government failure, rent-seeking, and capture: The design of climate change policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26: 182-196.
44. Hiller, J. S. 2013. The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118: 287-301.
45. Hoffman, A. J. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U. S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351-371.
46. Hoffman, A. J. 2001. From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47. Hoffman, A. J. 2011. Talking past each other? Cultural framing under climate skeptical and climate convinced logics. Organization & Environment, 24: 3-33.
48. Hoffman, A. J. 2015. How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49. Hoffman, A. J., & Bansal, P. 2012. Introduction: Retrospective, perspective, and prospective. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 3-25. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
50. Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. 2001. Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12: 414-434.
51. Howard-Grenville, J. 2006. Inside the "black box": How organizational culture and subcultures inform interpretations and actions on environmental issues. Organization & Environment, 19: 46-73.
52. Howard-Grenville, J. 2007. Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organization Science, 18: 560-577.
53. Howard-Grenville, J., & Bertels, S. 2012. Organizational culture and environmental action. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 194-210. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54. Howard-Grenville, J., Buckle, S. J., Hoskins, B. J., & George, G. 2014. Climate change and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 615-623.
55. IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56. IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57. Jermier, J. M., Forbes, L. C., Benn, S., & Orsato, R. J. 2006. The new corporate environmentalism and green politics. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, &W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed.): 618-650. London: SAGE.
58. Kaplan, S. 2008. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19: 729-752.
59. Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. 2009. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U. S. hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 897-918.
60. Kolbert, E. 2006. Field notes from a catastrophe: Man, nature, and climate change. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
61. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. 2007. Multinationals' political activities on climate change. Business & Society, 46: 201-228.
62. Lazarus, R. J. 2009. Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94: 1153-1234.
63. Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45: 123-152.
64. Levy, D. L. 1997. Environmental management as political sustainability. Organization & Environment, 10: 126-147.
65. Levy, D. L., & Egan, D. 2003. A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 803-829.
66. Lewis, M. W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25: 760-776.
67. Locke, K. D. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. London, England: SAGE.
68. Lyon, T. P., &Montgomery, A. W. 2015. The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28: 223-249.
69. Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 148-178.
70. Mann, M. 2014. False hope: The rate of global temperature rise may have hit a plateau, but a climate crisis still looms in the near future. Scientific American, 310: 78-81.
71. Mann, M. E., & Kump, L. R. 2015. Dire predictions: Understanding climate change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: DK Publishing.
72. Manne, R. 2011. Bad news: Murdoch's Australian and the shaping of the nation. Quarterly Essay, 43: 1-119.
73. Marcus, A. A. 2015. Innovations in sustainability. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
74. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's view of global warming, 2001-2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52: 155-194.
75. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. 2010. Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal ofManagement, 37: 1480-1495.
76. Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. 2008. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1225-1240.
77. New, M., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., & Anderson, K. 2011. Four degrees and beyond: The potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369: 6-19.
78. Newton, T., & Harte, G. 1997. Green business: Technicist kitsch? Journal of Management Studies, 34: 75-98.
79. Nyberg, D., Spicer, A., & Wright, C. 2013. Incorporating citizens: Corporate political engagement with climate change in Australia. Organization, 20: 433-453.
80. Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. 2012. Justifying business responses to climate change: Discursive strategies of similarity and difference. Environment & Planning A, 44: 1819-1835.
81. Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. 2013. Corporate corruption of the environment: Sustainability as a process of compromise. The British Journal of Sociology, 64: 405-424.
82. Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. 2016. Performative and political: Corporate constructions of climate change risk. Organization, 23: 617-638.
83. Patenaude, G. 2010. Climate class for business schools. Nature, 466: 30-30.
84. Pearse, G. 2007. High&dry: John Howard, climate change and the selling of Australia's future. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Viking.
85. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9: 97-118.
86. Prasad, P., & Elmes, M. 2005. In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 845-867.
87. Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. 2016. Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10: 65-171.
88. Reid, E. M., &Toffel, M. W. 2009. Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1157-1178.
89. Rittell, H., & Webber, M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155-169.
90. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 534-559.
91. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27: 222-247.
92. Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 681-697.
93. Slawinski, N., Pinkse, J., Busch, T., & Banerjee, S. B. 2015. The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: Amultilevel framework. Business & Society, 56: 253-282.
94. Smith, W. K. 2014. Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1592-1623.
95. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: Adynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36: 381-403.
96. Sonenshein, S. 2016. How corporations overcome issue illegitimacy and issue equivocality to address social welfare: The role of the social change agent. Academy of Management Review, 41: 349-366.
97. Sonenshein, S., DeCelles, K. A., & Dutton, J. E. 2014. It's not easy being green: The role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 7-37.
98. Starik, M., &Marcus, A. A. 2000. Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment: A field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 539-547.
99. Starkey, K., & Crane, A. 2003. Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28: 220-237.
100. Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
101. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
102. Tsui, A. S. 2013. 2012 presidential address-On compassion in scholarship: Whyshouldwecare? Academy of Management Review, 38: 167-180.
103. Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. 2008. A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33: 985-993.
104. Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. 2015. Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28: 54-79.
105. Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M., & Arenas, D. 2009. Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 57-69.
106. Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. 2013. Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 307-336.
107. Wijen, F. 2014. Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39: 302-323.
108. Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. 2012. Working with passion: Emotionology, corporate environmentalism and climate change. Human Relations, 65: 1561-1587.
109. Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. 2014. Creative self-destruction: Corporate responses to climate change as political myths. Environmental Politics, 23: 205-223.
110. Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. 2015. Climate change, capitalism and corporations: Processes of creative selfdestruction. Cambridge, England: CambridgeUniversity Press.
111. Wright, C., Nyberg, D., & Grant, D. 2012. "Hippies on the third floor": Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organization Studies, 33: 1451-1475.
112. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
113. York, J. G., Hargrave, T. J., & Pacheco, D. F. 2016. Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 579-610.